What does the expense ratio represent for these ETFs?

The expense ratio is an annual fee charged to manage the fund, deducted from its assets. For IVOO (stock_1), the expense ratio is 0.07%, while for VO (stock_2), it is 0.03%. This difference of 0.04 percentage points means VO has a lower ongoing cost. Over time, even small fee differences can impact net returns, as lower costs allow more of the fund's gross performance to be retained by investors. Understanding this metric is crucial for evaluating long-term investment efficiency.

Why is net asset value important when comparing IVOO and VO?

Net assets indicate the total market value of the securities held by a fund. IVOO (stock_1) holds $3.9 billion in net assets, whereas VO (stock_2) holds $108.0 billion. Larger net assets often contribute to better liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads, which can reduce trading costs for investors. While both funds offer mid-cap blend exposure, VO's significantly larger asset base may provide more stability for high-volume trading, making liquidity a key factor in structural differences.

How do the inception dates of IVOO and VO affect performance analysis?

IVOO (stock_1) was launched on September 9, 2010, giving it a track record of over a decade. VO (stock_2) was launched on January 26, 2004, providing a longer history spanning multiple market cycles. A longer inception date allows for more robust historical performance data, which can be helpful for evaluating how a fund has behaved during various economic conditions. Both funds have sufficient history for basic long-term analysis, but VO offers a deeper dataset for comparative studies.

What are the top holdings in IVOO and how diversified is the fund?

IVOO's (stock_1) top holdings include Twilio at 1.00%, Illumina at 0.90%, and Frontier Communications at 0.87%. Notably, no single position exceeds 1.00%, indicating high diversification. This means the fund's performance is less dependent on any single company, potentially reducing specific stock risk. However, extreme diversification might dilute the impact of high-growth individual stocks. Investors should consider whether this broad exposure aligns with their desire for focused versus diffuse mid-cap market participation.

What are the top holdings in VO and how diversified is the fund?

VO's (stock_2) top holdings include Marathon Petroleum at 1.04%, Valero Energy at 1.02%, and Vertiv Holdings at 0.95%. Similar to IVOO, no position is significantly large, with the top holding slightly above 1%. This structure ensures that the fund remains highly diversified across its mid-cap blend strategy. While MPC and VLO are the largest positions, their low weights suggest minimal concentration risk. This broad exposure helps mitigate the impact of poor performance in any single company.

Do IVOO and VO share any common top-10 holdings?

Based on the provided data, there are no shared top-10 holdings between IVOO (stock_1) and VO (stock_2). IVOO's list includes companies like Twilio and Illumina, while VO's list features energy firms like Marathon Petroleum and Valero. This lack of overlap suggests that despite both being mid-cap blend ETFs from the same issuer, they currently hold distinct baskets of stocks. This difference can lead to varying performance outcomes and risk profiles for investors holding one versus the other.

How do the dividend yields of IVOO and VO compare?

IVOO (stock_1) offers a dividend yield of 1.21%, while VO (stock_2) provides a yield of 1.33%. Although both yields are relatively modest, VO's is slightly higher. Dividend yield is a key metric for income-focused investors, reflecting the annual income generated relative to the fund's share price. However, yields can fluctuate based on the underlying companies' payout decisions and the fund's net asset value. The difference of 0.12 percentage points may be relevant for those prioritizing current income over pure growth.

What can we learn about sector exposure from the available data?

Currently, specific sector weights are not available for either IVOO (stock_1) or VO (stock_2). This lack of transparency prevents a clear assessment of industrial or geographic concentration risks within the funds. Investors cannot definitively gauge whether one fund is heavier in technology, energy, or healthcare compared to the other. Without this data, understanding the structural differences in sector allocation relies solely on analysing the top holdings and their respective industries.

How do missing index tracking details affect investor evaluation?

For both IVOO (stock_1) and VO (stock_2), the specific index tracked is listed as 'not available'. This obscures the transparency regarding the benchmark construction methodology. Without knowing the exact index, investors cannot fully assess how the fund intends to replicate its target performance or what rules govern its stock selection. This limitation requires investors to rely on other metrics, such as expense ratios, net assets, and top holdings, to understand the fund's operational framework and potential tracking error.

What is the significance of the fund's liquidity for trading?

Liquidity is largely determined by net assets and trading volume. VO (stock_2) has $108.0 billion in net assets, compared to IVOO's (stock_1) $3.9 billion. Higher net assets generally indicate greater liquidity, leading to narrower bid-ask spreads and less price slippage during transactions. For retail investors executing smaller trades, both funds are likely accessible, but VO's larger size may offer slightly better trade execution efficiency for larger institutional orders or frequent trading strategies due to its extensive asset base.

IVOO vs VO

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare Vanguard Mid-Cap ETFs: IVOO vs VO. This page details expense ratios, dividend yields, and distinct top holdings for each fund. Understand how these mid-cap blend options track the market to help you evaluate their structural differences. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

IVOO

Metric

0.07%

Expense Ratio

0.03%

1.21%

Dividend Yield

1.33%

$3.86B

Net Assets

$107.97B

404

Holdings

288

Sep 9, 2010

Inception Date

Jan 26, 2004

–

Index Tracked

–

Mid-Cap Blend

Fund Category

Mid-Cap Blend

VO costs about $4.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

These funds do not share any of their top holdings.

Discover More Comparisons

IVOO vs VOO

Compare IVOO and VOO on fees, holdings, dividends and tracking. IVOO costs 0.07% with 1.21% yield; VOO costs 0.03% with 1.03% yield. Educational only.

IJH vs VO

Compare IJH and VO on fees, dividends and holdings. IJH costs 0.05 percent while VO costs 0.03 percent. Explore yield data and transparency.

Investment Analysis

IVOO

Pros

IVOO offers competitive low costs with a 0.07 percent expense ratio for mid-cap blend exposure.
The fund holds $3.9 billion in net assets, providing a stable base for institutional investors.
Inception in 2010 gives IVOO sufficient track record for evaluating long-term performance metrics.

Considerations

The index tracked is not available, obscuring transparency regarding specific benchmark construction methodology.
Sector weights are not available, preventing clear assessment of industrial or geographic concentration risks.
Top holdings are highly diversified with no position exceeding 1.00 percent, potentially diluting focused exposure.

VO

Pros

VO features an extremely low 0.03 percent expense ratio, maximising net returns for shareholders.
With $108.0 billion in net assets, VO offers excellent liquidity and low bid-ask spreads.
Inception in 2004 provides a lengthy track record for robust performance comparison over cycles.

Considerations

The index tracked is not available, limiting transparency regarding the specific benchmark used by VO.
Sector weights are not available, making it difficult to gauge concentration across industries or regions.
High portfolio diversification means top holdings like MPC and VLO are both below 1.1 percent.

About IVOO and VO

IVOO (IVOO)

The Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF provides investors with exposure to a broad range of mid-sized companies. Designed as a blend strategy, it balances growth and value characteristics, helping to diversify a portfolio beyond large-cap stocks. With a low expense ratio of 0.07%, this fund aims to keep costs minimal while tracking the performance of the US mid-cap market. It holds 404 companies, offering a snapshot of established firms with potential for continued expansion. Investors should note that while the fund has a history dating back to 2010, its value can rise and fall, and returns are not guaranteed. It is generally suitable for those seeking long-term exposure to the mid-cap sector with a focus on cost efficiency and diversification.

VO (VO)

The Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) offers investors broad exposure to the US mid-cap market through a low-cost, diversified approach. With net assets of approximately USD 107.97 billion and 288 holdings, this fund aims to track the performance of the mid-cap segment, balancing growth potential with stability. Investors appreciate its blend strategy, which combines value and growth characteristics within mid-sized companies. The fund features an expense ratio of 0.03%, making it an attractive option for cost-conscious investors. Its dividend yield stands at 1.33%, providing some income potential alongside capital growth opportunities. Inception date is January 26, 2004, reflecting a long-standing track record. Please note that values can rise and fall, and returns are not guaranteed. This fund may suit those seeking diversified mid-cap exposure but requires careful consideration of individual investment goals and risk tolerance.

Buy IVOO or VO in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

IVOO vs VO

Fund Snapshot

Discover More Comparisons

IVOO vs VOO

IJH vs VO

Investment Analysis

IVOO

Pros

Considerations

VO

Pros

Considerations

About IVOO and VO

Buy IVOO or VO in Nemo

Zero Commission

Trusted & Regulated

6% Interest on Cash

Frequently asked questions

What does the expense ratio represent for these ETFs?

Why is net asset value important when comparing IVOO and VO?

How do the inception dates of IVOO and VO affect performance analysis?

What are the top holdings in IVOO and how diversified is the fund?

What are the top holdings in VO and how diversified is the fund?

Do IVOO and VO share any common top-10 holdings?

How do the dividend yields of IVOO and VO compare?

What can we learn about sector exposure from the available data?

How do missing index tracking details affect investor evaluation?

What is the significance of the fund's liquidity for trading?

Fund Snapshot

About IVOO and VO

Discover More Comparisons

IVOO vs VOO

IJH vs VO