What does expense ratio mean for ETFs?

The expense ratio represents the annual fee charged to manage a fund. For MGV, it is 0.05%, while VTV has an even lower ratio of 0.03%. These costs are deducted directly from fund assets, reducing overall returns over time. A lower expense ratio can lead to better net performance because more of your investment remains working for you.

How do index tracked details impact fund selection?

Knowing what index a fund tracks helps determine its methodology and strategy. However, for both MGV and VTV, the specific index tracked is not available. This limitation can affect transparency regarding how the fund selects and weights its investments. Investors often seek clarity on benchmarks to understand risk and potential returns better.

What is the significance of inception dates in ETF comparisons?

The inception date shows how long a fund has existed, providing context about its track record. MGV was launched on Dec 17, 2007, whereas VTV began earlier, on Jan 26, 2004. Longer histories offer insights into how funds have managed assets across various market cycles, which may help investors assess stability and reliability.

How does the dividend yield compare between these funds?

Both MGV and VTV have a dividend yield of 1.85%. This similarity indicates that they provide comparable income opportunities to investors. However, dividends are not guaranteed and depend on fund performance. ETF distributions typically follow specific schedules and may fluctuate based on market conditions and holdings' payout policies.

How do the holdings of these ETFs overlap?

Both MGV and VTV share nine top holdings, including MU, JPM, and BRK.B. This overlap suggests a similar investment focus on value stocks within the mega-cap and large-cap segments. Despite this common ground, individual weights differ slightly, with MGV allocating more to MU and VTV diversifying its holdings marginally more.

Which fund offers higher liquidity?

Liquidity depends on net assets and trading volume. VTV boasts substantial net assets of $191.1 billion, indicating robust liquidity. MGV, with $13.9 billion, has a much smaller asset base, potentially making it less liquid. Higher liquidity can mean smoother trading experiences, especially for larger investments, but lower asset bases do not necessarily mean higher risk.

How does scale impact a fund's concentration?

Larger scale can influence how concentrated a fund is in certain stocks. VTV, with $191.1 billion in net assets, holds a diverse array of mega-cap stocks without being overly concentrated in any single one. Meanwhile, MGV, though smaller, tracks similar companies with different allocations, suggesting less concern about extreme concentration due to its narrower focus.

What are the key differences between MGV and VTV?

Key differences include expense ratios—MGV at 0.05% versus VTV at 0.03%—and net assets, where VTV has $191.1 billion compared to MGV's $13.9 billion. The difference in size affects liquidity and possibly concentration risk. Both funds aim at large value markets but differ slightly in top holdings and fund inception periods.

How do sector weights influence portfolio diversity?

Sector weights help gauge diversification and potential risks. However, for MGV and VTV, sector weights are not available. Without this data, assessing how diversified each fund truly is becomes challenging. Sector weight information usually indicates exposure to industries like technology or healthcare, affecting how well a portfolio can spread risks.

Can fund size affect market tracking?

Fund size can influence how closely a fund tracks its intended market segment. While MGV and VTV are dedicated to large value stocks, VTV's massive asset base implies it can easily accommodate large investments. In contrast, MGV's smaller size might not pose tracking issues but could limit flexibility during significant market shifts.

What practical considerations should investors review when comparing ETFs?

Investors should consider factors like expense ratios, liquidity, and dividend yields. These elements impact cost, ease of trading, and income potential. Remember, this comparison is educational and does not constitute financial advice. Always conduct thorough research or consult a professional to understand your specific situation.

How can one start researching ETFs for personal investment?

Begin by reviewing fund basics like expense ratios, net assets, and dividend yields. Then, explore top holdings and historical performance. Educational platforms provide extensive resources to help understand ETF mechanics without assuming they are financial advice. Ensure the fund aligns with your financial goals before making any decisions.

MGV vs VTV

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) to understand how each tracks large value markets. This page reviews fees, holdings, and dividend yields to help you see similarities and differences between these two Vanguard funds. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

MGV

Metric

VTV

0.05%

Expense Ratio

0.03%

1.85%

Dividend Yield

1.85%

$13.87B

Net Assets

$191.07B

128

Holdings

319

Dec 17, 2007

Inception Date

Jan 26, 2004

–

Index Tracked

–

Large Value

Fund Category

Large Value

VTV costs about $2.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	MGV	VTV
MUMicron Technology, Inc.	5.00%	3.94%
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.	4.41%	3.47%
BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc.	3.30%	2.88%
XOMExxonMobil Holdings Corporation	3.08%	2.43%
JNJJohnson & Johnson	2.96%	2.33%
WMTWalmart Inc.	2.13%	1.67%
ABBVAbbVie Inc.	2.09%	1.65%
BACBank of America Corporation	1.83%	1.44%
CSCOCisco Systems, Inc.	1.81%	1.43%

Discover More Comparisons

SCHD vs VTV

Compare SCHD and VTV ETFs on expense ratios, net assets and dividend yields. Review top holdings and track record details in this neutral comparison.

SCHV vs VTV

Compare SCHV vs VTV on fees, holdings and dividends. See how Schwab US Large-Cap Value ETF and Vanguard Value ETF track value strategies side by side.

AVLV vs VTV

Compare AVLV vs VTV on fees, dividends, and holdings. AVLV charges 0.15% with 1.11% yield; VTV costs 0.03% with 1.85% yield. Neutral data overview.

Investment Analysis

MGV

Pros

Very low expense ratio of 0.05% reduces ongoing costs for investors.
Substantial net assets of $13.9 billion indicate good scale and liquidity.
Long track record since inception on Dec 17, 2007 demonstrates stability.

Considerations

Expense ratio is higher than Vanguard Value ETF at 0.05% versus 0.03%.
Smaller asset base compared to the broader Vanguard Value ETF fund.
Index tracked is not available, limiting transparency on methodology.

VTV

Pros

Extremely low expense ratio of 0.03% minimises fees for shareholders.
Massive net assets of $191.1 billion ensure high liquidity and trading volume.
Long history since inception on Jan 26, 2004 provides proven track record.

Considerations

Index tracked is not available, reducing clarity on the specific benchmark.
Similar dividend yield of 1.85% may not offer superior income appeal.
Large asset base can lead to concentration in mega-cap holdings.

About MGV and VTV

MGV (MGV)

The Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF is an exchange-traded fund designed to provide exposure to large-cap stocks that are considered undervalued relative to their peers. With a low expense ratio of 0.05%, this fund aims to offer cost-effective access to the value segment of the mega-cap market. It holds approximately 128 companies, focusing on firms with strong fundamentals that the market may have overlooked. Since its inception in December 2007, it has managed net assets of around USD 13.87 billion. The fund currently provides a dividend yield of 1.85%, making it a potential option for investors seeking value in large companies. However, like all investments, values can rise and fall, and returns are not guaranteed.

VTV (VTV)

The Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) is a large-cap value fund designed to track the performance of US large-capitalisation companies considered to have value characteristics. Launched in January 2004, it currently holds a diverse portfolio of 319 stocks. With a very low expense ratio of just 0.03%, it offers investors a cost-effective way to access established US companies that may be trading at lower prices relative to their fundamental metrics. The fund has accumulated net assets of approximately USD 191.07 billion, indicating significant liquidity and investor confidence. It currently provides a dividend yield of 1.85%. While value strategies can offer potential advantages during market rotations, like all investments, the value of shares can fall as well as rise, and returns are not guaranteed. This fund is generally suitable for investors seeking diversified exposure to the US large-cap value segment as part of a broader portfolio strategy.

Buy MGV or VTV in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

MGV vs VTV

Fund Snapshot