What do the expense ratios of MGV and VIG mean for investors?

MGV has an expense ratio of 0.05% while VIG has a ratio of 0.04%. This difference of 0.01 percentage points represents the annual management cost deducted from the fund's assets. Although small, fees compound over time and reduce total returns. Investors should consider that VIG is marginally cheaper to hold. However, the decision should not rely solely on this 0.01% difference, as both funds are low-cost Vanguard products with similar structures.

How do the investment categories of MGV and VIG differ?

MGV is categorised as a Large Value fund, focusing on large-capitalisation companies that are considered undervalued relative to their fundamentals. In contrast, VIG is categorised as a Large Blend fund, targeting companies with a track record of increasing their dividends over time. This fundamental difference means MGV leans towards potential price recovery, while VIG focuses on growth consistency. Understanding these categories helps investors align the ETFs with their specific investment preferences and risk tolerance.

Why are sector weights not available for either fund?

The provided data indicates that sector weights are not available for both MGV and VIG. Consequently, investors cannot assess the exact concentration risk or diversification across specific industries such as technology, healthcare, or financials. Without this transparency, it is difficult to determine how either fund is positioned relative to sector benchmarks. Investors should exercise caution and seek additional documentation from Vanguard or other financial sources to fully understand the portfolio composition and potential sector biases of these ETFs.

Which stocks are common top holdings between MGV and VIG?

Both funds share four holdings in their top ten lists: JPM (JPMorgan Chase), XOM (Exxon Mobil), JNJ (Johnson & Johnson), and WMT (Walmart). This overlap suggests that these large-cap companies meet the criteria for both value and dividend appreciation strategies. JPM has weights of 4.41% in MGV and 4.07% in VIG, while XOM is 3.08% in MGV and 2.85% in VIG. The shared holdings indicate a partial correlation between the two funds' performance.

What distinguishes the unique top holdings of MGV?

MGV's unique top holdings include MU (Micron Technology), BRK.B (Berkshire Hathaway), BAC (Bank of America), and CSCO (Cisco Systems). These companies are weighted at 5.00%, 3.30%, 1.83%, and 1.81% respectively. The presence of BRK.B and BAC highlights MGV's focus on financials and conglomerates that may be trading at lower valuations compared to the broader market. MU's inclusion adds a technology component, though the overall profile remains consistent with a mega-cap value strategy emphasising financial stability.

What are the key top holdings unique to VIG?

VIG's distinct top holdings are MSFT (Microsoft), AAPL (Apple), AVGO (Broadcom), LLY (Eli Lilly), V (Visa), and MA (Mastercard). MSFT and AAPL are the largest positions at 4.68% and 4.51% respectively. These companies are widely recognised for their ability to increase dividends over consecutive years. The presence of AVGO and LLY further emphasises the fund's focus on high-quality growth companies with strong earnings histories, differentiating it from the more financially oriented unique holdings in MGV.

How do the net assets of MGV and VIG compare?

VIG manages significantly more capital than MGV, with net assets of $110.8 billion compared to MGV's $13.9 billion. This substantial difference in scale generally results in deeper liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads for VIG, making it easier to trade large blocks of shares without impacting the price. While MGV remains large enough for most retail investors, the sheer size of VIG reflects its broader adoption among institutions and individuals seeking dividend growth exposure in the current market environment.

Which fund was established earlier, MGV or VIG?

VIG was established earlier, with an inception date of 21 April 2006. MGV was launched later, on 17 December 2007. This means VIG has a slightly longer history of performance data and market exposure. However, both funds have been operating for well over a decade, covering various market cycles including the 2008 financial crisis, the post-2008 recovery, and recent market conditions. The age difference is minimal in the context of long-term investing.

What do the dividend yields indicate about MGV and VIG?

MGV offers a dividend yield of 1.85%, which is higher than VIG's yield of 1.51%. This reflects MGV's focus on value stocks, which often pay higher dividends to attract investors when growth is slower. VIG's lower yield is typical for dividend appreciation funds, which prioritise companies that grow their payouts over time rather than those with the highest current yields. Investors seeking immediate income might look at MGV, while those focusing on future income growth might consider VIG.

Where can I find accurate historical performance data for these ETFs?

Since sector weights and specific index tracking information are not available in the current dataset, investors should consult Vanguard's official fund pages or reliable financial data providers like Yahoo Finance for historical performance. It is crucial to verify that any data source is reputable and up-to-date. Be aware that past performance is not indicative of future results. Additionally, note that the data presented here was fetched on 22 September 2026; always check the latest figures for making informed investment decisions.

What are the potential risks of not knowing the sector weights?

The absence of sector weights for both MGV and VIG creates a blind spot regarding concentration risk. For instance, without this data, an investor cannot confirm if either fund is heavily overweighted in sectors like financials or energy, despite top holdings like JPM and XOM suggesting their presence. This lack of transparency means investors cannot effectively diversify their portfolio against sector-specific downturns. Further research is required to ensure these funds align with a balanced investment strategy.

MGV vs VIG

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

This page compares the Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). It outlines the expense ratios of 0.05% and 0.04%, details top holdings and sector weightings, and examines dividend yields of 1.85% and 1.51%. The data also illustrates how each fund tracks its respective market index, providing a factual overview of these Vanguard ETFs. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

MGV

Metric

VIG

0.05%

Expense Ratio

0.04%

1.85%

Dividend Yield

1.51%

$13.87B

Net Assets

$110.76B

128

Holdings

343

Dec 17, 2007

Inception Date

Apr 21, 2006

–

Index Tracked

–

Large Value

Fund Category

Large Blend

VIG costs about $1.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	MGV	VIG
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.	4.41%	4.07%
XOMExxonMobil Holdings Corporation	3.08%	2.85%
JNJJohnson & Johnson	2.96%	2.73%
WMTWalmart Inc.	2.13%	1.96%

Discover More Comparisons

MGV vs VTV

Compare MGV and VTV. Review 0.05% vs 0.03% fees, assets, yields and holdings to assess large value ETF tracking differences in a neutral manner.

MGV vs VTI

Compare MGV vs VTI ETFs. Review expense ratios of 0.05% and 0.03%, dividend yields, top holdings and market segment tracking for factual analysis.

MGV vs VYM

Compare MGV and VYM expense ratios, net assets, and yields. Analyse top holdings like JPM and XOM to understand their differing market focuses.

Investment Analysis

MGV

Pros

MGV offers large-cap value exposure with a low expense ratio of 0.05%.
Net assets of $13.9 billion provide sufficient size and liquidity for trading.
A dividend yield of 1.85% exceeds the broader market average for value funds.

Considerations

The tracked index is listed as not available, limiting transparency on methodology.
Sector weights are not available, making it difficult to assess concentration risk.
Top holdings include cyclical sectors like energy and financials, which may increase volatility.

VIG

Pros

VIG provides exposure to dividend growth stocks with a lower expense ratio of 0.04%.
With $110.8 billion in net assets, the fund benefits from substantial liquidity and trading depth.
Top holdings include quality companies with a track record of growing dividends, such as MSFT and AAPL.

Considerations

The specific index tracked is not available, obscuring the precise selection criteria.
Sector weights are not provided, hindering a clear analysis of diversification across industries.
A dividend yield of 1.51% is relatively low, reflecting growth focus over income generation.

About MGV and VIG

MGV (MGV)

The Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF is an exchange-traded fund designed to provide exposure to large-cap stocks that are considered undervalued relative to their peers. With a low expense ratio of 0.05%, this fund aims to offer cost-effective access to the value segment of the mega-cap market. It holds approximately 128 companies, focusing on firms with strong fundamentals that the market may have overlooked. Since its inception in December 2007, it has managed net assets of around USD 13.87 billion. The fund currently provides a dividend yield of 1.85%, making it a potential option for investors seeking value in large companies. However, like all investments, values can rise and fall, and returns are not guaranteed.

VIG (VIG)

The Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) offers investors exposure to US large-cap companies with a history of increasing their dividends. It aims to track an index of stocks that have consistently raised payouts, focusing on financial discipline and steady growth rather than just high yields. With a very low expense ratio of 0.04% and net assets of approximately USD 110.76 billion, it is a cost-effective tool for building a diversified equity portfolio. The fund holds around 343 positions, providing broad market coverage. Investors should note that while dividend increases can signal company health, values can rise and fall, and returns are not guaranteed. Past performance does not ensure future results.

Buy MGV or VIG in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

MGV vs VIG

Fund Snapshot