What is the primary difference between REET and VNQ?

The primary difference lies in their market focus. REET (iShares Global REIT ETF) provides global exposure to real estate investment trusts, whereas VNQ (Vanguard Real Estate ETF) focuses exclusively on the United States. This distinction is crucial for investors seeking either international diversification or a concentrated domestic real estate portfolio. While both funds hold similar top names like WELL and PLD, REET may include non-US properties, potentially altering its risk and return profile compared to the strictly US-based VNQ. This geographic scope significantly impacts how each fund reacts to global versus local economic shifts.

How do the expense ratios of these two funds compare?

REET has an expense ratio of 0.14%, while VNQ is slightly lower at 0.13%. This represents a 0.01 percentage point difference annually. Although small, this variance can compound over extended investment horizons, marginally affecting net returns. VNQ's lower fee structure is generally advantageous for long-term hold strategies, assuming all other factors remain equal. However, investors should note that the absolute cost impact of 0.01% is minimal on moderate investment amounts. The fee difference is less significant than the underlying portfolio composition and global versus domestic exposure, which drives the primary performance variance between the two funds.

Which fund offers higher liquidity for traders?

VNQ offers significantly higher liquidity due to its larger asset base. With $36.9 billion in net assets, VNQ typically exhibits tighter bid-ask spreads and higher daily trading volumes compared to REET, which holds $4.7 billion. This substantial difference in fund size makes VNQ more suitable for active traders or those executing large block transactions without significantly moving the market price. REET, while still liquid enough for most retail investors, may present slightly higher transaction costs for very large orders. For long-term buy-and-hold investors, this liquidity difference is less critical than overall fee structures.

How do the dividend yields compare between REET and VNQ?

VNQ provides a slightly higher dividend yield of 3.71% compared to REET's 3.52%. This 0.19 percentage point difference offers marginally better income potential for cash flow-focused investors. Both funds distribute dividends, which are typically paid quarterly, reflecting the income generated by their underlying real estate holdings. However, yield alone does not determine total return; capital appreciation and market value changes are equally important. Investors seeking maximum current income might lean towards VNQ, while those prioritizing global diversification might accept the slightly lower yield of REET as a trade-off.

What does the sector weight data tell us?

Currently, detailed sector weight breakdowns are not available for either REET or VNQ according to the provided data. Consequently, investors cannot directly compare their specific sub-industry exposures, such as retail, healthcare, or industrial real estate allocations. Without this data, assessing concentration risks within specific real estate sub-sectors is challenging. However, the shared top holdings like WELL and PLD suggest both funds have significant exposure to healthcare, industrial, and digital infrastructure properties. Investors should remain aware of the lack of granular sector visibility, as this limits the ability to fine-tune portfolio balance between the two ETFs.

What is the overlap in their top holdings?

REET and VNQ share nine of their top ten holdings, including WELL, PLD, EQIX, DLR, SPG, O, PSA, VMRK, and VTR. This high degree of overlap indicates that both funds are heavily influenced by the same major US-based real estate companies. Despite REET's global mandate, its largest positions are primarily US firms, likely due to the dominance of US capital markets. The tenth holding differs, with VNQ including AMT while REET lists IRM. This similarity means their performance correlations may be higher than expected, though the remaining non-top-ten holdings could still diverge.

What is the significance of the index tracking methodology?

The specific index tracking methodology for both REET and VNQ is currently not available for review. This lack of transparency means investors cannot precisely determine the screening criteria, rebalancing frequency, or calculation methods used by the fund managers. Without this information, it is difficult to anticipate how each ETF will respond to index changes or market shifts. Investors should understand that these funds are passively managed, aiming to replicate their respective real estate benchmarks. However, the absence of detailed methodology data requires reliance on historical performance and current holdings as primary assessment tools.

How do the inception dates affect the track records?

VNQ has a significantly longer operating history, having been established on September 23, 2004, compared to REET's inception on July 8, 2014. This ten-year difference provides VNQ with a more extensive track record, offering greater visibility into its performance across various market cycles, including the 2008 financial crisis. REET, while mature, has been through fewer distinct economic phases. For investors valuing historical resilience and long-term consistency, VNQ's extended lifespan offers more data points for analysis, although past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which fund is better for a purely domestic portfolio?

VNQ is structurally aligned with a purely domestic portfolio, as it focuses exclusively on US real estate. Its category is listed as Real Estate, distinct from REET's Global Real Estate designation. Investors seeking to avoid currency risk or international geopolitical volatility associated with foreign assets would find VNQ more suitable for their constraints. While REET provides global diversification, it introduces variables such as exchange rate fluctuations and different regulatory environments. For a portfolio strictly adhering to US asset allocation targets, VNQ ensures no unintended international exposure, aligning precisely with a domestic-only investment mandate.

Are these ETFs considered financially advised?

This comparison is strictly educational and does not constitute financial advice. The data provided, including expense ratios, yields, and holdings, is sourced from Yahoo Finance and is current as of September 22, 2026. Investors should conduct their own due diligence or consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. Market conditions, fund structures, and financial data can change rapidly. The similarities and differences highlighted here are intended to aid understanding of ETF mechanics and real estate exposure, not to recommend purchasing or selling specific securities.

REET vs VNQ

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in October 2026.

REET vs VNQ compares the iShares Global REIT ETF and Vanguard Real Estate ETF by examining their fees, holdings, dividends and how each fund tracks its market. Both offer broad real estate exposure with similar top holdings, while differing slightly in expense ratios and dividend yields. Use this page to understand their structural and cost characteristics side by side. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

REET

Metric

VNQ

0.14%

Expense Ratio

0.13%

3.52%

Dividend Yield

3.71%

$4.73B

Net Assets

$36.87B

363

Holdings

151

Jul 8, 2014

Inception Date

Sep 23, 2004

–

Index Tracked

–

Global Real Estate

Fund Category

Real Estate

VNQ costs about $1.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	REET	VNQ
WELLWelltower Inc.	9.39%	8.72%
PLDPrologis, Inc.	7.26%	6.89%
EQIXEquinix, Inc.	5.72%	5.45%
DLRDigital Realty Trust, Inc.	3.84%	3.63%
SPGSimon Property Group, Inc.	3.73%	3.64%
ORealty Income Corporation	3.00%	3.00%
PSAPublic Storage	2.83%	2.72%
VMRKVivmark Residential	2.65%	2.46%
VTRVentas, Inc.	2.52%	2.34%

Discover More Comparisons

REET vs VNQI

Compare REET and VNQI global real estate ETFs on fees, holdings, and dividends. Review expense ratios of 0.14% and 0.12% and yield data for research.

REET vs SCHH

Compare REET and SCHH by fees, net assets, dividends and holdings. SCHH tracks US real estate at 0.07%, while REET covers global markets at 0.14%.

FREL vs VNQ

Compare FREL and VNQ real estate ETFs. Analyse 0.08% vs 0.13% fees, yields and top holdings. Both index not available. Neutral overview of key differences.

Investment Analysis

REET

Pros

The 0.14% expense ratio remains competitive for global coverage.
$4.7 billion net assets provide adequate liquidity and fund stability.
The 3.52% dividend yield supports income-focused strategies.

Considerations

Index tracking methodology is currently not available for review.
Sector weight breakdowns are not available for concentration assessment.
Top holdings show significant concentration in major REIT names.

VNQ

Pros

The 0.13% expense ratio is marginally lower than REET's fee.
$36.9 billion net assets ensure exceptionally high trading liquidity.
The 3.71% dividend yield offers slightly higher income potential.

Considerations

Index tracking approach remains unspecified and not available.
Sector weight distribution data is unavailable for analysis.
Portfolio holdings exhibit pronounced top-weight concentration risks.

Related Market Insights

Hard Assets for Hard Times: Why Tangible Investments Matter Now

Protect your purchasing power with Nemo's Hard Assets basket. Invest in companies owning tangible assets like precious metals & infrastructure to hedge against inflation.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

25 July 2025

Read Insight

Related Market Insights

Hard Assets for Hard Times: Why Tangible Investments Matter Now

Protect your purchasing power with Nemo's Hard Assets basket. Invest in companies owning tangible assets like precious metals & infrastructure to hedge against inflation.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

25 July 2025

Read Insight

About REET and VNQ

REET (REET)

iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) is an exchange-traded fund that provides investors with broad exposure to listed real estate investment trusts (REITs) and real-estate-related companies around the world. It offers a simple way to access property-sector income and capital appreciation through a single, liquid security, typically distributing dividends sourced from rent and property earnings. Investors should know the ETF’s performance reflects property market cycles, interest-rate sensitivity and regional economic trends; returns can be volatile and are not guaranteed. The fund carries market, currency and sector concentration risk — for example, rising interest rates or weaker leasing demand can pressure REIT valuations. REET may suit investors seeking diversified real-estate exposure without owning direct property, but it is not a substitute for professional advice. Consider your time horizon, risk tolerance and tax position before investing, and review the fund’s prospectus and ongoing charges for costs and specific index methodology.

VNQ (VNQ)

The Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) offers investors a convenient way to gain exposure to the US real estate market through Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). Launched in 2004, this fund tracks a broad index of publicly traded REITs, providing access to various property types, including residential, commercial, industrial, and healthcare sectors. With an expense ratio of 0.13%, it stands as a low-cost option for those looking to diversify their portfolios into real estate without directly purchasing physical properties. Holding 151 securities, VNQ delivers a dividend yield of approximately 3.71%, appealing to income-focused investors. As with any investment, values can rise and fall, and past performance does not guarantee future results. Investors should consider their individual financial circumstances before adding sector-specific ETFs to their portfolios.

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Inflation Hedge Basket

Looking to protect your money from rising prices? This collection features companies that own real, physical assets from gold mines to global infrastructure. Professional analysts have selected these stocks specifically for their ability to maintain and potentially increase in value during inflationary periods.

Published: 17 June 2025

Explore Basket

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Inflation Hedge Basket

Published: 17 June 2025

Explore Basket

Buy REET or VNQ in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

REET vs VNQ

Fund Snapshot