What is the primary objective of the S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD)?

SPHD, or the PowerShares S&P 500 High Div Low Vol ETF, is designed to provide investors with access to high-dividend-yielding stocks within the S&P 500 that exhibit lower volatility. This dual focus aims to balance income generation with reduced market fluctuations, appealing to those seeking steady returns while mitigating risk. Fundamentally, SPHD targets large value companies, combining the stability of low-volatility metrics with the attractive payouts typical of higher-dividend stocks, thus catering to income-focused investors who prioritise both safety and yield in their portfolio strategies.

How does the S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) define its investment approach?

The S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) selects stocks from the S&P 500 with historically low price volatility, aiming to reduce overall portfolio risk while maintaining growth potential. By focusing on the least volatile stocks, SPLV provides a defensive stance, suitable for investors concerned with market downturns. Despite its low volatility, SPLV includes substantial holdings like utilities and consumer staples, offering some dividend yield but prioritising price stability. This strategy benefits those looking to safeguard their capital while participating in equity market returns.

Which fund charges a higher fee, and how does this impact long-term returns?

SPHD charges an expense ratio of 0.30%, while SPLV charges 0.25%. The difference of 0.05% may seem negligible, but over time, it can significantly impact long-term returns. Higher fees reduce the net gains from investments, compounding negatively. For instance, on a $10,000 investment, an additional 0.05% fee could result in a loss of $5 per year, growing more pronounced with larger investments and longer periods. Thus, when evaluating returns, the cost difference becomes a critical factor for investors comparing SPHD and SPLV.

What are the main differences in dividend yields between SPHD and SPLV?

SPHD offers a dividend yield of 4.95%, while SPLV yields 2.28%. SPHD’s higher yield indicates it is structured to appeal to income-focused investors, as it pays more in dividends relative to its price. Conversely, SPLV offers lower dividends, reflecting its focus on minimizing volatility rather than maximizing income. This yield gap is substantial, with SPHD providing more than double the yield of SPLV. Investors choosing between these funds should consider whether they prioritize high dividends or lower price volatility, as these funds represent different investment strategies and outcomes.

How do SPHD and SPLV differ regarding liquidity and fund size?

SPHD has net assets of $3.3 billion, whereas SPLV boasts $7.2 billion. Fund size impacts liquidity, with SPLV offering superior liquidity and stability due to its larger asset base. While both funds provide ample liquidity for institutional and retail investors, SPLV’s greater size can lead to narrower bid-ask spreads, reducing transaction costs. Investors may prefer SPLV for its liquidity advantage, which can be critical during market volatility. Both funds are established with long histories, providing investors with confidence in their stability and operational efficiency.

Which fund has a more diversified top holdings list, and what does this imply for risk?

SPLV’s top holdings, such as BRK.B and FE, have weights under 1.41%, indicating better diversification and less single-stock risk compared to SPHD. SPHD’s top holdings, including PFE and VZ, have weights ranging from 2.42% to 3.46%, presenting greater concentration risk. A more diversified portfolio like SPLV’s reduces reliance on individual stock performance, potentially offering more stable returns. Conversely, SPHD’s higher concentration means its performance is more sensitive to the outcomes of specific holdings, making it potentially riskier for conservative investors.

What is the historical track record of SPHD and SPLV, and how does this influence investment decisions?

SPHD launched in October 2012, providing a 13-year track record, while SPLV began in May 2011, offering 15 years of performance history. Although SPLV has a slightly longer history, both funds are established with substantial track records that provide investors with reliable performance data for analysis. A longer history allows investors to better assess how the funds have performed under different market conditions. Both funds' extensive histories offer valuable insights, though their performance will continue to be shaped by future market dynamics, which will be crucial for ongoing investment evaluations.

Do SPHD and SPLV share any of their top ten holdings?

Based on the available data, there are no shared top-10 holdings between SPHD and SPLV. SPHD’s top holdings include companies like PFE and VZ, whereas SPLV includes stocks like BRK.B and FE, which are entirely distinct. The absence of overlap highlights the different investment strategies and stock selection methods used by each fund. SPHD focuses on high dividends and low volatility, while SPLV prioritizes low volatility without necessarily seeking higher dividends. This distinct separation allows investors to diversify their holdings across both funds without duplicating exposure to specific companies.

What are the main drawbacks of SPHD in terms of sector diversification?

SPHD's primary drawback is that sector weight data is not available, which limits its transparency and analysis in terms of diversification within the large value category. While SPHD offers a compelling dividend yield and a solid track record, the lack of detailed sector weight information makes it challenging to fully assess how diversified the fund is. Investors cannot ascertain the sector concentration risk directly, which may impact their confidence in managing portfolio risks effectively. Therefore, a comprehensive sector breakdown would significantly enhance the attractiveness of SPHD for investors focused on sector diversification.

What are the educational limitations when comparing SPHD and SPLV without full sector data?

Comparing SPHD and SPLV without full sector data presents challenges, as sector weight information is unavailable for both funds. This absence limits the ability to thoroughly evaluate how well-diversified each fund is across different sectors of the market. Investors cannot easily determine if either fund is overweight in certain sectors, which is critical for assessing risk and return profiles. The lack of sector data can make comparisons less precise and may require investors to rely on historical performance and other metrics to gauge each fund’s suitability for their portfolio, rather than detailed sector diversification insights.

What should an investor keep in mind regarding the expense ratio of SPLV?

Investors should consider the expense ratio of SPLV, which stands at 0.25%. While this is lower than SPHD’s 0.30%, even seemingly small differences in fees can significantly impact long-term investment returns. The expense ratio reduces the net return on investments over time, particularly with larger amounts and longer horizons. Thus, a lower expense ratio is attractive for cost-conscious investors. However, it is essential to consider other factors alongside the expense ratio, such as dividend yield, liquidity, and fund strategy, to determine the best fit for individual investment goals and risk tolerances.

What disclaimer should be added to the educational content comparing SPHD and SPLV?

Educational content comparing SPHD and SPLV should include a disclaimer clarifying that this material is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Investors should conduct their own research or consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions. While the content aims to provide a neutral and factual overview of the funds, it may not cover all aspects of each fund's performance and strategy. Investment decisions should consider individual financial situations, risk tolerance, and long-term goals.

SPHD vs SPLV

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in October 2026.

Compare the S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) with the S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV). Review expense ratios, net assets, dividend yields and top holdings to understand how each fund tracks its market segment. Educational content, not financial advice.

Compare the S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) with the S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV). Review expense ratios, net assets, dividend yields and top holdings to understand how each fund ...

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

SPHD

Metric

SPLV

0.30%

Expense Ratio

0.25%

4.95%

Dividend Yield

2.28%

$3.32B

Net Assets

$7.19B

58

Holdings

107

Oct 18, 2012

Inception Date

May 5, 2011

–

Index Tracked

–

Large Value

Fund Category

Large Value

SPLV costs about $5.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

These funds do not share any of their top holdings.

Discover More Comparisons

SPHD vs VOO

Compare SPHD and VOO ETFs. Review expense ratios, top holdings, dividend yields and index tracking. SPHD focuses on high dividend, low volatility stocks.

SPHD vs VYM

Compare SPHD and VYM ETFs on 0.30% and 0.04% fees, 4.95% and 2.31% yields, holdings, and index tracking. Factual data for investor research.

SPHD vs SPYD

Compare SPHD and SPYD on fees, holdings, dividends, and tracking. Review net assets, yields, and inception dates for an informed ETF decision.

Investment Analysis

SPHD

Pros

SPHD offers a high dividend yield of 4.95% per the fund data, appealing to income-focused investors.
With net assets of $3.3 billion, SPHD provides substantial liquidity for institutional and retail investors.
Since its inception in October 2012, SPHD has a long track record of over 13 years for performance analysis.

Considerations

The 0.30% expense ratio is higher than the 0.25% for SPLV, increasing costs for investors.
Top holdings like PFE and VZ are weighted between 2.42% and 3.46%, potentially creating concentration risks.
Sector weights data is not available, limiting analysis of diversification benefits within the large value category.

SPLV

Pros

SPLV charges a lower expense ratio of 0.25% per the fund data, reducing costs for investors.
With net assets of $7.2 billion, SPLV offers superior liquidity and stability for investors.
Its top holdings are all under 1.41%, enhancing diversification and reducing single-stock risk compared to SPHD.

Considerations

The dividend yield is 2.28%, which is less than half of SPHD's, offering reduced income potential.
SPLV has a long history since its inception in May 2011, with performance spanning over 15 years.
Absence of available sector weight data limits understanding of the ETF's sector allocation and diversification.

Related Market Insights

Fortress Dividends: The Defensive Income Strategy That Actually Works

Discover Fortress Dividends, a defensive strategy for reliable income. Invest in financially robust companies that deliver sustainable dividends through economic storms.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

25 July 2025

Read Insight

Related Market Insights

Fortress Dividends: The Defensive Income Strategy That Actually Works

Discover Fortress Dividends, a defensive strategy for reliable income. Invest in financially robust companies that deliver sustainable dividends through economic storms.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

25 July 2025

Read Insight

About SPHD and SPLV

SPHD (SPHD)

PowerShares S&P 500 High Div Low Vol ETF (SPHD) is an exchange-traded fund that seeks to provide exposure to S&P 500 companies with relatively high dividend yields and lower historical price volatility. The fund typically holds a concentrated basket of large-cap US stocks selected for income and stability, and it rebalances periodically to maintain its target characteristics. Investors often consider SPHD for income generation within an equity sleeve, but dividend payments and share prices can fluctuate and are not guaranteed. The ETF may be overweight in income-sensitive sectors such as utilities, real estate and consumer staples, which can affect performance during different market cycles. This information is general and educational, not personalised financial advice; suitability depends on your goals, time horizon and risk tolerance.

SPLV (SPLV)

SPLV (Invesco S&P 500® Low Volatility ETF) is an exchange-traded fund that seeks to offer S&P 500 exposure with reduced price swings. The fund tracks a rules-based index that selects stocks from the S&P 500 with lower historical volatility and weights them to favour more stable names. Investors often consider SPLV when they want equity market participation but hope for a smoother ride compared with the full S&P 500. It can act as a defensive sleeve within a diversified portfolio, but it is still subject to market risk — returns can fall and are not guaranteed. SPLV’s strategy may underperform in strong bull markets where higher-volatility stocks lead, and its sector and factor tilts can differ from the broad market. Suitable for investors seeking lower short‑term volatility and prepared for equity risk over the medium to long term, it is educational to compare fees, tracking error and holdings before investing.

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Fortress Dividends

Discover companies with rock-solid financial foundations that deliver stable, dependable dividend income. These carefully selected stocks have been chosen by our investment experts for their ability to provide reliable payouts while maintaining strong balance sheets.

Published: 17 June 2025

Explore Basket