What do the expense ratios for ASHR and CNYA represent?

The expense ratio is the annual fee charged by the fund. For ASHR, the expense ratio is 0.65%, while for CNYA it is 0.60%. This difference of 0.05 percentage points means CNYA costs slightly less to hold annually. Understanding these fees is crucial as they directly reduce the net return delivered to investors over time. Always compare these ratios when evaluating similar investment products.

How do ASHR and CNYA differ in their index tracking?

ASHR tracks the CSI 300 A Shares index, focusing on large-cap companies in mainland China. In contrast, CNYA targets the MSCI China A index, which also represents mainland Chinese stocks but uses MSCI's specific methodology for selection. Although detailed methodology for ASHR is not available, the distinction lies in the benchmark providers and their unique criteria for defining the investable universe within China.

Are the top holdings of ASHR and CNYA similar?

When examining the listed top holdings for both funds, there are no shared positions among their respective top-10 holdings. This lack of overlap suggests that despite both targeting China A-shares, their underlying portfolios diverge significantly. This can result from different index construction methods or specific security weighting. Investors should note that top holdings data for both funds is not fully available in this dataset.

Which ETF has higher net assets, ASHR or CNYA?

ASHR has net assets of $1.5 billion, whereas CNYA has net assets of $209 million. Generally, larger net assets can support greater liquidity and potentially tighter bid-ask spreads, which are the differences between the highest price a buyer bids and the lowest price a seller asks. Smaller funds may experience wider spreads, impacting trading costs for active investors.

How do the dividend yields compare between ASHR and CNYA?

ASHR provides a dividend yield of 2.22%, while CNYA offers a yield of 1.82%. A higher yield indicates more income generated relative to the share price, though it does not guarantee future payments. These yields reflect the underlying companies' distribution policies. Investors seeking income might consider this difference, but yields can fluctuate based on market prices and company decisions.

What is the historical track record of each fund?

ASHR has an inception date of November 6, 2013, providing a longer historical track record for analysis. CNYA was launched on June 13, 2016. A longer history allows investors to observe performance across more market cycles. However, past performance is not indicative of future results, and the shorter history of CNYA still covers several years of market activity.

Who are the issuers behind ASHR and CNYA?

The issuer for ASHR is not available in the provided data. CNYA is issued by iShares, a well-known provider of ETFs with established global management capabilities. Knowing the issuer can help assess operational robustness and transparency. While ASHR's lack of issuer details limits direct comparison of management quality, investors should look for available disclosures to gauge trustworthiness.

What region do both ETFs focus on?

Both ASHR and CNYA are categorized under the Greater China Region. They provide exposure to the Chinese equity market, specifically focusing on A-shares traded on mainland exchanges. This category indicates they are subject to similar macroeconomic factors, regulatory changes, and market risks inherent to the Chinese economy. Geographic focus is a primary differentiator from global or emerging market funds.

Why might the exposure differ despite similar regions?

Even though both target the Greater China Region, ASHR focuses on the CSI 300 while CNYA tracks MSCI China A. Different index providers have varying rules for inclusion, weighting, and sector representation. This leads to distinct portfolios, explaining why there are no shared top holdings. Market dynamics and index methodologies cause these ETFs to perform differently over time.

What data is missing for detailed due diligence?

For both ASHR and CNYA, specific details such as sector weights and full top holdings lists are not available. Additionally, ASHR lacks issuer and tracked index details. This absence obscures specific methodology and transparency. Investors must rely on the available data like expense ratios and yields, understanding that a complete picture of risk and return is not fully accessible from this summary.

How should a beginner interpret these comparisons?

Beginners should view these metrics as starting points. Compare costs (0.65% vs 0.60%), size ($1.5B vs $209M), and income (2.22% vs 1.82%). Recognise that lack of shared holdings implies different portfolios. Use this to identify which factors matter most to you, such as low cost or high liquidity. Remember, this is educational content, not financial advice, and personal circumstances vary.

ASHR vs CNYA

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in October 2026.

Compare ASHR and CNYA by examining fees, dividends, holdings and market tracking. ASHR tracks the CSI 300 A Shares with a 0.65% expense ratio and 2.22% yield, while CNYA targets the MSCI China A index at a 0.60% expense ratio with a 1.82% yield. Note that top holdings and sector weights are not available. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

ASHR

Metric

CNYA

0.65%

Expense Ratio

0.60%

2.22%

Dividend Yield

1.82%

$1.49B

Net Assets

$208.93M

288

Holdings

422

Nov 6, 2013

Inception Date

Jun 13, 2016

–

Index Tracked

–

Greater China Region

Fund Category

Greater China Region

CNYA costs about $5.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

These funds do not share any of their top holdings.

Discover More Comparisons

ASHR vs FXI

Compare ASHR and FXI ETFs. Analyse 0.65% vs 0.74% fees, 2.22% vs 1.95% yields, and $1.5bn vs $4.1bn net assets for informed decision making.

Investment Analysis

ASHR

Pros

net assets of $1.5 billion support greater liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads than the alternative fund.
track record dates to November 2013, offering more historical performance data for analysis.
dividend yield of 2.22 percent provides slightly higher income potential than the competing ETF.

Considerations

expense ratio of 0.65 percent is marginally higher than the alternative fund’s 0.60 percent.
issuer details are not available, limiting transparency on the fund management provider.
index tracked information is not available, obscuring specific methodology details for due diligence.

CNYA

Pros

issuer is iShares, a well-known provider with established global ETF management capabilities.
expense ratio of 0.60 percent is slightly lower than the alternative fund’s 0.65 percent.
tracks MSCI China A index, providing recognised benchmark methodology despite missing specific details.

Considerations

net assets of $209 million may result in wider bid-ask spreads and lower liquidity.
inception date of June 2016 offers a shorter historical track record for analysis.
dividend yield of 1.82 percent is lower than the alternative fund’s 2.22 percent.

Related Market Insights

Go Global: Why Smart Money is Fleeing US Markets

Smart money is shifting from US to international markets. Discover why global ETFs offer better valuations & diversification. Invest in undervalued European & Asian stocks with Nemo's Go Global Neme.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

25 July 2025

Read Insight

Related Market Insights

Go Global: Why Smart Money is Fleeing US Markets

Smart money is shifting from US to international markets. Discover why global ETFs offer better valuations & diversification. Invest in undervalued European & Asian stocks with Nemo's Go Global Neme.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

25 July 2025

Read Insight

About ASHR and CNYA

ASHR (ASHR)

The Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 A Shares ETF is an exchange-traded fund designed to provide investors with exposure to large-capitalisation Chinese stocks. Launched in November 2013, this fund holds approximately 288 investments and has net assets of USD 1.49 billion. It operates with an expense ratio of 0.65% and currently offers a dividend yield of 2.22%. As a Greater China Region category fund, it tracks the performance of a broad index representing the Chinese equity market. While this provides access to a significant economy, potential investors should remember that values can rise and fall, and past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. The fund does not distribute dividends directly as income but reflects them in its total return profile, offering a straightforward way to participate in Chinese market movements within a diversified structure. Always consider your personal circumstances and seek independent advice before investing.

CNYA (CNYA)

iShares MSCI China A ETF (CNYA) is an exchange‑traded fund that offers investors a convenient way to gain exposure to mainland China A‑share companies through a single traded security. The fund seeks to replicate the performance of an index representing large‑ and mid‑cap Chinese mainland equities across multiple sectors, providing diversified access to domestic Chinese growth themes. Investors should review the fund’s factsheet and prospectus for details on the exact index, fees, tracking error and index methodology. Key considerations include higher volatility compared with developed markets, regulatory and geopolitical risk, currency fluctuations and potential liquidity constraints in local markets. As with all ETFs, there are trade‑related costs such as bid‑ask spreads and the possibility of tracking deviation. This content is general educational information only and not personalised financial advice; the value of investments can fall as well as rise and returns are not guaranteed. Consider suitability and, if needed, consult a regulated financial adviser.

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Go Global

As investors seek alternatives to US assets, these international markets are gaining attention. Our analysts have carefully selected these ETFs to help you capitalize on global opportunities and diversify beyond US borders.

Published: 8 May 2025

Explore Basket

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Go Global

Published: 8 May 2025

Explore Basket

Buy ASHR or CNYA in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

ASHR vs CNYA

Fund Snapshot

Discover More Comparisons

ASHR vs FXI

Investment Analysis

ASHR

Pros

Considerations

CNYA

Pros

Considerations

Related Market Insights

Go Global: Why Smart Money is Fleeing US Markets

Related Market Insights

Go Global: Why Smart Money is Fleeing US Markets

About ASHR and CNYA

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Go Global

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Go Global

Buy ASHR or CNYA in Nemo

Zero Commission

Trusted & Regulated

6% Interest on Cash

Frequently asked questions

What do the expense ratios for ASHR and CNYA represent?

How do ASHR and CNYA differ in their index tracking?

Are the top holdings of ASHR and CNYA similar?

Which ETF has higher net assets, ASHR or CNYA?

How do the dividend yields compare between ASHR and CNYA?

What is the historical track record of each fund?

Who are the issuers behind ASHR and CNYA?

What region do both ETFs focus on?

Why might the exposure differ despite similar regions?

What data is missing for detailed due diligence?

How should a beginner interpret these comparisons?

Fund Snapshot

Related Market Insights

Go Global: Why Smart Money is Fleeing US Markets

Related Market Insights

Go Global: Why Smart Money is Fleeing US Markets

About ASHR and CNYA

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Go Global

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Go Global

Discover More Comparisons

ASHR vs FXI