What are the expense ratios for MGV and VTI?

MGV has an expense ratio of 0.05%, while VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03%. The difference is 0.02 percentage points, meaning VTI charges slightly less annually. Over long periods, small fee differences can influence net returns, though other factors such as market performance also matter.

What are MGV and VTI tracking?

MGV is designed to track a mega-cap value strategy, focusing on large companies considered to have value characteristics. VTI tracks a broader blend across the entire U.S. stock market, covering mega, large, mid and small caps.

How do MGV and VTI dividend yields differ?

MGV has a dividend yield of 1.85%, while VTI's yield is 1.02%. These figures are based on the most recent fund data provided. A higher yield does not automatically mean higher returns; it reflects the payout relative to the fund's price.

What do the top holdings suggest about these funds?

Both MGV and VTI include MU in their top 10 holdings, showing some overlap. Beyond that, MGV features value-oriented companies such as JPM and XOM, while VTI includes technology leaders like NVDA, AAPL and MSFT.

How do the funds' market caps differ?

MGV has net assets of $13.9 billion, indicating a smaller but still substantial fund size. VTI is much larger at $692.2 billion in net assets. In general, larger funds can offer benefits such as tight spreads and stable liquidity.

Which fund tracks a broader market?

VTI is typically associated with tracking the entire U.S. stock market, offering wide diversification across multiple market capitalisation sizes. MGV concentrates on mega-cap value stocks, resulting in a more focused equity approach.

Why might dividend yields vary between funds?

Dividend yields depend on the underlying holdings' payment habits and share prices. Value-oriented portfolios like MGV may hold companies that distribute more cash dividends, while growth-leaning constituents in VTI may prioritise reinvestment or have different payout structures.

How can investors interpret the sector weightings?

The provided data does not disclose sector weights for either fund, so exact sector comparisons cannot be made. Investors can review official fund documentation for updated details.

What are the fund inception dates?

VTI was launched on 24 May 2001, giving it over two decades of market exposure. MGV was established on 17 December 2007, providing several years of performance history.

Is the educational disclaimer important?

Yes. The information provided here is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, recommendation, or solicitation. Investors should conduct their own research or consult a professional before making decisions.

MGV vs VTI

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). This page examines fees, holdings, dividends and how each fund tracks its market segment. MGV has a 0.05% expense ratio with a 1.85% yield, while VTI has a 0.03% ratio with a 1.02% yield. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

MGV

Metric

VTI

0.05%

Expense Ratio

0.03%

1.85%

Dividend Yield

1.02%

$13.87B

Net Assets

$692.20B

128

Holdings

3,514

Dec 17, 2007

Inception Date

May 24, 2001

–

Index Tracked

–

Large Value

Fund Category

Large Blend

VTI costs about $2.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	MGV	VTI
MUMicron Technology, Inc.	5.00%	1.46%

Discover More Comparisons

MGV vs VTV

Compare MGV and VTV. Review 0.05% vs 0.03% fees, assets, yields and holdings to assess large value ETF tracking differences in a neutral manner.

MGV vs VYM

Compare MGV and VYM expense ratios, net assets, and yields. Analyse top holdings like JPM and XOM to understand their differing market focuses.

MGV vs SCHD

Compare MGV and SCHD ETFs. Review 0.05% vs 0.06% fees, 1.85% vs 3.11% yields, holdings differences, and tracking details for informed research.

Investment Analysis

MGV

Pros

Low expense ratio of 0.05% reduces drag on long-term returns.
Substantial net assets of $13.9 billion indicate liquidity and fund viability.
Established track record since inception in December 2007 provides historical data.

Considerations

Value tilt may result in underperformance relative to growth during bull markets.
Larger 10.8% top-10 concentration creates single-stock and sector idiosyncratic risk.
Tracked index details are unavailable, potentially complicating precise strategy verification.

VTI

Pros

Extremely low expense ratio of 0.03% minimises management costs for investors.
Huge net assets of $692.2 billion ensure high liquidity and tight trading spreads.
Exposure across the entire US equity market supports broad diversification objectives.

Considerations

Dominant mega-cap weightings, led by NVDA at 6.87%, drive concentrated market exposure.
Blend index tracking methodology details are unavailable for verification against holdings.
Modest dividend yield of 1.02% may limit appeal for income-focused portfolios.

About MGV and VTI

MGV (MGV)

The Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF is an exchange-traded fund designed to provide exposure to large-cap stocks that are considered undervalued relative to their peers. With a low expense ratio of 0.05%, this fund aims to offer cost-effective access to the value segment of the mega-cap market. It holds approximately 128 companies, focusing on firms with strong fundamentals that the market may have overlooked. Since its inception in December 2007, it has managed net assets of around USD 13.87 billion. The fund currently provides a dividend yield of 1.85%, making it a potential option for investors seeking value in large companies. However, like all investments, values can rise and fall, and returns are not guaranteed.

VTI (VTI)

This ETF offers broad exposure to the US equity market by tracking a comprehensive index of publicly traded companies. Designed as a large blend fund, it holds thousands of individual stocks, ranging from massive multinational corporations to smaller domestic firms. With an ultra-low expense ratio of 0.03%, it aims to provide cost-efficient long-term growth potential. The fund has a dividend yield of approximately 1.02%, reflecting the aggregate distributions from its holdings. Investors often consider this vehicle for core portfolio diversification, though it is essential to remember that stock market investments carry inherent risks, and values can fluctuate. Past performance is not indicative of future results, and returns are not guaranteed.

Buy MGV or VTI in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

MGV vs VTI

Fund Snapshot