VCRXLY

VCR vs XLY

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Explore a side-by-side comparison of the Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) and the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLY). We examine their expense ratios, net assets, dividend yi...

Investment Analysis

VCR

VCR

VCR

Pros

  • The expense ratio is 0.09%, providing cost-efficient access to the consumer discretionary sector.
  • With 0.76% dividend yield, the fund offers modest income alongside growth-oriented holdings.
  • It was established in January 2004, offering a long operational track record for investors.

Considerations

  • Top ten holdings include AMZN at 22.38%, creating significant concentration risk in this stock.
  • TSLA accounts for 15.40% of the fund, amplifying exposure to electric vehicle market volatility.
  • Net assets stand at 5.7 billion USD, smaller than major competitors, potentially affecting liquidity.
XLY

XLY

XLY

Pros

  • The expense ratio is 0.08%, making it marginally cheaper than Vanguard's equivalent offering.
  • It has 21.8 billion USD in net assets, ensuring high liquidity and trading volume.
  • It was launched in December 1998, providing over 25 years of sector performance history.

Considerations

  • AMZN comprises 23.36% of holdings, resulting in greater concentration than Vanguard's fund.
  • TSLA represents 17.79% of the fund, heightening reliance on the electric vehicle sector's performance.
  • HD accounts for 5.18%, contributing to a top-heavy portfolio with limited diversification breadth.

Buy VCR or XLY in Nemo

Nemo Logo Fade
🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

Frequently asked questions