

SIL vs SLV
Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.
SIL and SLV both give exposure to silver in different ways. SIL tracks the Solactive Global Silver Miners index, holding 43 mining and royalty stocks led by Wheaton Precious Metals at 24.01%, for 0.65% a year with a 1.09% yield. SLV is an iShares trust that holds physical silver, tracks the LBMA Silver Price, pays no dividends and costs 0.5%. Educational content, not financial advice.
SIL and SLV both give exposure to silver in different ways. SIL tracks the Solactive Global Silver Miners index, holding 43 mining and royalty stocks led by Wheaton Precious Metals at 24.01%, for 0.65...
Investment Analysis

SIL
SIL
Pros
- Pays a dividend yield of 1.09%, which a bullion trust like SLV cannot offer.
- Holds 43 miners and royalty companies including Wheaton, Pan American and Coeur.
- Mining shares can move more than the silver price, in both directions.
Considerations
- Expense ratio of 0.65% is higher than SLV's 0.5%.
- Wheaton Precious Metals alone is 24.01% and the top three are about 46% of the fund.
- Company-specific risks such as mine costs and production problems affect returns.

SLV
SLV
Pros
- Tracks the LBMA Silver Price directly by holding physical silver in vaults.
- Lower cost at 0.5%, or $50 a year per $10,000 invested.
- Very large trust with $32.81 billion in net assets, trading since 2006.
Considerations
- Pays no dividends, so the only return comes from the silver price.
- The 0.5% annual fee is paid by gradually selling silver, which reduces metal per share over time.
- No exposure to company growth, new mines or royalty income.
Buy SIL or SLV in Nemo
Zero Commission
Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.
Trusted & Regulated
Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.
6% Interest on Cash
Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.


