What do the expense ratios mean for IXC and IYC?

Both the iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and the iShares US Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) have an expense ratio of 0.37%. This is the annual fee charged by the fund manager. Since the fees are identical, investors are not choosing between a cheaper or more expensive option here; the cost of holding either fund is the same. However, a 0.37% fee is relatively high compared to many broad-market passive ETFs, so understanding this cost relative to potential returns remains important for long-term planning.

How does sector concentration differ between IXC and IYC?

IXC concentrates on the global energy sector, with significant weights in major integrated companies like Exxon Mobil and Chevron. IYC focuses on the US consumer discretionary sector, featuring large holdings in companies like Amazon and Tesla. The energy fund's top holding represents 17.58% of the portfolio, indicating notable concentration risk. In contrast, IYC offers exposure to diverse consumer spending brands. These distinct sector focuses mean the funds react differently to economic cycles, with energy tied to commodity prices and consumer discretionary linked to household spending trends.

Are there any shared top holdings between IXC and IYC?

No, there is no overlap in the top ten holdings between the two funds. IXC’s top positions are primarily energy companies such as Exxon Mobil, Chevron, and ConocoPhillips. IYC’s largest holdings are consumer-centric firms like Amazon, Tesla, and Walmart. This complete lack of shared top holdings highlights how distinct these two investment exposures are. An investor holding both funds would gain diversification across fundamentally different economic drivers—global energy production versus US consumer spending behaviour—rather than duplicating the same companies.

How do the dividend yields of IXC and IYC compare?

IXC offers a dividend yield of 2.76%, reflecting the typically higher payouts from mature energy companies. IYC has a much lower yield of 0.54%, as many consumer discretionary firms, particularly in technology or high-growth areas, retain earnings for expansion rather than distributing them. This difference makes IXC more suitable for those prioritising income generation, while IYC’s lower yield suggests its potential returns may rely more heavily on capital appreciation. Investors should consider these yield disparities when evaluating total return expectations for each fund.

What investing goals are typically associated with IXC?

The iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) is often associated with goals related to income generation and exposure to commodity-driven sectors. Its 2.76% dividend yield and focus on global energy infrastructure appeal to investors seeking regular distributions. Additionally, it serves those looking to hedge against inflation or capitalise on energy price cycles. The fund’s $3.0 billion in net assets supports liquidity, making it a well-established option for those specifically targeting the energy sector as part of a broader diversified portfolio strategy.

What investing goals are typically associated with IYC?

The iShares US Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) is typically linked to goals centred on capital appreciation and exposure to consumer trends. With a low 0.54% dividend yield, it is less focused on income and more on growth from companies involved in non-essential spending. It suits investors betting on economic expansion and increased household consumption. The fund’s inception in June 2000 indicates longevity, providing access to a diverse range of brands, from retail giants to entertainment leaders, aligning with a growth-oriented investment horizon.

How do net assets impact liquidity for these ETFs?

IXC has net assets of $3.0 billion, while IYC has $1.1 billion. Generally, higher net assets contribute to better trading liquidity, meaning it may be easier to buy or sell large positions in IXC without significantly affecting the price. IYC’s smaller asset base is still substantial but could imply slightly wider bid-ask spreads during periods of high market volatility. While both funds are liquid enough for most retail investors, those trading larger volumes might find IXC’s deeper liquidity advantageous for smoother execution.

What factors primarily drive performance for IXC?

IXC performance is heavily influenced by global energy commodity prices, particularly crude oil and natural gas. As a global energy sector fund, it reacts to supply and demand dynamics, geopolitical events affecting energy infrastructure, and OPEC+ production decisions. The high concentration in integrated energy majors means it also responds to operational efficiency and downstream profitability. Investors in IXC are essentially taking a position on the health and price stability of the global energy markets, distinct from general equity market movements.

What economic conditions influence IYC?

IYC is sensitive to US consumer spending habits and economic growth cycles. As a consumer discretionary fund, it performs best when households have increased disposable income and are willing to spend on non-essential goods and services like retail, travel, and entertainment. Rising interest rates can negatively impact this sector by dampening consumer credit and spending. Conversely, economic expansions typically boost IYC holdings like Amazon and Tesla, making it a cyclical investment linked closely to the overall health of the US economy.

What does 'index tracked: not available' imply for these funds?

For both IXC and IYC, the specific index tracked is listed as 'not available' in the provided data. This prevents precise tracking analysis, such as calculating the exact benchmark the fund mimics. Without knowing the underlying index, investors cannot verify the fund’s tracking error or confirm if the methodology aligns with their expectations. This lack of transparency requires relying on the fund’s sector description and top holdings to understand its investment strategy, rather than a detailed breakdown of its benchmark composition.

Is this comparison financial advice for buying IXC or IYC?

No, this comparison is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It provides factual data on expense ratios, dividend yields, and holdings to help you understand the differences between the iShares Global Energy ETF and the iShares US Consumer Discretionary ETF. Investment decisions should be based on your personal financial situation, risk tolerance, and long-term goals. Always conduct your own due diligence or consult a qualified financial adviser before making any investment choices regarding these or other exchange-traded funds.

IXC vs IYC

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare IXC and IYC: fees, holdings, and dividends. Discover how each tracks its market with identical expense ratios. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

IXC

Metric

IYC

0.37%

Expense Ratio

0.37%

2.76%

Dividend Yield

0.54%

$2.98B

Net Assets

$1.15B

73

Holdings

161

Nov 12, 2001

Inception Date

Jun 12, 2000

–

Index Tracked

–

Equity Energy

Fund Category

Consumer Cyclical

Both funds charge the same annual fee.

Shared Top Holdings

These funds do not share any of their top holdings.

Discover More Comparisons

IXC vs XLE

Compare IXC and XLE ETFs. Analyse fees of 0.37% vs 0.08%, top holdings like XOM and CVX, and dividends of 2.76% vs 2.47% to decide which to research.

IXC vs VDE

Compare IXC and VDE ETFs on fees, holdings, dividends and tracking. Note: index data unavailable. Educational only, not advice. Neutral comparison.

Investment Analysis

IXC

Pros

The fund exhibits robust income generation with a dividend yield of 2.76 percent.
It provides access to the global energy sector through a mature and well-established product.
Significant assets under management of three billion dollars support trading liquidity.

Considerations

The top holding represents 17.58 percent of the portfolio, creating a considerable concentration risk.
An expense ratio of 0.37 percent is high for an equity ETF of this vintage.
The underlying index methodology is not available, complicating precise tracking analysis for investors.

IYC

Pros

The fund offers exposure to the US consumer discretionary sector with minimal sector overlap.
It has maintained an inception date of June 2000, indicating considerable operational longevity.
The portfolio provides access to a diverse range of consumer spending companies and brands.

Considerations

Net assets of 1.1 billion dollars are smaller than the energy fund, potentially affecting liquidity.
The dividend yield is very low at 0.54 percent, offering limited income for total return.
An expense ratio of 0.37 percent is relatively high compared to many passive ETFs.

Related Market Insights

US Consumer Spending: The Retail Revolution That's Reshaping Markets

Tap into the US consumer spending boom. Discover why sustained retail sales growth offers compelling investment opportunities across e-commerce & food services with Nemo.