How do the expense ratios of FREL and VNQ compare structurally?

FREL has a 0.08% expense ratio while VNQ charges 0.13%, meaning FREL's annual fee is 0.05 percentage points lower. This structural difference impacts long-term net returns: for every $10,000 invested, FREL costs $8 annually versus VNQ's $13. However, fee differences alone shouldn't determine suitability; the 5-basis-point gap is relatively minor against typical real estate market volatility, and both remain low-cost options for sector exposure.

What role do index benchmarks play in comparing FREL and VNQ?

Both FREL and VNQ are designed to track real estate indices, though their specific underlying benchmarks are currently not available for public review. Without precise index methodology details, it's difficult to fully assess how closely either ETF replicates its target. Investors should note that tracking accuracy—how well the fund mirrors its benchmark—remains a critical performance factor beyond just expense ratios or holdings lists.

How do dividend yields and distribution mechanics differ between FREL and VNQ?

VNQ currently offers a 3.71% dividend yield compared to FREL's 3.45%, a 0.26-percentage-point advantage. This means $10,000 invested in VNQ generates approximately $371 in annual distributions versus $345 for FREL. Importantly, ETF distributions are not guaranteed fixed interest payments; they represent actual rental income, capital gains, or interest collected by the fund after fees, so yields fluctuate with REIT earnings and market conditions.

What do the top holdings of FREL and VNQ reveal about their portfolio concentration?

Both ETFs heavily overweight the same five REITs: Welltower (WELL), Prologis (PLD), Equinix (EQIX), American Tower (AMT), and Simon Property Group (SPG). FREL concentrates 37.91% in its top five versus VNQ's 35.03%, reflecting a modest 2.88-percentage-point difference. While both provide diversified US REIT exposure, FREL's slight concentration tilt means individual stock performance in WELL and PLD impacts its returns marginally more than VNQ's holdings.

How might the inception dates of FREL and VNQ affect historical performance evaluation?

VNQ has been trading since September 2004, while FREL launched on 2 February 2015, giving VNQ over a decade of additional performance history. This longer track record means VNQ has experienced more full market cycles—including periods of rising and falling interest rates—and offers investors more extensive historical data for evaluating performance patterns. FREL's shorter history limits the scope of backtesting or comparative analysis against long-term market conditions.

Which investor goals typically align with real estate ETFs like FREL and VNQ?

Investors seeking portfolio diversification into US commercial real estate without direct property ownership often consider ETFs like FREL and VNQ. These funds appeal to income-focused investors who prioritise stable rental yields and those looking for inflation-hedge characteristics. Goal alignment typically depends on risk tolerance regarding sector concentration, time horizon for capturing real estate cycles, and preference for liquidity versus potential illiquidity discounts in direct property investments.

How do the net asset values of FREL and VNQ affect liquidity for retail investors?

VNQ's $36.9 billion in net assets versus FREL's $1.5 billion indicates VNQ has approximately 24.6 times greater size, suggesting more active secondary-market trading and tighter bid-ask spreads. For most retail investors, this means VNQ likely offers easier entry and exit with less trading friction. However, FREL's size still supports sufficient liquidity for typical investor transactions, though institutional-scale trades might experience more price impact relative to VNQ's depth.

What sector exposure differences exist between FREL and VNQ's top ten holdings?

While both funds feature nine shared top-ten holdings (WELL, PLD, EQIX, AMT, SPG, DLR, O, PSA, VMRK), FREL's tenth holding is CBRE at 2.76% while VNQ's is Ventas (VTR) at 2.34%. This minor difference reflects each fund's unique benchmark weighting rather than strategic positioning. Both maintain heavy exposure to healthcare, industrial, and data centre REITs, with CBRE representing brokerage services versus VTR's senior housing focus.

Why do identical top holdings sometimes show different weightings across ETFs?

Identical top holdings can carry different percentage weights in ETFs like FREL and VNQ because each fund tracks a separate real estate benchmark index with distinct construction methodologies. For instance, WELL constitutes 9.54% of FREL versus 8.72% of VNQ, reflecting index-level differences in weighting schemes—some use market capitalisation, others employ equal-weighting, or factor-based approaches. This means tracking different indices creates natural, legitimate variances even when both ETFs target US REITs.

What should beginners prioritise when comparing FREL and VNQ in portfolio selection?

When comparing FREL and VNQ, beginners should prioritise expense ratio (FREL 0.08%, VNQ 0.13%), dividend yield (FREL 3.45%, VNQ 3.71%), and portfolio structure. While FREL offers a fee advantage, VNQ's 26 basis-point yield difference is 520% larger than FREL's fee savings ($0.26 versus $0.05 per $100), making yield a more impactful metric for income-focused investors. Assess whether lower costs or higher current income better suits your strategy.

Does this comparison constitute specific investment advice for FREL or VNQ?

No, this FAQ provides neutral, educational information to help understand how ETF comparisons work. It does not recommend buying, selling, or holding any specific investment. Individual investors' decisions should be based on personal financial goals, risk tolerance, tax considerations, and investment horizons, not solely on comparative fund data. Investors are encouraged to consult a qualified financial adviser before making any investment decision. The information above is not personalised advice.

FREL vs VNQ

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in October 2026.

Compare FREL and VNQ: fee structures, top holdings, dividend yields and tracking of real estate markets. FREL costs 0.08% with 3.45% yield. VNQ costs 0.13% with 3.71% yield. Both share key holdings like WELL and PLD. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

FREL

Metric

VNQ

0.08%

Expense Ratio

0.13%

3.45%

Dividend Yield

3.71%

$1.48B

Net Assets

$36.87B

128

Holdings

151

Feb 2, 2015

Inception Date

Sep 23, 2004

–

Index Tracked

–

Real Estate

Fund Category

Real Estate

FREL costs about $5.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	FREL	VNQ
WELLWelltower Inc.	9.54%	8.72%
PLDPrologis, Inc.	7.76%	6.89%
EQIXEquinix, Inc.	5.59%	5.45%
AMTAmerican Tower Corporation	4.68%	4.33%
SPGSimon Property Group, Inc.	4.34%	3.64%
DLRDigital Realty Trust, Inc.	4.09%	3.63%
ORealty Income Corporation	3.46%	3.00%
PSAPublic Storage	3.37%	2.72%
VMRKVivmark Residential	3.04%	2.46%

Discover More Comparisons

FREL vs SCHH

Compare FREL and SCHH on fees, holdings, dividends, and tracking. FREL has a 0.08% expense ratio; SCHH has 0.07%. See asset sizes and yields.

REET vs VNQ

Compare REET vs VNQ on fees, holdings, dividends, and tracking. Both track the global real estate market with top holdings and expense ratios.

SCHH vs VNQ

Compare SCHH and VNQ ETFs. Review 0.07% vs 0.13% fees, yields, holdings, and tracking details for these real estate funds to decide which to research.

Investment Analysis

FREL

Pros

Expense ratio of 0.08% is 5 basis points lower than VNQ, implying structurally lower holding costs.
Net assets of $1.5 billion are sufficient for institutional participation despite far smaller than VNQ’s $36.9 billion.
Top ten holdings include WELL at 9.54% and PLD at 7.76%, reflecting a conventional US REIT concentration.

Considerations

Dividend yield of 3.45% is 26 basis points lower than VNQ’s 3.71%, reducing current income relative to the peer.
Net assets of $1.5 billion mean liquidity and option-market depth are likely thinner than VNQ’s $36.9 billion scale.
Inception on Feb 2, 2015 provides less historical performance evidence than VNQ’s track record dating to Sep 23, 2004.

VNQ

Pros

Expense ratio of 0.13% remains low for US REIT exposure, offering a modest premium for Vanguard’s scale and liquidity.
Net assets of $36.9 billion support deeper bid-ask spreads, higher secondary-market turnover and broader investor access.
Dividend yield of 3.71% is 26 basis points higher than FREL, enhancing current income despite slightly greater concentration.

Considerations

Expense ratio of 0.13% is 5 basis points higher than FREL, creating a small ongoing drag over long holding periods.
Top ten holdings are slightly less concentrated than FREL but remain heavily weighted toward WELL at 8.72% and PLD at 6.89%.
Index tracked is not available, preventing precise comparison of benchmark methodology and sector weight differences versus FREL.

About FREL and VNQ

FREL (FREL)

The Fidelity Covington Trust MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL) is an exchange-traded fund designed to offer investors exposure to the real estate sector. With net assets of USD 1.48 billion, this fund provides a diversified approach by holding 128 different real estate assets. Investors might be drawn to its low expense ratio of 0.08%, which helps keep costs manageable over time. The fund, established on 2 February 2015, has a reported dividend yield of 3.45%, making it a potential option for those seeking regular income, although dividends are not guaranteed. It’s important to note that the value of real estate investments can fluctuate due to various market conditions and interest rates. While FREL offers a straightforward way to invest in real estate through the stock market, investors should be mindful of the inherent risks and consider their own financial situation before investing. Remember, all investments carry risk, and returns are not guaranteed.

VNQ (VNQ)

The Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) offers investors a convenient way to gain exposure to the US real estate market through Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs). Launched in 2004, this fund tracks a broad index of publicly traded REITs, providing access to various property types, including residential, commercial, industrial, and healthcare sectors. With an expense ratio of 0.13%, it stands as a low-cost option for those looking to diversify their portfolios into real estate without directly purchasing physical properties. Holding 151 securities, VNQ delivers a dividend yield of approximately 3.71%, appealing to income-focused investors. As with any investment, values can rise and fall, and past performance does not guarantee future results. Investors should consider their individual financial circumstances before adding sector-specific ETFs to their portfolios.

Buy FREL or VNQ in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

FREL vs VNQ

Fund Snapshot