What does the expense ratio tell us about DCOR and DFAU costs?

The expense ratio is the annual fee deducted from the fund's assets. DCOR charges 0.14% and DFAU charges 0.12%. While both are low-cost, the 0.02 percentage point difference means DFAU is marginally cheaper to hold annually. Over long periods, lower fees can improve net returns by reducing cost drag, assuming all other factors remain equal. This difference is small but significant for cost-conscious investors evaluating these Dimensional-style strategies. It is a primary factor in comparing otherwise similar funds. Remember, expenses are automatically handled within the fund, not billed directly to your brokerage account.

How do inception dates affect comparing DCOR and DFAU track records?

DCOR launched on September 12, 2023, whereas DFAU started on November 17, 2020. This means DFAU has nearly three additional years of historical performance data available for analysis. A longer track record allows investors to observe how the fund handled different market conditions, such as varying interest rates and volatility. DCOR, being newer, reflects more current market dynamics but lacks this historical depth. When comparing ETFs, considering the inception date helps set expectations about the reliability of past performance as an indicator for the future. DFAU offers more data points for evaluation.

Why is net asset size important when comparing these two ETFs?

Net assets influence liquidity and potentially the bid-ask spread. DFAU holds $12.8 billion, significantly larger than DCOR's $3.5 billion. Generally, larger funds like DFAU may offer tighter trading spreads and easier entry/exit for substantial transactions due to higher trading volumes. DCOR's smaller size doesn't necessarily hinder average investors but might present lower liquidity for very large trades. Asset size does not directly determine performance, but it affects how easily and cost-effectively you can trade the ETF. Checking average daily volume is a good practical step alongside reviewing net assets.

Do DCOR and DFAU track a specific benchmark index?

According to the provided data, neither DCOR nor DFAU tracks a specific named benchmark index; both are listed as 'not available' in this regard. Dimensional funds often employ quantitative models rather than replicating a traditional index like the S&P 500. This means holdings are selected based on systematic criteria rather than mimicking an index's composition. For investors, this implies that performance should be judged against the fund's stated objectives and peer group rather than a standard index. Understanding that they are actively managed or model-driven strategies is key to evaluating their market positioning and expected behaviour.

How similar are the top holdings between DCOR and DFAU?

The two funds share an identical top-10 holdings list: Apple, Nvidia, Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, Alphabet (both listings), Broadcom, JPMorgan Chase, and Micron Technology. However, the weighting differs slightly. For instance, Nvidia is the top holding in DFAU at 7.05%, compared to 5.85% in DCOR. Similarly, Microsoft is 5.35% in DFAU versus 4.49% in DCOR. While the core composition is highly overlapping, these marginal differences in concentration reflect distinct portfolio construction nuances. The shared stocks indicate both funds have significant exposure to large-cap US technology and financial sectors, despite the model-driven approaches.

Which ETF offers a higher dividend yield currently?

DCOR currently offers a dividend yield of 0.91%, slightly higher than DFAU's 0.88%. Both funds distribute dividends, which is common for equity ETFs holding income-generating companies. The 0.03 percentage point difference is minor. It is important to remember that dividend yields fluctuate based on share price and corporate distributions, so this snapshot from September 2026 may change. High yield does not always equate to higher total returns. Investors should consider tax implications of distributions and whether the yield aligns with their income needs versus growth objectives, rather than focusing solely on this small differential.

How do concentration levels in top holdings compare between the two?

Both funds exhibit significant concentration in their top holdings. In DCOR, Apple (6.16%) and Nvidia (5.85%) are the largest positions. In DFAU, the top two are Nvidia (7.05%) and Apple (6.94%). This means DFAU has a slightly higher concentration in these two tech giants combined. High concentration implies that performance may be heavily driven by these few stocks. If these companies face market downturns, both funds are exposed, but potentially to varying degrees depending on their specific weights. Understanding this top-heavy nature is crucial for assessing sector risk and individual stock volatility within these Large Blend ETFs.

What does 'Large Blend' category mean for these funds?

Both DCOR and DFAU are classified as 'Large Blend' ETFs. This categorisation indicates they invest in large-capitalisation US companies that exhibit a mix of growth and value characteristics. They are not purely 'Growth' or 'Value' funds. This approach aims to capture the broader large-cap market experience rather than betting on a specific style factor. For investors, a Large Blend fund typically serves as a core holding for US equity exposure. It suggests a diversified approach to the biggest US firms, balancing stability from value stocks with potential upside from growth stocks, as seen in their mixed holdings like JPMorgan and Nvidia.

Can I determine sector allocation from the provided data?

No, specific sector weights are listed as 'not available' for both DCOR and DFAU in the provided dataset. While the top holdings reveal significant exposure to Technology (Apple, Nvidia, Microsoft, etc.) and Financials (JPMorgan), a precise breakdown of sector allocation across the entire portfolio is missing. Investors typically use sector weights to manage diversification and avoid unintended overexposure to a single industry. Without this data, you must infer broad sector trends from individual stock holdings or consult official fund documentation for a complete asset allocation picture. Relying solely on top holdings provides an incomplete view of overall sector risk.

How does the issuer information differ between DCOR and DFAU?

DCOR is managed by Dimensional, consistent with its fund name. Interestingly, the data lists ARK as the issuer for DFAU, despite the fund being named 'Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF'. This discrepancy in issuer details (Dimensional vs ARK for a Dimensional-branded fund) is unusual and requires verification through official prospectus documents. Issuer identity affects fees, governance, and brand reputation. While the strategy is Dimensional, the legal structure or listing entity might differ. Investors should always confirm the fund provider and manager directly from official sources, as this specific data point highlights the importance of checking regulatory filings rather than relying solely on fund names.

DCOR vs DFAU

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare fees, holdings, dividends and market tracking for Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF (DCOR) and Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU). Note that issuer details vary: DCOR is managed by Dimensional, while DFAU lists ARK as issuer. Both are Large Blend funds with not available sector weights. This page helps you understand how each fund tracks its market and their respective costs, such as the 0.14% and 0.12% expense ratios. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

DCOR

Metric

DFAU

0.14%

Expense Ratio

0.12%

0.91%

Dividend Yield

0.88%

$3.53B

Net Assets

$12.78B

2,409

Holdings

2,225

Sep 12, 2023

Inception Date

Nov 17, 2020

–

Index Tracked

–

Large Blend

Fund Category

Large Blend

DFAU costs about $2.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	DCOR	DFAU
AAPLApple Inc.	6.16%	6.94%
NVDANVIDIA Corporation	5.85%	7.05%
MSFTMicrosoft Corporation	4.49%	5.35%
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.	2.96%	3.28%
METAMeta Platforms, Inc.	2.23%	1.98%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc.	1.74%	2.64%
AVGOBroadcom Inc.	1.62%	2.09%
GOOGAlphabet Inc.	1.59%	2.17%
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.	1.37%	1.25%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.	1.23%	1.62%

Discover More Comparisons

DCOR vs DFAC

Compare DCOR and DFAC ETFs on expense ratios, top holdings, dividends and inception dates to assess differences in fees, assets and performance factors.

DFAC vs DFAU

Compare DFAC and DFAU on fees, holdings and dividends. DFAC charges 0.17% while DFAU is 0.12%. Review asset sizes and top weights to assess tracking.

Investment Analysis

DCOR

Pros

Its 0.14% expense ratio remains competitive for a large blend fund from Dimensional.
Recent 2023 inception avoids legacy trading distortions while capturing current market dynamics.
A 0.91% dividend yield slightly exceeds its peer, offering modest cash generation.

Considerations

No specific index tracked means holdings rely on opaque quantitative models.
Top ten stocks include two separate Alphabet listings, reducing effective diversification.
Smaller 3.5 billion assets may present lower liquidity for large trades.

DFAU

Pros

Its 0.12% expense ratio is marginally lower, reducing long-term cost drag.
Large 12.8 billion assets under management support robust liquidity and narrow spreads.
The 2020 inception date provides several years of track record for evaluation.

Considerations

No disclosed benchmark index makes methodology transparent but lacks a clear comparison target.
Top holdings are heavily concentrated, with Nvidia and Apple combined over 13 percent.
A dividend yield of 0.88% is slightly lower than its Dimensional peer.

About DCOR and DFAU

DCOR (DCOR)

The Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF (DCOR) offers investors a broad and balanced approach to accessing the United States stock market. Launched in September 2023, this fund falls under the Large Blend category, capturing a wide array of large-capitalisation companies across various sectors. It holds a comprehensive portfolio of 2,409 individual stocks, aiming for significant market coverage and diversification. With a low expense ratio of 0.14%, it maintains a cost-efficient structure for long-term holding. The fund currently reports a dividend yield of 0.91%, providing a modest income component alongside potential capital growth. As a relatively new vehicle with net assets of USD 3.53 billion, it is designed for investors seeking a transparent and low-cost foundation for their US equity allocation, though standard market risks apply.

DFAU (DFAU)

The Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) offers investors access to a broad slice of the United States' largest publicly listed companies. With a net asset value of approximately USD 12.78 billion, it provides a diversified portfolio of around 2,225 holdings, primarily focusing on the Large Blend category. The fund employs a systematic investment approach, aiming to capture returns associated with various equity factors over the long term. Its expense ratio is competitively low at 0.12%, making it an accessible option for those looking to build a core portfolio component. Investors should note that the current dividend yield stands at 0.88%. As an exchange-traded fund, its value fluctuates with market conditions, and past performance is not indicative of future results. It was launched in November 2020.

Buy DCOR or DFAU in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

DCOR vs DFAU

Fund Snapshot

Discover More Comparisons

DCOR vs DFAC

DFAC vs DFAU

Investment Analysis

DCOR

Pros

Considerations

DFAU

Pros

Considerations

About DCOR and DFAU

Buy DCOR or DFAU in Nemo

Zero Commission

Trusted & Regulated

6% Interest on Cash

Frequently asked questions

What does the expense ratio tell us about DCOR and DFAU costs?

How do inception dates affect comparing DCOR and DFAU track records?

Why is net asset size important when comparing these two ETFs?

Do DCOR and DFAU track a specific benchmark index?

How similar are the top holdings between DCOR and DFAU?

Which ETF offers a higher dividend yield currently?

How do concentration levels in top holdings compare between the two?

What does 'Large Blend' category mean for these funds?

Can I determine sector allocation from the provided data?

How does the issuer information differ between DCOR and DFAU?

Fund Snapshot

About DCOR and DFAU

Discover More Comparisons

DCOR vs DFAC

DFAC vs DFAU