What is the main structural difference between AVLV and VTV?

AVLV uses a systematic active strategy focused on factors like profitability and valuation, whereas VTV is a passive fund tracking a large value index. This fundamental difference means AVLV aims to outperform by selecting specific stocks, while VTV seeks to match the returns of its benchmark. Investors should consider whether they prefer active management techniques or traditional index tracking.

How do the inception dates of these funds compare?

VTV launched in January 2004, providing over two decades of track record, which allows for long-term performance analysis. In contrast, AVLV was launched in September 2021, making it a newer fund with limited historical data. A longer track record can offer more insight into how a fund behaves across different market cycles, but does not guarantee future results.

How do the expense ratios of AVLV and VTV differ?

AVLV charges a 0.15% expense ratio, while VTV charges 0.03%. The difference is 0.12 percentage points. Over time, this fee differential can impact net returns. While 0.15% remains relatively low for active management, it is higher than the minimal cost of passive indexing. Investors often weigh the potential for active outperformance against this additional annual cost drag.

Are the top holdings of AVLV and VTV identical?

No, the top ten holdings differ significantly despite both being large-cap value funds. AVLV's largest positions include Microsoft and Meta, which are not in VTV's top ten. VTV's top holdings feature more traditional value names like JPMorgan and Berkshire Hathaway. This indicates AVLV may capture different aspects of the value factor, potentially including companies with strong profitability profiles that are priced attractively.

What types of investing goals are associated with these funds?

VTV is typically associated with goals seeking broad, low-cost exposure to the US large-cap value sector for core portfolio construction. AVLV is associated with goals aiming for factor-tilted exposure, where investors might seek potential outperformance through active rules-based selection of profitable value stocks. The choice depends on whether an investor prefers passive market exposure or active factor implementation, without any recommendation for either fund.

How do the dividend yields compare?

VTV offers a dividend yield of 1.85%, which is higher than AVLV's 1.11%. This difference reflects the composition of their portfolios. VTV holds more traditional cyclicals and financials like JPMorgan and Exxon, which often have higher payout ratios. AVLV's inclusion of tech-adjacent names like Microsoft and Meta, which pay lower dividends relative to their price, results in a slightly lower yield, though both provide income distributions.

How does net asset size affect trading for these funds?

VTV has net assets of $191.1 billion, compared to AVLV's $21.5 billion. While AVLV's assets indicate sufficient liquidity for most investors, VTV's massive size ensures extremely tight bid-ask spreads and high trading volume. Larger asset bases generally facilitate easier entry and exit at quoted prices, although both funds are well-established and liquid enough for typical retail and institutional trading needs.

Do the funds hold any shared stocks?

Yes, MU, JPM, and XOM are shared top-10 holdings in both portfolios. This overlap suggests that both funds identify certain companies as attractive value investments, likely due to low valuation multiples relative to their peers. However, the weightings differ; for example, MU is 3.13% in AVLV and 3.94% in VTV. Shared holdings do not mean the funds are identical, as the remaining positions vary significantly.

Is sector data available for these funds?

Current sector weight details are not available for either AVLV or VTV in the provided dataset. Without explicit sector breakdowns, investors must rely on top holdings to infer industry exposure. Both funds appear to hold financials, energy, and technology names. The lack of detailed sector data limits the ability to precisely compare industry risks or diversification levels directly from standard metrics.

What is the impact of fees on long-term returns?

The 0.12 percentage point difference between AVLV's 0.15% and VTV's 0.03% fees compounds over time. While small annually, these costs reduce the net value of the investment relative to gross performance. Investors must assess if the active strategy's potential outperformance justifies the higher cost. Past performance data for AVLV is limited due to its 2021 inception, making this assessment harder than for VTV.

How should beginners interpret the 'not available' data points?

When data such as the specific index tracked or sector weights are listed as 'not available', it means the source dataset does not provide that specific metric. Beginners should not assume the fund lacks an index or sectors, but rather that the detailed breakdown is missing from this comparison. Always seek official documentation for complete methodology and holdings information before making decisions.

Does comparing these funds constitute financial advice?

This comparison is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. The information provided helps readers understand differences in fees, holdings, and structures between AVLV and VTV. Investors should consider their own financial situation, risk tolerance, and goals, and consult with a qualified financial professional if they need personalized guidance. Past data and fund metrics do not predict future market performance.

AVLV vs VTV

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) by examining fees, holdings, dividends and how each fund tracks its market. AVLV carries a 0.15% expense ratio while VTV is 0.03%; both fall under the Large Value category with differing inception dates and net assets. This page provides a neutral overview of key data points to help you understand the distinctions between these two funds. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

AVLV

Metric

VTV

0.15%

Expense Ratio

0.03%

1.11%

Dividend Yield

1.85%

$21.49B

Net Assets

$191.07B

303

Holdings

319

Sep 21, 2021

Inception Date

Jan 26, 2004

–

Index Tracked

–

Large Value

Fund Category

Large Value

VTV costs about $12.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	AVLV	VTV
MUMicron Technology, Inc.	3.13%	3.94%
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.	2.74%	3.47%
XOMExxonMobil Holdings Corporation	2.42%	2.43%

Discover More Comparisons

AVLV vs AVUS

Compare AVLV and AVUS ETFs: both 0.15% fees, differing holdings, yields and tracking. Neutral overview of Avantis large-cap funds for research.

AVLV vs FNDX

Compare AVLV and FNDX on expense ratios (0.15% vs 0.25%), net assets, dividend yields, top holdings, and fundamental tracking methods for informed research.

AVLV vs CGDV

Compare AVLV and CGDV expense ratios, dividend yields, top holdings and tracking for US large value ETFs in this factual breakdown of key differences.

Investment Analysis

AVLV

Pros

Avantis employs a systematic active strategy focusing on profitability and valuation, offering distinct factor exposure.
Assets under management reached $21.5 billion, indicating robust investor confidence and sufficient liquidity for the fund.
The portfolio holds diversified large-cap value stocks like Microsoft and Meta, with a 1.11% dividend yield.

Considerations

The 0.15% expense ratio is five times higher than passive competitors, reducing net returns relative to cheaper options.
Launched in September 2021, the fund lacks the extended track record of older established value indices.
Specific sector weights and index methodology details are currently not available, limiting transparency for some investors.

VTV

Pros

The extremely low 0.03% expense ratio ensures minimal drag on returns compared to higher-cost active funds.
With $191.1 billion in net assets, the fund provides high liquidity and tight trading spreads for investors.
Launched in January 2004, VTV has a mature track record and a stable 1.85% dividend yield.

Considerations

The portfolio is heavily concentrated in traditional cyclicals like JPMorgan and Exxon, potentially lagging in tech-led markets.
Passive index tracking may include companies with deteriorating fundamentals until rebalancing, unlike active stock selection methods.
Detailed sector weights are not available in the current dataset, hindering precise risk assessment of industry exposures.

About AVLV and VTV

AVLV (AVLV)

The Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) is an exchange-traded fund designed to provide exposure to large-capitalisation companies in the United States that are considered undervalued relative to their fundamentals. Launched in September 2021, this fund seeks to capture the value factor, which historically suggests that cheaper stocks may outperform more expensive ones over long periods. With a low expense ratio of 0.15%, it offers a cost-efficient way for investors to diversify their portfolios within the US equity market. The fund holds over 300 companies, providing broad exposure while maintaining a focus on value metrics. Investors should note that while value stocks can offer attractive opportunities, they may underperform growth stocks during certain market cycles. As with any investment, values can rise and fall, and returns are not guaranteed.

VTV (VTV)

The Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) is a large-cap value fund designed to track the performance of US large-capitalisation companies considered to have value characteristics. Launched in January 2004, it currently holds a diverse portfolio of 319 stocks. With a very low expense ratio of just 0.03%, it offers investors a cost-effective way to access established US companies that may be trading at lower prices relative to their fundamental metrics. The fund has accumulated net assets of approximately USD 191.07 billion, indicating significant liquidity and investor confidence. It currently provides a dividend yield of 1.85%. While value strategies can offer potential advantages during market rotations, like all investments, the value of shares can fall as well as rise, and returns are not guaranteed. This fund is generally suitable for investors seeking diversified exposure to the US large-cap value segment as part of a broader portfolio strategy.

Buy AVLV or VTV in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

AVLV vs VTV

Fund Snapshot