What is the fundamental difference between a strategy-based ETF like SPHD and a benchmark-tracking ETF like VOO?

VOO is designed to replicate the S&P 500 index, holding all stocks in proportion to their market capitalisation for broad market exposure. SPHD, by contrast, follows a specific strategy: it screens the S&P 500 to select companies with high dividend yields and lower volatility. This means SPHD does not hold every S&P 500 stock, but rather a subset chosen for income and defensive characteristics, resulting in a much more concentrated portfolio compared to VOO’s comprehensive index replication.

How do the expense ratios of SPHD and VOO compare, and what does the difference mean for investors?

VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03%, which is extremely low for a core equity holding. SPHD has an expense ratio of 0.30%, reflecting the higher costs of managing its specific screening process. Over time, this 0.27 percentage point difference compounds. While 0.27% seems minor annually, consistent fee differences impact net returns, especially over long holding periods. VOO’s lower fee structure allows investors to keep more of the underlying index’s gross return, whereas SPHD’s higher fee is the cost of accessing its targeted high-dividend, low-volatility strategy.

How do the top holdings of SPHD and VOO differ, and what does this reveal about their portfolios?

The top 10 holdings of SPHD and VOO have zero overlap. VOO’s largest positions are technology and consumer discretionary giants like NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT, reflecting the market-cap weighting of the S&P 500. SPHD’s top 10 features defensive, income-oriented firms such as PFE, VZ, and MO. This stark difference highlights how VOO provides growth-oriented, broad exposure, while SPHD deliberately tilts toward stable, mature companies that typically pay higher dividends and exhibit less price volatility, often found in sectors like healthcare, consumer staples, and telecoms.

What are the dividend yields for SPHD and VOO, and how do ETF distributions actually work?

SPHD has a significantly higher dividend yield of 4.95% compared to VOO’s 1.03%, a result of its high-dividend screening strategy. However, a higher yield does not guarantee better total returns. ETFs like these collect dividends from their underlying holdings and typically distribute them to shareholders quarterly. The yield is based on recent distributions and current price; it can change. VOO’s lower yield reflects its broader inclusion of growth companies that pay little or no dividends, while SPHD concentrates on firms that prioritise cash returns to shareholders.

What does 'low volatility' mean in the context of SPHD’s name, and how does it affect the portfolio?

‘Low volatility’ refers to a risk-reduction strategy that selects stocks historically exhibiting smaller price fluctuations compared to the broader market. In SPHD’s case, this is combined with a high-dividend screen within the S&P 500 universe. The goal is to create a portfolio that potentially experiences shallower drawdowns during market stress. This differs fundamentally from VOO, which provides raw exposure to all S&P 500 stocks, including highly volatile growth names. The low-volatility tilt in SPHD results in a distinct sector and style profile, leaning towards defensive value.

How does the size and scale of SPHD and VOO compare, and why does it matter?

VOO is one of the largest ETFs globally, with net assets of $1.08 trillion, indicating immense liquidity and institutional adoption. SPHD is substantially smaller at $3.3 billion. For beginners, this scale matters because it impacts bid-ask spreads and the ability to trade large positions with minimal market impact. VOO’s massive size generally translates to extremely tight spreads. While SPHD’s $3.3 billion is still a healthy fund size, the trading experience might differ slightly, though likely not materially for most retail investors.

Based on their inception dates, how much historical track record do SPHD and VOO have?

VOO has a longer track record, having launched on 7 September 2010. SPHD began later, on 18 October 2012. Both funds have therefore existed through multiple market cycles, including several bull and bear markets. A longer history allows investors to observe how a fund behaves in various conditions. In this case, both provide over a decade of performance data, which is generally considered sufficient for evaluating an index-based strategy like VOO and a factor-tilted strategy like SPHD against real-world outcomes.

Which investing goal is typically associated with SPHD versus VOO?

These funds serve different primary objectives. SPHD is often associated with an income-focused or defensive strategy. Investors targeting this fund typically seek to generate a higher current cash flow from dividends while potentially reducing portfolio volatility. VOO is associated with broad, long-term capital appreciation. Its goal is to mirror the total return of the entire U.S. large-cap market, accepting the inherent volatility of growth-oriented stocks for the opportunity of full market participation.

What sectors do SPHD and VOO appear to favour based on their top holdings?

While exact sector weights are not available for these funds, the top holdings provide a clear indication of sector tilts. VOO’s top holdings are heavily concentrated in Information Technology (NVDA, AAPL, MSFT) and Communication Services/Materials (GOOGL, AVGO), reflecting the S&P 500’s current leadership. SPHD’s top holdings cluster in Healthcare (PFE), Communication Services/Telecoms (VZ, T, CMCSA), Consumer Staples (GIS, KHC), and Real Estate (VICI, CCI). This suggests SPHD tilts toward traditionally defensive and income-generating sectors rather than the high-growth tech sectors dominating VOO.

Is sector weight data available for comparing SPHD and VOO?

No, current sector weight data is not available in our dataset for either SPHD or VOO. While their categories are listed as Large Value for SPHD and Large Blend for VOO, precise percentages for each sector like technology, healthcare, or financials cannot be compared using this source. This is a notable data gap. Investors looking for a detailed sector breakdown would need to consult the providers’ official documentation, such as Vanguard’s fund page or Invesco’s fund page for SPHD, to get this crucial diversification detail.

Is there any disclaimer or important context provided for this ETF comparison?

Yes, the comparison is explicitly for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Key data gaps exist, most notably the lack of sector weights and index tracking details for both funds. This information focuses on understanding how to interpret the provided facts—such as expense ratios, holdings overlap, and yields—rather than recommending a purchase. It reminds investors that a high-dividend strategy with lower volatility characteristics (SPHD) serves a different goal than broad market cap-weighted growth exposure (VOO).

Where can investors find official fund documentation to fill gaps like sector weights?

To supplement the provided data, which notes missing sector weights and index details, investors should visit the fund issuers’ official websites. For VOO, Vanguard publishes detailed prospectuses and daily portfolio holdings. For SPHD, while the issuer field is unavailable in our dataset, this fund is managed by Invesco (formerly PowerShares), whose website provides comprehensive fact sheets and sector breakdowns. These primary sources offer the transparency needed to fully understand the diversification, risks, and exact composition of each fund beyond the top 10 holdings comparison.

SPHD vs VOO

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in October 2026.

Compare SPHD and VOO. Review expense ratios, holdings, dividends and how each tracks its market. SPHD targets high-dividend, low-volatility S&P 500 companies at 0.30%, while VOO offers broad S&P 500 exposure at 0.03%. Note: Sector weights and index tracking details are not available. Educational content, not financial advice.

Compare SPHD and VOO. Review expense ratios, holdings, dividends and how each tracks its market. SPHD targets high-dividend, low-volatility S&P 500 companies at 0.30%, while VOO offers broad S&P 500 e...

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

SPHD

Metric

VOO

0.30%

Expense Ratio

0.03%

4.95%

Dividend Yield

1.03%

$3.32B

Net Assets

$1.08T

58

Holdings

516

Oct 18, 2012

Inception Date

Sep 7, 2010

–

Index Tracked

–

Large Value

Fund Category

Large Blend

VOO costs about $27.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

These funds do not share any of their top holdings.

Discover More Comparisons

SPHD vs SPLV

Compare SPHD and SPLV ETFs. Review 0.30% vs 0.25% fees, 4.95% vs 2.28% yields, top holdings and net assets for an informed view of each fund.

SPHD vs VYM

Compare SPHD and VYM ETFs on 0.30% and 0.04% fees, 4.95% and 2.31% yields, holdings, and index tracking. Factual data for investor research.

SPHD vs SPYD

Compare SPHD and SPYD on fees, holdings, dividends, and tracking. Review net assets, yields, and inception dates for an informed ETF decision.

Investment Analysis

SPHD

Pros

],
cons
]

Considerations

],
cons
]

VOO

Pros

],
cons
]

Considerations

],
cons
]

Related Market Insights

Fortress Dividends: The Defensive Income Strategy That Actually Works

Discover Fortress Dividends, a defensive strategy for reliable income. Invest in financially robust companies that deliver sustainable dividends through economic storms.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

25 July 2025

Read Insight

Related Market Insights

Fortress Dividends: The Defensive Income Strategy That Actually Works

Discover Fortress Dividends, a defensive strategy for reliable income. Invest in financially robust companies that deliver sustainable dividends through economic storms.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

25 July 2025

Read Insight

About SPHD and VOO

SPHD (SPHD)

PowerShares S&P 500 High Div Low Vol ETF (SPHD) is an exchange-traded fund that seeks to provide exposure to S&P 500 companies with relatively high dividend yields and lower historical price volatility. The fund typically holds a concentrated basket of large-cap US stocks selected for income and stability, and it rebalances periodically to maintain its target characteristics. Investors often consider SPHD for income generation within an equity sleeve, but dividend payments and share prices can fluctuate and are not guaranteed. The ETF may be overweight in income-sensitive sectors such as utilities, real estate and consumer staples, which can affect performance during different market cycles. This information is general and educational, not personalised financial advice; suitability depends on your goals, time horizon and risk tolerance.

VOO (VOO)

VOO is Vanguard’s exchange-traded fund designed to track the S&P 500 Index, offering broad exposure to about 500 of the largest publicly traded US companies. It aims to replicate the index’s performance minus fees by holding the same stocks in similar proportions, making it a straightforward, passive way to access large‑cap US equities. Investors commonly use VOO as a core holding for long‑term growth or as a simple building block in a diversified portfolio. It typically offers high liquidity and regular dividend distributions from underlying companies. As with any equity investment, VOO’s value can rise or fall with the market, and past performance is not a guide to future returns. Fees, trading costs and potential tracking error reduce returns slightly. This information is general and educational only and not personalised financial advice — consider your own circumstances or speak to a qualified adviser before investing.

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Fortress Dividends

Discover companies with rock-solid financial foundations that deliver stable, dependable dividend income. These carefully selected stocks have been chosen by our investment experts for their ability to provide reliable payouts while maintaining strong balance sheets.

Published: 17 June 2025

Explore Basket