What type of investing focus do the MGV and VYM ETFs share?

MGV and VYM both sit within the Large Value category, meaning they target established companies that may trade at relatively modest valuations compared to growth stocks. While their broader classification overlaps, their specific screening rules differ. MGV focuses on mega-capitalisation value characteristics, whereas VYM emphasises high dividend yield within the value style. Investors should consider how these subtle distinctions in methodology might influence portfolio exposure.

What do net assets tell me about an ETF's liquidity?

Net assets represent the total market value of the fund's holdings. VYM has $80.9 billion in net assets, while MGV has $13.9 billion. Higher asset levels generally support better liquidity, enabling the ETF to handle investor buying and selling with less impact on the share price. However, larger size does not guarantee better returns; it primarily relates to trading ease and the fund's stability over time.

How does the dividend yield of an ETF affect its return?

The dividend yield is the annual payout divided by the current price. VYM has a 2.31% yield compared to MGV's 1.85%. A higher yield suggests more income generation, which is VYM's core objective. For an ETF, this income is distributed to shareholders, who receive cash if they have not set up reinvestment. Investors should evaluate if this income focus aligns with their overall portfolio income needs.

What investing goals are typically associated with MGV?

MGV targets large, value-oriented companies, making it suitable for investors seeking broad exposure to established mega-cap stocks in the U.S. market. The primary goal is capital appreciation through the performance of these large-cap value firms. It is not designed for income generation, given its lower yield. Investors often add it to a core portfolio to balance growth-oriented holdings, relying on price appreciation as the primary return driver.

What investing goals are typically associated with VYM?

VYM is designed for investors prioritising income, specifically through the selection of stocks with higher dividend yields. While it maintains a value style, its core objective is to provide a robust stream of distributions. Investors often use it to enhance portfolio cash flow. It is less focused on capital appreciation as the sole driver of returns, making it attractive for those who want regular payouts from their equity investments.

What are the main differences in their investment methodology?

MGV tracks the performance of the U.S. large-cap value market, focusing on mega-cap stocks trading at attractive prices. VYM targets high-dividend-yielding stocks, which often have stable cash flows and are typically large-cap. While both are value-oriented, MGV emphasises valuation metrics for appreciation, whereas VYM prioritises dividend yield for income. This means VYM's holdings are selected for their payout capacity rather than just their price value relative to fundamentals.

How do the top holdings compare in terms of company size?

Both funds hold major multinational corporations. MGV's largest holding is MU at 5.00%, reflecting its 'mega-cap' focus. VYM's largest holding is AVGO at 6.93%, indicating a slightly higher concentration in its top pick compared to MGV. However, both funds hold companies like JPM and XOM in their top ten, confirming they both invest in well-established, large-scale businesses. The weightings reflect their specific screening criteria.

How significant is the difference in expense ratios between MGV and VYM?

MGV has an expense ratio of 0.05%, while VYM is 0.04%. This 0.01 percentage point difference is very small. For an investor with $10,000 in each fund, the annual cost would be $5.00 for MGV and $4.00 for VYM. Over many years, this minor difference accumulates to negligible sums unless the investment amount is enormous. It is generally not a decisive factor for most investors.

What does the top holding concentration mean for MGV and VYM?

For MGV, the largest position in the top ten is MU at 5.00%. For VYM, the top position in the top ten is AVGO at 6.93%. A higher weight in one company increases reliance on that firm's performance. VYM's 6.93% in AVGO is slightly more concentrated than MGV's 5.00% in MU. This means a stock-specific event for AVGO might have a marginally larger impact on VYM's short-term valuation.

What does 'value style' mean for the portfolios of MGV and VYM?

Value style investing involves identifying companies that appear undervalued relative to their earnings, book value, or dividends. VYM specifically seeks companies paying higher dividends, which often aligns with value stocks that have stable cash flows. MGV focuses on mega-capitalisation firms with value characteristics. This means neither fund aims to buy expensive growth stocks, but rather established firms whose share prices may not fully reflect their fundamental worth.

How do the top holdings of MGV and VYM demonstrate overlap?

There is significant overlap between the two funds' top ten lists. Common names include JPM, XOM, JNJ, ABBV, BAC and CSCO. This demonstrates that despite their distinct objectives, they invest in many of the same large, well-known companies. MGV might hold JPM at 4.41% while VYM holds it at 3.83%. This shared exposure suggests both funds provide a degree of diversification within the large-cap value segment of the market.

How do the inception dates of these ETFs compare?

MGV was launched on December 17, 2007, while VYM started on November 10, 2006. Both have long track records of over 15 years. This history provides substantial data on how they have performed through different market conditions. VYM's inception predates the global financial crisis, while MGV was launched shortly after its onset. These dates help investors contextualise the funds' operational maturity and market experience.

MGV vs VYM

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Analyse expense ratios (0.05% vs 0.04%), net assets ($13.9bn vs $80.9bn), dividend yields (1.85% vs 2.31%), and top holdings including JPM and XOM. Understand how each fund tracks its market focus. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

MGV

Metric

VYM

0.05%

Expense Ratio

0.04%

1.85%

Dividend Yield

2.31%

$13.87B

Net Assets

$80.88B

128

Holdings

613

Dec 17, 2007

Inception Date

Nov 10, 2006

–

Index Tracked

–

Large Value

Fund Category

Large Value

VYM costs about $1.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	MGV	VYM
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.	4.41%	3.83%
XOMExxonMobil Holdings Corporation	3.08%	2.69%
JNJJohnson & Johnson	2.96%	2.58%
ABBVAbbVie Inc.	2.09%	1.83%
BACBank of America Corporation	1.83%	1.65%
CSCOCisco Systems, Inc.	1.81%	1.76%

Discover More Comparisons

MGV vs VTV

Compare MGV and VTV. Review 0.05% vs 0.03% fees, assets, yields and holdings to assess large value ETF tracking differences in a neutral manner.

MGV vs VTI

Compare MGV vs VTI ETFs. Review expense ratios of 0.05% and 0.03%, dividend yields, top holdings and market segment tracking for factual analysis.

MGV vs SCHD

Compare MGV and SCHD ETFs. Review 0.05% vs 0.06% fees, 1.85% vs 3.11% yields, holdings differences, and tracking details for informed research.

Investment Analysis

MGV

Pros

The fund's expense ratio of 0.05% is very low
The net assets of $13.9 billion indicate liquidity
The fund has been open to investors since December 2007

Considerations

The dividend yield of 1.85% is lower than VYM
The top holding accounts for 5.00% of the fund
The index tracked is not available from the data

VYM

Pros

The fund's expense ratio of 0.04% is extremely low
The net assets of $80.9 billion support very strong liquidity
The dividend yield of 2.31% is higher than MGV

Considerations

The top holding weight of 6.93% introduces some concentration
The index tracked is not available from the provided data
The inception date of November 2006 is relatively long ago

About MGV and VYM

MGV (MGV)

The Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF is an exchange-traded fund designed to provide exposure to large-cap stocks that are considered undervalued relative to their peers. With a low expense ratio of 0.05%, this fund aims to offer cost-effective access to the value segment of the mega-cap market. It holds approximately 128 companies, focusing on firms with strong fundamentals that the market may have overlooked. Since its inception in December 2007, it has managed net assets of around USD 13.87 billion. The fund currently provides a dividend yield of 1.85%, making it a potential option for investors seeking value in large companies. However, like all investments, values can rise and fall, and returns are not guaranteed.

VYM (VYM)

The Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF is designed to provide investors with exposure to a broad range of high-dividend-paying stocks listed in the US. With a low expense ratio of 0.04% and over 600 holdings, the fund aims to deliver income while maintaining diversification. Its dividend yield sits at 2.31%, reflecting its focus on companies with strong payout traditions. This ETF suits those seeking a steady income stream as part of a long-term strategy, though values can rise and fall. Returns are not guaranteed. Always consider your personal circumstances before investing.

Buy MGV or VYM in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

MGV vs VYM

Fund Snapshot