VHTXLV

VHT vs XLV

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in October 2026.

VHT tracks the MSCI US IMI 25/50 Health Care index with 424 holdings for a 0.09% expense ratio, while XLV tracks the S&P Health Care Select Sector index with 63 holdings for 0.08%. Both list the same ...

Investment Analysis

VHT

VHT

VHT

Pros

  • 424 holdings span large, mid and small-cap healthcare, including smaller biotech
  • Lower single-stock concentration, with Eli Lilly at 12.79% versus 14.95% in XLV
  • Vanguard fund with a history back to January 2004

Considerations

  • Expense ratio of 0.09% is a touch above XLV's 0.08%
  • Smaller fund at about $19 billion in net assets compared with XLV's $43.5 billion
  • Small-cap biotech exposure can add volatility without changing the top-heavy profile
XLV

XLV

XLV

Pros

  • Expense ratio of 0.08%, about $8 a year per $10,000 invested
  • About $43.5 billion in net assets and trading history since December 1998
  • Pure large-cap exposure to the S&P 500 healthcare sector with 63 holdings

Considerations

  • Only 63 holdings, so no exposure to mid or small-cap healthcare companies
  • More concentrated, with Eli Lilly and Johnson & Johnson above 25% combined
  • Dividend yield of 1.50% is essentially the same as VHT's 1.49%

Buy VHT or XLV in Nemo

Nemo Logo Fade
🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

Frequently asked questions