

SCHD vs WDIV
Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in October 2026.
Compare SCHD and WDIV on this ETF page. We examine fees, holdings and dividends, and how each fund tracks its market. SCHD by Schwab (0.06% expense, $112.8bn) vs WDIV by SPDR (0.40% expense, $285m). Note: WDIV yields 4.17% vs SCHD's 3.11%. Sector data unavailable. Educational content, not financial advice.
Compare SCHD and WDIV on this ETF page. We examine fees, holdings and dividends, and how each fund tracks its market. SCHD by Schwab (0.06% expense, $112.8bn) vs WDIV by SPDR (0.40% expense, $285m). N...
Investment Analysis

SCHD
SCHD
Pros
- Schwab offers an unusually low expense ratio of 0.06 percent.
- The fund holds 112.8 billion dollars, supporting strong liquidity.
- Ten-year performance reflects its October 2011 inception and established dividend history.
Considerations
- The 3.11 percent dividend yield is lower than many income-focused alternatives.
- Sector allocation data is not available, limiting transparency for sector-specific investors.
- The fund follows a proprietary index methodology not named in the data.

WDIV
WDIV
Pros
- A 4.17 percent yield offers higher current income than the first fund.
- Invests in global large value stocks, providing geographic diversification.
- Extremely broad exposure with no single holding exceeding 1.58 percent.
Considerations
- The 0.40 percent expense ratio is higher than the first fund.
- Only 285 million dollars in assets reduces liquidity.
- Since inception in 2013, the fund has a shorter track record.
Buy SCHD or WDIV in Nemo
Zero Commission
Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.
Trusted & Regulated
Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.
6% Interest on Cash
Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.


