What is an expense ratio and how does it affect my investment?

An expense ratio represents the annual cost of managing a fund, expressed as a percentage of the investment. For AIQ, the expense ratio is 0.68%, while ARTY charges 0.47%. Over time, this 0.21 percentage point difference can impact net returns, as higher fees reduce the overall profit margin. However, expenses are just one factor; investors should also consider tracking accuracy and liquidity. Understanding these costs helps in evaluating the efficiency of each ETF relative to its performance goals.

Why is the benchmark index methodology listed as not available?

Both AIQ and ARTY are technology ETFs that track specific indices, yet the source data states 'index tracked: not available' for both. This absence of public methodology can make it challenging to assess how strictly passive or active the construction is. Investors relying on transparent benchmark definitions may find this limitation noteworthy, as it affects how one evaluates the fund's alignment with broader market movements versus thematic selection strategies.

What does net asset value indicate about an ETF's size?

Net assets reflect the total market value of securities held by the fund, indicating its size and liquidity potential. AIQ holds $10.5 billion in net assets, whereas ARTY holds $4.1 billion. Larger funds like AIQ often benefit from tighter bid-ask spreads and easier trading due to higher liquidity. While ARTY is smaller, it remains substantial. Understanding these differences helps investors gauge how easily they might enter or exit positions without significant price impact.

How do the top holdings of AIQ and ARTY differ in concentration?

AIQ features a diversified top-ten list with its highest weight at 3.94% (PLTR). In contrast, ARTY has more concentrated exposure, with its top holding AMD at 5.29%. This structural difference implies that ARTY may carry slightly higher single-stock risk due to larger allocations in specific semiconductor names. AIQ's broader distribution across mega-cap tech names suggests a more balanced approach to individual company exposure within its top tier.

Which shared holdings appear in both ETFs' top ten lists?

AIQ and ARTY share three common top-ten holdings: SPCX, ORCL, and AMD. This overlap indicates that both funds recognise these companies as significant players in the artificial intelligence and technology sectors. However, the weighting differs; for instance, AMD is 3.03% in AIQ but 5.29% in ARTY. Recognising these shared assets helps investors understand where the strategies converge despite different overall portfolio constructions.

How do the issuers' backgrounds influence trust in these funds?

AIQ is managed by Global X, known for thematic ETFs, while ARTY is an iShares product by BlackRock, a global leader in asset management. ARTY benefits from BlackRock's extensive infrastructure and issuer reputation, which may instill confidence in operational robustness. Global X offers specialised thematic expertise with significant scale. Both issuers provide established platforms, but investors might weigh the global reach of iShares against the targeted focus of Global X.

What role do semiconductor weights play in distinguishing the funds?

ARTY delivers concentrated exposure to semiconductor and infrastructure beneficiaries, with top holdings like NVDA and AVGO reflecting this focus. AIQ includes semiconductor names such as INTC and AMD but maintains a broader mega-cap technology mix, including cloud and software firms. This distinction means ARTY may react more sharply to semiconductor cycle developments, while AIQ's performance might reflect a wider technology sector trend. Investors should note this thematic tilt in ARTY.

How do inception dates compare and what does that mean?

AIQ was launched on May 11, 2018, while ARTY began on June 26, 2018. Both funds have existed for several years, providing a similar historical window for performance assessment. The near-identical inception dates suggest they were developed during a similar period of growing interest in artificial intelligence investments. Consequently, both have comparable track records length-wise, allowing for relatively fair direct comparisons in their early years of market presence.

Why is the dividend yield so low for these technology ETFs?

AIQ offers a dividend yield of 0.07%, and ARTY provides 0.06%. These minimal yields highlight that both funds are structured as growth vehicles rather than income sources. Technology sector companies often reinvest profits into research and expansion rather than distributing dividends. Therefore, investors seeking regular income should not rely on these ETFs. The low yields reflect the sector's nature, where capital appreciation is the primary return driver rather than cash distribution.

How does trading liquidity differ between a $10.5 billion and a $4.1 billion fund?

AIQ, with $10.5 billion in net assets, typically supports more efficient market-making and potentially tighter bid-ask spreads compared to ARTY, which holds $4.1 billion. While ARTY remains a sizable fund, its smaller asset base might imply slightly lower trading liquidity during volatile periods. Investors should consider this if they require frequent trading or large position adjustments, as larger funds often provide smoother execution due to higher volume availability.

What should investors understand before comparing these specific ETFs?

Comparing AIQ and ARTY requires examining fee structures, concentration levels, and thematic tilts. AIQ offers scale and diversification with a higher expense ratio, while ARTY provides lower costs with concentrated semiconductor exposure. Neither fund is suitable for income generation due to negligible yields. Understanding these trade-offs helps align fund characteristics with investment goals. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.

AIQ vs ARTY

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in October 2026.

Compare Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) and iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (ARTY). This page examines their expenses ratios, top holdings, dividend yields, and market tracking approaches to help you understand the differences between these two technology sector funds. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

AIQ

Metric

ARTY

0.68%

Expense Ratio

0.47%

0.07%

Dividend Yield

0.06%

$10.46B

Net Assets

$4.06B

Holdings

May 11, 2018

Inception Date

Jun 26, 2018

–

Index Tracked

–

Technology

Fund Category

Technology

ARTY costs about $21.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	AIQ	ARTY
SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies Corp.	3.41%	2.67%
ORCLOracle Corporation	3.29%	4.18%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc.	3.03%	5.29%

Discover More Comparisons

AIQ vs AIS

Compare AIQ and AIS ETFs. Review 0.68% vs 0.75% fees, $10.5bn vs $1.0bn assets, dividend yields and top holdings. Track record and index details unavailable.

AIQ vs CHAT

Compare AIQ and CHAT fees, holdings, dividends, and tracking. AIQ: 0.68% fee, $10.5bn assets, 0.07% yield. CHAT: 0.75% fee, $1.8bn assets, 1.80% yield.

AIQ vs BOTZ

Compare AIQ and BOTZ, both from Global X with a 0.68% expense ratio. AIQ ($10.5bn) includes PLTR; BOTZ ($3.3bn) holds ISRG. Review yields and holdings.

Investment Analysis

AIQ

Pros

AIQ offers substantial scale with $10.5 billion in net assets, supporting liquidity and potential for tighter bid-ask spreads.
It features a highly diversified top-ten list of mega-cap technology names, with the highest holding weight at 3.94%.
Despite its higher expense ratio, its large size may support efficient market-making and competitive trading execution.

Considerations

The 0.68% expense ratio is significantly higher than the cheaper alternative, adding a continuous drag on net returns.
Its extremely low dividend yield of 0.07% makes it unsuitable for investors seeking meaningful income generation.
The fund’s benchmark index methodology is not available, limiting transparency for those assessing its active or passive construction.

ARTY

Pros

ARTY provides a lower-cost option with a 0.47% expense ratio, reducing the fee burden on investors’ returns.
It delivers concentrated exposure to semiconductor and infrastructure beneficiaries, with top holdings heavily weighted toward chipmakers.
As an iShares product, it benefits from BlackRock’s strong issuer reputation and established global infrastructure.

Considerations

The fund is materially smaller at $4.1 billion in net assets, which might imply slightly lower trading liquidity.
It has a very low dividend yield of 0.06%, reinforcing its role as a growth vehicle rather than an income source.
Its top-ten holdings are more concentrated, with the largest position at 5.29%, introducing greater single-stock risk.

About AIQ and ARTY

AIQ (AIQ)

The Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF offers investors exposure to companies developing and applying artificial intelligence technology. With a focus on firms that utilise AI for goods and services, the fund tracks the performance of the AI and Tech index, reflecting the broader digital economy. This exchange-traded fund has a technology sector weighting and a moderate expense ratio of 0.68%. While it provides a diversified approach to the growing AI market with approximately 96 holdings, it typically does not pay dividends, though it maintains a small yield of 0.07%. Investors should be mindful that technology sector values can be volatile, and returns are not guaranteed.

ARTY (ARTY)

The iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (ARTY) offers investors targeted exposure to companies globally positioned to benefit from the artificial intelligence revolution. Launched in mid-2018, this fund focuses on businesses involved in the development, deployment, and commercialisation of AI technologies across various sectors. With a modest expense ratio of 0.47% and net assets of approximately USD 4.06 billion, ARTY provides a diversified approach, holding around 74 stocks rather than concentrating solely on major tech giants. This strategy aims to capture growth opportunities within the broader tech and AI ecosystem, including software, hardware, and services. However, investors should remain aware that while the AI sector shows significant long-term potential, it can also be subject to high volatility and regulatory changes. As a general investment tool, ARTY is best suited for those seeking to include future-focused technology in their portfolios, acknowledging that capital is at risk and returns are not guaranteed.

Buy AIQ or ARTY in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

AIQ vs ARTY

Fund Snapshot