What is the main difference in the investment strategies of SPHD and VYM?

SPHD and VYM employ different strategies to select stocks. SPHD focuses on high dividend yields within the S&P 500 but adds a low-volatility overlay to reduce risk. This aims to stabilise portfolio fluctuations. Conversely, VYM tracks a broad high-dividend yield index, selecting large-cap stocks with higher yields than the market average, without a specific volatility filter. SPHD prioritises defensive characteristics alongside income, while VYM targets dividend yield directly from a wider pool of large-cap companies.

Why does the expense ratio matter when comparing ETFs like SPHD and VYM?

The expense ratio is an annual fee charged by the fund, deducted from your returns. Comparing SPHD (0.30%) and VYM (0.04%) highlights a cost difference. A lower expense ratio, like VYM's, allows more of the fund's gross returns to be retained by shareholders. Over time, higher fees, such as SPHD's, can dampen net returns because they compound negatively, reducing the total wealth accumulation. This means the difference between the two fees can impact your investment performance over long periods.

How do the dividend yields of SPHD and VYM compare?

SPHD has a notably higher dividend yield of 4.95% compared to VYM's 2.31%. This indicates SPHD focuses on stocks paying more in distributions relative to their share price. VYM, while classified as a high-dividend fund, has a lower yield in this specific comparison, often reflecting its broader market focus and inclusion of large-cap companies that may reinvest profits. Investors should note that a higher yield may attract those seeking immediate income, but it does not guarantee total return.

What are the top holdings and how do they differ between the two funds?

SPHD's top holding is PFE at 3.46%, followed by VZ and GIS, with a portfolio concentrated in established companies like utilities and consumer staples. VYM's largest holding is AVGO at 6.93%, which represents a higher single-stock weight than SPHD's top holding, followed by JPM and XOM. VYM holds a larger position in its top stock. The funds do not share any top-10 holdings, highlighting their distinct approaches to selecting dividend-paying stocks within the large-cap universe.

How do the fund sizes compare, and why does this matter?

VYM has substantial net assets of $80.9 billion, compared to SPHD's $3.3 billion. A larger asset base generally supports greater liquidity and operational efficiency, which can help maintain low costs. While SPHD has a moderate size, VYM's massive scale reflects high investor adoption. Larger funds often benefit from tighter bid-ask spreads, reducing trading costs, and offer robustness against fund closures. However, fund size alone does not determine investment success but relates to liquidity and tracking efficiency.

What does the 'low volatility' aspect of SPHD imply?

SPHD incorporates a 'low volatility' filter alongside high dividend yields. This overlay aims to select stocks that fluctuate less than the broader market, seeking to reduce portfolio risk. It prioritises defensive characteristics, often involving utilities and consumer staples, to protect capital during market downturns. This differentiates SPHD from VYM, which does not have this specific volatility screen. The approach is intended to provide income while moderating the overall risk profile compared to a purely yield-based strategy.

What is the historical performance data for these ETFs based on their inception?

VYM was launched in November 2006, providing a long operating history of over 19 years. This allows for extensive analysis of its performance across various market cycles. In contrast, SPHD was launched in October 2012, offering a shorter history of approximately 14 years. While both have operated for over a decade, VYM's longer track record provides more extensive data for investors studying how the fund behaves over time, particularly during different economic conditions and market events.

How transparent are the methodologies of these funds regarding their indices?

According to the data, the specific index tracked by both funds is not available, and detailed information on their index tracking methodology is limited. This impacts transparency because investors cannot fully analyse the precise rules governing stock selection and weightings. While SPHD is associated with an S&P 500 high-dividend low-volatility strategy, and VYM with a high-dividend yield focus, the absence of detailed index rules makes it challenging to predict exactly how portfolio adjustments will occur compared to other funds.

Which fund might be suitable for an investor focused on maximising current income?

SPHD is typically associated with strategies aimed at generating substantial current income. With a dividend yield of 4.95%, it is often used by those seeking larger cash distributions. VYM provides a lower yield of 2.31%. While both are categorised as 'High Dividend', SPHD's higher yield indicates its focus on stocks with higher payout rates relative to share price. This distinction is crucial for investors prioritising regular cash flow from their investment rather than total return.

Are there any important disclaimers regarding these investment comparisons?

This comparison is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, a recommendation to buy or sell, or a forecast of future performance. The figures provided, such as yields and expense ratios, are historical data points that may change over time. Index tracking methodologies and sector weights were not available for the analysed funds. Always conduct comprehensive research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

SPHD vs VYM

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in October 2026.

Compare SPHD and VYM on fees, holdings, dividends and how each tracks the market. SPHD has a 0.30% expense ratio and a 4.95% yield, with $3.3bn in assets. VYM, from Vanguard, has a 0.04% expense ratio and a 2.31% yield, with $80.9bn in assets. Note: Index tracked is not available for either. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

SPHD

Metric

VYM

0.30%

Expense Ratio

0.04%

4.95%

Dividend Yield

2.31%

$3.32B

Net Assets

$80.88B

Holdings

613

Oct 18, 2012

Inception Date

Nov 10, 2006

–

Index Tracked

–

Large Value

Fund Category

Large Value

VYM costs about $26.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

These funds do not share any of their top holdings.

Discover More Comparisons

SPHD vs SPLV

Compare SPHD and SPLV ETFs. Review 0.30% vs 0.25% fees, 4.95% vs 2.28% yields, top holdings and net assets for an informed view of each fund.

SPHD vs VOO

Compare SPHD and VOO ETFs. Review expense ratios, top holdings, dividend yields and index tracking. SPHD focuses on high dividend, low volatility stocks.

SPHD vs SPYD

Compare SPHD and SPYD on fees, holdings, dividends, and tracking. Review net assets, yields, and inception dates for an informed ETF decision.

Investment Analysis

SPHD

Pros

SPHD offers a distinct low-volatility overlay within the high-dividend space, aiming to reduce overall portfolio risk compared to standard value strategies.
With a 4.95% yield and large-cap focus, it generates substantial current income while maintaining exposure to established, often defensive, S&P 500 constituents.
Its portfolio is notably diversified across the S&P 500, as evidenced by a moderate 3.46% weight in its top holding, PFE, avoiding extreme concentration.

Considerations

The 0.30% expense ratio is significantly higher than the 0.04% cost of similar high-dividend alternatives, which may dampen net returns over extended investment horizons.
Limited data on its index tracking methodology makes it harder for investors to fully understand the specific rules governing constituent selection and weightings.
The fund's inception date in late 2012 means it has a relatively shorter operating history compared to some established peers in the high-dividend category.

VYM

Pros

VYM benefits from Vanguard's highly reputable issuer status and massive asset base of $80.9 billion, which supports strong liquidity and robust operational stability.
Its exceptionally low 0.04% expense ratio represents a major cost efficiency advantage, allowing more of its gross returns to be retained for shareholders.
The fund's long track record since its 2006 inception provides extensive historical data for performance and behavioural analysis, a factor attractive to many investors.

Considerations

With a dividend yield of 2.31%, it provides a less substantial income stream than many high-yield alternatives, potentially disappointing investors seeking maximum distributions.
Its top holding, AVGO, carries a substantial 6.93% weight, indicating a higher level of concentration risk compared to funds with more evenly distributed portfolios.
Information on its specific index tracking methodology is not available, which limits transparency regarding the precise stock selection criteria used within the portfolio.

Related Market Insights

Fortress Dividends: The Defensive Income Strategy That Actually Works

Discover Fortress Dividends, a defensive strategy for reliable income. Invest in financially robust companies that deliver sustainable dividends through economic storms.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

25 July 2025

Read Insight

Related Market Insights

Fortress Dividends: The Defensive Income Strategy That Actually Works

Discover Fortress Dividends, a defensive strategy for reliable income. Invest in financially robust companies that deliver sustainable dividends through economic storms.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

25 July 2025

Read Insight

About SPHD and VYM

SPHD (SPHD)

PowerShares S&P 500 High Div Low Vol ETF (SPHD) is an exchange-traded fund that seeks to provide exposure to S&P 500 companies with relatively high dividend yields and lower historical price volatility. The fund typically holds a concentrated basket of large-cap US stocks selected for income and stability, and it rebalances periodically to maintain its target characteristics. Investors often consider SPHD for income generation within an equity sleeve, but dividend payments and share prices can fluctuate and are not guaranteed. The ETF may be overweight in income-sensitive sectors such as utilities, real estate and consumer staples, which can affect performance during different market cycles. This information is general and educational, not personalised financial advice; suitability depends on your goals, time horizon and risk tolerance.

VYM (VYM)

The Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF is designed to provide investors with exposure to a broad range of high-dividend-paying stocks listed in the US. With a low expense ratio of 0.04% and over 600 holdings, the fund aims to deliver income while maintaining diversification. Its dividend yield sits at 2.31%, reflecting its focus on companies with strong payout traditions. This ETF suits those seeking a steady income stream as part of a long-term strategy, though values can rise and fall. Returns are not guaranteed. Always consider your personal circumstances before investing.

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Fortress Dividends

Discover companies with rock-solid financial foundations that deliver stable, dependable dividend income. These carefully selected stocks have been chosen by our investment experts for their ability to provide reliable payouts while maintaining strong balance sheets.

Published: 17 June 2025

Explore Basket

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Fortress Dividends

Published: 17 June 2025

Explore Basket

Buy SPHD or VYM in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

SPHD vs VYM

Fund Snapshot