XLBXME

XLB vs XME

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare XLB (Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund) and XME (S&P Metals and Mining SPDR ETF). This page details expense ratios, net assets, dividend yields, top holdings, and inception dates. Note that in...

Investment Analysis

XLB

XLB

XLB

Pros

  • XLB offers a low expense ratio of 0.08 per cent for a diversified materials sector fund.
  • The fund's high net assets of 8.1 billion dollars support strong liquidity and trading activity.
  • It delivers a relatively attractive dividend yield of 1.72 per cent for an equity ETF.

Considerations

  • Tracking the Materials Select Sector index limits exposure to non-US or broader industrial materials.
  • Concentration in top holdings like Linde at 11.57 per cent creates meaningful single-name risk.
  • Index methodology and sector weights are not available in the provided data, reducing transparency.
XME

XME

XME

Pros

  • XME provides focused exposure to metals and mining, distinct from the broader XLB materials universe.
  • Top holdings are more evenly weighted, with the largest position at 5.16 per cent of assets.
  • The fund has been established since June 2006, offering a long track record in sub-sector investing.

Considerations

  • Expense ratio is significantly higher at 0.35 per cent compared to broader sector ETFs.
  • Dividend yield is very low at 0.32 per cent, reflecting the capital-intensive nature of mining.
  • Net assets of 4.4 billion dollars are smaller than XLB, potentially implying lower trading volume.

Buy XLB or XME in Nemo

Nemo Logo Fade
🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

Frequently asked questions