What is the difference between the expense ratios of DFAC and DFAU?

DFAC has an expense ratio of 0.17%, while DFAU has 0.12%. The difference of 0.05 percentage points means DFAU is more cost-efficient annually. Over time, even small differences can impact returns, though actual effects vary with market conditions. Investors often consider expense ratios when evaluating ETFs, as lower fees reduce the total cost of ownership.

What does the net asset value of an ETF mean?

Net asset value represents the total assets of a fund. DFAC has $48.8 billion in net assets compared to DFAU's $12.8 billion. Larger funds may offer better liquidity, but smaller funds might pursue niche strategies. While not directly affecting returns, fund size can influence trading ease and market stability, important factors for active traders or long-term investors seeking accessibility.

How do I interpret the dividend yield for an ETF like these?

Dividend yield shows the annual dividend paid relative to share price. DFAC yields 0.89% and DFAU 0.88%, indicating similar income levels. Dividends are typically paid quarterly or semi-annually. For ETFs, these payments come from underlying holdings’ dividends. While both funds offer comparable yields, the exact distribution depends on holdings and market performance, which may fluctuate.

Which ETF has more experience in the market?

DFAC, established on October 4, 2007, offers a longer track record compared to DFAU, launched on November 17, 2020. A longer track record means more historical data for assessing performance during various market conditions. However, past performance does not guarantee future results. Investors seeking stability through historical evidence may find DFAC’s longer history appealing, while DFAU focuses on newer market strategies.

How do these two funds compare in terms of sector weightings?

The sector weights for both DFAC and DFAU are not available. Without detailed sector breakdowns, investors cannot compare their industrial distribution or risk profiles directly. Both funds invest in US core equities with a large blend strategy, focusing on diversified holdings like NVDA and AAPL. This makes assessing their sector-specific exposures difficult without further information.

Which ETF provides more income to its investors?

Both DFAC and DFAU offer similar dividend yields, with DFAC at 0.89% and DFAU at 0.88%. These nearly identical figures indicate that the funds provide comparable income to investors. However, actual dividends vary with the underlying holdings' performance. Investors should consider overall fund performance and cost, as yields are just one factor when evaluating income potential.

What are the risks of the funds' concentration?

DFAU has higher concentrations in its top holdings, such as NVDA at 7.05% and AAPL at 6.94%, compared to DFAC's NVDA 5.60% and AAPL 5.54%. This suggests DFAU may be more exposed to fluctuations in these companies. High concentration increases sensitivity to these stocks' performance, potentially affecting returns more significantly if market conditions change.

How can I compare the two funds' top holdings?

Both funds share seven top holdings: NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN, META, MU, and AVGO. These common holdings suggest similar investment strategies focused on large-cap tech and communication services stocks. Differences arise in their inclusion of LLY (DFAC) and GOOG (DFAU), indicating variations in positioning despite overall overlap. This overlap aids in understanding their market exposure.

Which type of investor might prefer DFAC over DFAU?

Investors seeking stability through a longer track record may prefer DFAC, founded in 2007. Its larger asset base of $48.8 billion suggests liquidity advantages. Conversely, cost-conscious investors might favour DFAU's lower expense ratio. Each fund suits different priorities, with DFAC appealing for its history and DFAU for affordability, aligning with specific investor goals and preferences.

Is there a disclaimer about the information provided here?

This information is educational and not financial advice. Comparing DFAC and DFAU based on metrics like expense ratios and holdings helps inform decisions but does not constitute recommendations. Investors should conduct thorough research and consult a professional before making financial decisions, as markets can change rapidly.

DFAC vs DFAU

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF and Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF on fees, holdings, dividends and tracking. Review the 0.17% and 0.12% expense ratios and see how each fund invests. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

DFAC

Metric

DFAU

0.17%

Expense Ratio

0.12%

0.89%

Dividend Yield

0.88%

$48.75B

Net Assets

$12.78B

2,535

Holdings

2,225

Oct 4, 2007

Inception Date

Nov 17, 2020

–

Index Tracked

–

Large Blend

Fund Category

Large Blend

DFAU costs about $5.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	DFAC	DFAU
NVDANVIDIA Corporation	5.60%	7.05%
AAPLApple Inc.	5.54%	6.94%
MSFTMicrosoft Corporation	4.68%	5.35%
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.	2.91%	3.28%
METAMeta Platforms, Inc.	2.10%	1.98%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc.	1.62%	2.64%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.	1.29%	1.62%
AVGOBroadcom Inc.	1.27%	2.09%
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.	1.07%	1.25%

Discover More Comparisons

DFAC vs DFUS

Compare DFAC and DFUS ETFs. Review fees, holdings, dividends, and tracking. DFAC has 0.17% expense ratio; DFUS costs 0.09%. Neutral financial data analysis.

DCOR vs DFAU

Compare DCOR and DFAU on fees, holdings and dividends. Review expense ratios of 0.14% and 0.12%, yields, and tracking details for these large blend funds.

Investment Analysis

DFAC

Pros

It offers a significantly larger asset base of $48.8 billion compared to the other fund.
It benefits from an inception date in October 2007, providing a longer track record.
Its top holdings include a broader selection, such as Eli Lilly, offering distinct positioning.

Considerations

Its expense ratio is higher at 0.17 per cent, increasing the cost of ownership.
The dividend yield is marginally lower than the alternative fund, providing slightly less income.
Sector weights are not available, creating uncertainty about its specific industrial distribution.

DFAU

Pros

It has a lower expense ratio of 0.12 per cent, making it a more cost-efficient option.
It carries a higher concentration in top holdings like NVDA and AAPL, indicating a tilt.
It maintains a similar dividend yield to the alternative, offering comparable income generation.

Considerations

With $12.8 billion in net assets, it is smaller and potentially less liquid than the rival.
Its inception date of November 2020 results in a shorter historical track record.
Sector weights are not available, preventing a clear assessment of its industry-level risk.

About DFAC and DFAU

DFAC (DFAC)

The Dimensional US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) is an exchange-traded fund designed to provide broad exposure to the US large-cap stock market. Launched in October 2007, it has grown significantly to hold net assets of approximately USD 48.75 billion. The fund follows a core equity strategy, focusing on large blend companies across the spectrum of value and growth. With 2,535 holdings, it offers diversification within the US equity landscape. Its expense ratio stands at 0.17%, which is generally considered low-cost for an actively managed ETF of its size, although passive trackers can sometimes offer lower fees. The fund provides an estimated dividend yield of 0.89%. As with any equity investment, the value of shares can go down as well as up, and investors may not get back the amount they originally invested. It aims to balance risk and return through its diversified portfolio structure.

DFAU (DFAU)

The Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) offers investors access to a broad slice of the United States' largest publicly listed companies. With a net asset value of approximately USD 12.78 billion, it provides a diversified portfolio of around 2,225 holdings, primarily focusing on the Large Blend category. The fund employs a systematic investment approach, aiming to capture returns associated with various equity factors over the long term. Its expense ratio is competitively low at 0.12%, making it an accessible option for those looking to build a core portfolio component. Investors should note that the current dividend yield stands at 0.88%. As an exchange-traded fund, its value fluctuates with market conditions, and past performance is not indicative of future results. It was launched in November 2020.

Buy DFAC or DFAU in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

DFAC vs DFAU

Fund Snapshot

Discover More Comparisons

DFAC vs DFUS

DCOR vs DFAU

Investment Analysis

DFAC

Pros

Considerations

DFAU

Pros

Considerations

About DFAC and DFAU

Buy DFAC or DFAU in Nemo

Zero Commission

Trusted & Regulated

6% Interest on Cash

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between the expense ratios of DFAC and DFAU?

What does the net asset value of an ETF mean?

How do I interpret the dividend yield for an ETF like these?

Which ETF has more experience in the market?

How do these two funds compare in terms of sector weightings?

Which ETF provides more income to its investors?

What are the risks of the funds' concentration?

How can I compare the two funds' top holdings?

Which type of investor might prefer DFAC over DFAU?

Is there a disclaimer about the information provided here?

Fund Snapshot

About DFAC and DFAU

Discover More Comparisons

DFAC vs DFUS

DCOR vs DFAU