What is the main structural difference between these two ETFs?

SIVR is a commodities-focused fund that provides direct exposure to physical silver, meaning its value is tied to spot silver prices. SLVP is an equity precious metals fund that invests in shares of companies involved in silver mining. This means SLVP is subject to company-specific risks, such as operational costs and management decisions, whereas SIVR's performance depends primarily on the underlying metal's price movement.

Why do ETFs with similar themes have different performance drivers?

Even if two ETFs track the same commodity sector, their performance drivers differ based on structure. SIVR relies on silver spot prices, while SLVP is influenced by equity markets and mining operations. A drop in silver prices hurts both, but poor earnings or operational issues at specific mining companies can affect SLVP's net asset value independently of the metal price, illustrating how investment vehicles can have varied risk profiles.

How should investors interpret net assets and liquidity?

Net assets reflect the total value of securities a fund holds. SIVR has $4.7 billion in assets compared to SLVP's $986 million. Generally, larger asset bases contribute to deeper secondary market liquidity, making it potentially easier to buy or sell shares without significantly affecting the price. However, investors must still consider trading volumes and bid-ask spreads, as size alone does not guarantee optimal execution for every trade.

How do the expense ratios of these two funds compare?

SIVR has an expense ratio of 0.30%, which is lower than SLVP's 0.39%. This difference of 0.09 percentage points represents an annual fee. Over long periods, lower fees may preserve more of the investor's capital, assuming other factors are equal. Investors should note these figures from the data provided and understand that expense ratios deduct directly from the fund's returns, impacting the net performance relative to the gross benchmark.

What does a zero dividend yield imply for income strategies?

SIVR lists a 0.00% dividend yield because it holds physical metal, which generates no cash flow. SLVP offers a 1.85% dividend yield, derived from its holdings of mining equities. For investors seeking income, the structural difference is critical: physical commodity ETFs typically provide capital appreciation potential without yield, while equity-based sector ETFs may distribute regular dividends if the underlying companies pay them.

How concentrated are the holdings in each fund?

SLVP's top holding, HL, accounts for 14.50% of its portfolio, followed by NEM at 4.56% and CDE at 1.80%. In contrast, SIVR's top holdings are not available as it likely tracks physical metal bars rather than individual stocks. Comparing SIVR and SLVP reveals how an equity fund holds specific shares, while SIVR's structure differs, offering distinct exposure and potentially less concentration in any single issuer.

How might silver price changes affect each fund differently?

SIVR tracks silver spot movements directly, so its price typically mirrors the metal closely. SLVP provides operational leverage, meaning its value may rise more sharply than silver itself during price increases due to improved miner profitability. Conversely, it may fall more heavily during declines. Investors should understand that equity miners are sensitive to both commodity prices and broader stock market sentiment, leading to potentially more volatile performance.

Do these two ETFs share the same top holdings?

No, the shared top-10 holdings are listed as none among the available data. SIVR's top holdings are not available, consistent with its structure as a physical silver fund, while SLVP holds specific mining equities like HL and NEM. This distinct separation in holdings confirms that these funds serve different investment objectives. They do not duplicate each other's portfolios, meaning owning both would result in diversified exposure across both metal and corporate sectors.

Why is liquidity an important consideration when comparing these funds?

Liquidity refers to how easily an asset can be bought or sold without significantly impacting its price. The data suggests SIVR's larger asset base of $4.7 billion versus SLVP's $986 million may offer deeper secondary market liquidity. Investors should consider that lower liquidity can result in wider bid-ask spreads, increasing the effective transaction cost. Therefore, comparing asset size is a fundamental step in evaluating potential trading execution efficiency for each fund.

How can investors align these ETFs with their investment goals?

Investors focusing on hedging inflation or seeking direct metal exposure might consider SIVR's structure. Those seeking potential growth from mining operations and a dividend yield might look at SLVP. This distinction aligns with their specific goals: direct commodity exposure versus leveraged equity participation. Comparing SIVR and SLVP helps investors understand that choosing the right fund depends on whether they prefer passive metal tracking or active corporate sector involvement.

What is the importance of reading the educational disclaimer?

Educational disclaimers on financial pages clarify that comparisons are for informational purposes only, not personalised advice. For instance, noting that SIVR has a $4.7 billion asset base and SLVP has $986 million helps in understanding fund size differences, but does not indicate which is superior for your specific financial situation. Always consult a qualified professional and review official fund documents before making investment decisions.

SIVR vs SLVP

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare SIVR (Abrdn Silver Etf Abrdn Physical Silver Shares Etf) and SLVP (Ishares Msci Global Silver And Metals Miners Etf). This page outlines key differences in expense ratios, net assets, dividend yields, and index focus. See how each fund tracks the silver market. Educational content, not financial advice.

Compare SIVR (Abrdn Silver Etf Abrdn Physical Silver Shares Etf) and SLVP (Ishares Msci Global Silver And Metals Miners Etf). This page outlines key differences in expense ratios, net assets, dividend...

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

SIVR

Metric

SLVP

0.30%

Expense Ratio

0.39%

0.00%

Dividend Yield

1.85%

$4.69B

Net Assets

$985.57M

1

Holdings

49

Jul 24, 2009

Inception Date

Jan 31, 2012

–

Index Tracked

–

Commodities Focused

Fund Category

Equity Precious Metals

SIVR costs about $9.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

These funds do not share any of their top holdings.

Discover More Comparisons

SIVR vs SLV

SIVR vs SLV: both hold physical silver and track the LBMA Silver Price. SIVR charges 0.30% on $4.69B, SLV 0.50% on $32.81B, a 0.20% fee gap each year.

GDX vs SLVP

Compare GDX and SLVP ETFs. Review fee structures, top holdings, dividend yields, tracking methods, and operational history for these precious metals funds.

SIL vs SLVP

Compare SIL and SLVP silver miners ETFs. Review expense ratios, top holdings, dividend yields, and tracking differences between Global X and iShares funds.

Investment Analysis

SIVR

Pros

Expense ratio is lower than SLVP at 0.30 percent.
Larger asset base provides deeper secondary market liquidity.
Physical structure offers direct exposure to silver spot movements.

Considerations

Zero dividend yield limits income generation potential.
Top holdings and sector weights data are not available.
Price volatility depends entirely on silver metal fluctuations.

SLVP

Pros

Equity miners provide operational leverage to silver price increases.
Generated a 1.85 percent dividend yield for investors.
Offered exposure to a diversified portfolio of global silver companies.

Considerations

Expense ratio is higher than SIVR at 0.39 percent.
Small size of 986 million assets may constrain liquidity.
Top holding weight is concentrated at 14.50 percent.

Related Market Insights

When Silver Went Viral: The Making of a Meme Commodity

Explore silver's rise as the first meme commodity. Discover how social media drives unprecedented trading volumes and investment opportunities. Trade silver & miners with Nemo.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

3 February 2026

Read Insight

Related Market Insights

When Silver Went Viral: The Making of a Meme Commodity

Explore silver's rise as the first meme commodity. Discover how social media drives unprecedented trading volumes and investment opportunities. Trade silver & miners with Nemo.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

3 February 2026

Read Insight

About SIVR and SLVP

SIVR (SIVR)

SLVP (SLVP)

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Meme Commodity Trading: What's Next for Silver ETFs?

Silver prices have skyrocketed due to a retail investor frenzy, turning the precious metal into a "meme commodity." This theme identifies companies in the precious metals ecosystem, including miners and ETF providers, that stand to gain from the heightened trading activity and market volatility.

Published: 3 February 2026

Explore Basket