

SIVR vs SLV
Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV) both hold physical silver and track the LBMA Silver Price. SIVR charges 0.30% a year on $4.69 billion in assets, while SLV charges 0.50% on $32.81 billion. SIVR suits cost-conscious long-term holders; SLV suits investors who prioritize the larger, longer-established trust. Educational content, not financial advice.
abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV) both hold physical silver and track the LBMA Silver Price. SIVR charges 0.30% a year on $4.69 billion in assets, while SLV charge...
Investment Analysis

SIVR
SIVR
Pros
- Lower expense ratio of 0.30%, or $30 a year per $10,000 invested
- Holds physical silver and tracks the same LBMA Silver Price as SLV
- Saves $20 a year per $10,000 compared with SLV for identical metal exposure
Considerations
- Much smaller trust at $4.69 billion versus $32.81 billion for SLV
- Launched in July 2009, three years after SLV
- Pays no dividends, as silver generates no income

SLV
SLV
Pros
- Largest silver trust in this comparison with $32.81 billion in net assets
- Trading since April 2006, giving it a long track record
- Tracks the LBMA Silver Price with physical silver held in vaults
Considerations
- Expense ratio of 0.50% is higher than SIVR's 0.30%
- Costs $50 a year per $10,000 invested, $20 more than SIVR
- No income, so the higher fee is a direct drag on returns
Buy SIVR or SLV in Nemo
Zero Commission
Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.
Trusted & Regulated
Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.
6% Interest on Cash
Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.


