What are the main similarities between the iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE)?

Both IXC and VDE are exchange-traded funds focused on the equity energy sector. They share nine identical companies in their top 10 holdings. Both include major names such as Exxon Mobil, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, Marathon Petroleum, Valero Energy, Phillips 66, Williams Companies, Schlumberger, and EOG Resources. These similarities indicate that both funds have substantial common exposure to some of the world’s largest energy firms, though differences in broader portfolio composition may exist.

What are the main differences between the iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE)?

IXC and VDE differ in several key respects. IXC offers a global energy mandate, including international integrated majors. VDE primarily focuses on U.S. listed energy firms. In terms of fees, IXC has a higher expense ratio (0.37%) compared to VDE (0.09%). IXC also offers a higher dividend yield (2.76%) compared to VDE (2.33%). VDE has significantly larger net assets at $10.9 billion, potentially offering better liquidity.

How does the top holding concentration differ between the iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE)?

In terms of top holding concentration, VDE has the two largest holdings, Exxon Mobil and Chevron, representing 35.85% of its portfolio, with a more extreme concentration in mega-cap stocks. IXC also features large top holdings, but Exxon Mobil and Chevron are weighted below 40% combined, which is still substantial but slightly less concentrated than VDE. However, IXC also exhibits extreme concentration, with over half its assets in the first ten companies.

How do the expense ratios of IXC and VDE compare, and what does this mean for long-term investors?

The expense ratio is the annual fee charged by an ETF. IXC has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than VDE’s 0.09% expense ratio. Over time, these differences in fees can erode returns, making the total cost of ownership a critical factor for long-term investors. VDE offers a significantly cheaper alternative, potentially leading to better net performance if other factors are equal.

What are the typical investing goals associated with choosing IXC vs VDE?

Investors choosing VDE may prioritise lower costs and potentially higher liquidity, as reflected in its lower expense ratio and larger net assets. This could suit a long-term, cost-conscious investing strategy. Those selecting IXC may seek global energy exposure, including international integrated majors, and potentially a higher income yield. Both funds serve investors with a specific focus on the energy sector, but with different characteristics.

What are the dividend yield differences between IXC and VDE?

IXC has a dividend yield of 2.76%, while VDE offers a 2.33% dividend yield. A higher dividend yield from IXC could potentially provide more income distributions to investors. It's crucial to remember that dividend yields can fluctuate based on the underlying holdings' payout behaviour and share prices. The choice between the two may depend on whether an investor prioritises income versus potentially lower fees.

How do the top holdings of IXC and VDE overlap, and what are the unique companies in each?

IXC and VDE share nine identical companies in their top 10 holdings: XOM, CVX, COP, MPC, VLO, PSX, WMB, SLB, and EOG. IXC includes TRGP at 1.64% in its top 10, which is not listed in VDE's. VDE's top 10 includes BKR at 2.31%, which is not in IXC's list. The differences reflect each fund's specific approach to stock selection and weighting within the energy sector.

How do the net assets of IXC and VDE affect investor experience?

VDE has significantly larger net assets at $10.9 billion compared to IXC's $3.0 billion. This suggests VDE may offer better liquidity, potentially leading to tighter bid-ask spreads when trading the ETF. IXC's smaller size could make it slightly less liquid, which might be a consideration for very active traders or those concerned about trading costs beyond the expense ratio.

What is the difference in geographic focus between IXC and VDE?

IXC has a global energy mandate, which means it broadens its exposure beyond domestic United States oil and gas firms to include international integrated majors. VDE, conversely, focuses on US-listed energy firms, which limits its geographic diversification compared to peers with global mandates. This difference in geographic scope is a primary differentiator in terms of market exposure.

What factors should I consider when comparing the iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE)?

When comparing IXC and VDE, investors should consider expense ratios, net asset value, dividend yields, top holdings, and geographic focus. IXC has a higher expense ratio and dividend yield but a smaller net asset value. VDE is cheaper, larger, and potentially more liquid, but has less top concentration. IXC provides broader global exposure. Investors should weigh these factors against their personal investment goals and risk tolerance.

What educational content should be considered when reviewing ETF comparison pages?

When reviewing ETF comparison pages, it is essential to understand that all content provided is educational in nature and not financial advice. Data such as expense ratios, dividend yields, and top holdings are for informational purposes only. Investors should always perform their own due diligence, considering their unique financial situation and investment objectives before making any decisions. Remember, market data is not static and can change over time.

What are some key considerations for beginners looking to invest in ETFs?

Beginners should focus on understanding fundamental ETF characteristics such as expense ratios, dividend yields, top holdings, and geographic focus. It is essential to compare these attributes against your personal financial goals and risk tolerance. For instance, higher dividend yields may provide more income distributions, while lower expense ratios can enhance net returns over time. Additionally, remember to perform independent research and consult financial advisors to make informed investment decisions.

IXC vs VDE

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE). This page examines fees, holdings, dividends and how each fund tracks its market. Note that index tracked data is not available for both funds. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

IXC

Metric

VDE

0.37%

Expense Ratio

0.09%

2.76%

Dividend Yield

2.33%

$2.98B

Net Assets

$10.94B

Holdings

117

Nov 12, 2001

Inception Date

Sep 23, 2004

–

Index Tracked

–

Equity Energy

Fund Category

Equity Energy

VDE costs about $28.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	IXC	VDE
XOMExxonMobil Holdings Corporation	17.58%	21.82%
CVXChevron Corporation	10.82%	14.03%
COPConocoPhillips	4.14%	5.99%
MPCMarathon Petroleum Corporation	3.12%	4.06%
VLOValero Energy Corporation	3.11%	3.98%
PSXPhillips 66	2.85%	3.67%
WMBThe Williams Companies, Inc.	2.30%	3.36%
SLBSLB N.V.	1.99%	3.36%
EOGEOG Resources, Inc.	1.98%	2.89%

Discover More Comparisons

IXC vs IYC

Compare IXC and IYC ETFs. Analyse fees, holdings, dividends, and tracking differences for global energy versus US consumer discretionary sectors.

IXC vs XLE

Compare IXC and XLE ETFs. Analyse fees of 0.37% vs 0.08%, top holdings like XOM and CVX, and dividends of 2.76% vs 2.47% to decide which to research.

FENY vs VDE

Compare FENY vs VDE energy ETFs. Review 0.08% vs 0.09% fees, dividends, holdings like XOM and CVX, tracking, net assets and inception dates.

Investment Analysis

IXC

Pros

IXC holds a global energy mandate, broadening exposure beyond domestic United States oil and gas firms to international integrated majors.
IXC offers a higher dividend yield of 2.76 percent, potentially providing stronger income distributions for investors compared to the benchmark energy fund.
The fund's largest top holdings of Exxon Mobil and Chevron are weighted below forty percent combined, offering slightly less extreme top-heavy concentration.

Considerations

The expense ratio of 0.37 percent is substantially higher than the Vanguard equivalent, eroding net returns for long-term holders over time.
With 3.0 billion dollars in net assets, IXC is significantly smaller than VDE, which may result in wider bid-ask trading spreads.
IXC exhibits extreme concentration in its top holdings, with over half its assets allocated to the first ten companies despite a global mandate.

VDE

Pros

VDE's 0.09 percent expense ratio provides exceptional cost efficiency for investors seeking a low-fee energy sector equity exposure.
The fund commands 10.9 billion dollars in assets, suggesting higher liquidity and tighter trading spreads for active market participants.
As a Vanguard product, it benefits from the issuer's broad reputation for low-cost, transparent, and tax-efficient indexing methods.

Considerations

VDE's portfolio is dominated by two mega-cap stocks, with Exxon Mobil and Chevron combined representing over thirty-five percent of total net assets.
The dividend yield of 2.33 percent is lower than the comparable global energy fund, offering reduced income for distribution-focused investors.
Its focus on US-listed energy firms limits geographic diversification compared to peers with global mandates.

About IXC and VDE

IXC (IXC)

The iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) offers investors diversified exposure to the global energy sector. Launched in November 2001, this fund holds approximately 73 companies involved in the exploration, development, production, and distribution of energy resources worldwide. With net assets of roughly USD 2.98 billion, it provides a cost-efficient way to access established energy giants and mid-cap players across multiple geographies. The fund carries an expense ratio of 0.37% and has recently offered a dividend yield of around 2.76%, reflecting the income potential typical of mature energy firms. As with any sector-specific investment, values can fluctuate significantly due to changes in commodity prices, geopolitical events, and shifts toward renewable energy. This ETF is designed for those seeking targeted sector exposure rather than broad market diversification. It is crucial to consider your personal financial goals and risk tolerance, as returns are not guaranteed and losses are possible.

VDE (VDE)

The Vanguard Energy ETF offers investors diversified exposure to the global energy sector. As a passively managed fund, it aims to track the performance of a broad energy industry benchmark by holding shares in leading energy companies worldwide. With an impressive low expense ratio of 0.09%, this fund provides a cost-effective way to gain sector-specific exposure while keeping fees minimal. Recent verified data highlights its strong position with USD 10.94 billion in net assets and 117 holdings, ensuring breadth and diversification within the energy space. It currently offers a competitive dividend yield of 2.33%, making it attractive for those looking to generate steady income alongside potential capital growth. Established in September 2004, this fund has a long track record, providing investors with a familiar tool to navigate the evolving energy landscape, from traditional resources to the energy transition.

Buy IXC or VDE in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

IXC vs VDE

Fund Snapshot