What is the expense ratio and how does it affect my investment?

The expense ratio represents the annual operating fee charged by the fund, deducted from assets rather than billed directly. In this comparison, AIQ has an expense ratio of 0.68%, while CHAT charges 0.75%. This means AIQ is 0.07 percentage points cheaper to hold. Over time, lower fees can help preserve net returns, as higher costs reduce the compounding effect. Investors should compare these costs alongside performance figures, noting that fees are fixed percentages and will apply regardless of whether the fund rises or falls in value.

What does net assets tell me about an ETF?

Net assets, often referred to as assets under management, indicate the total market value of all holdings within the fund. Higher net assets, like those of AIQ at $10.5 billion, generally suggest greater liquidity and stability, potentially leading to tighter bid-ask spreads. In contrast, CHAT holds $1.8 billion in net assets. While not directly guaranteeing performance, larger funds may offer easier trading conditions. Smaller funds might experience more volatility in trading volumes, but both figures reflect the current size of the respective ETFs as of the data snapshot.

Why does the index tracked matter for ETFs?

Most ETFs track a specific benchmark index to replicate its performance. However, for both AIQ and CHAT, the index tracked is listed as not available. This indicates that these funds may be actively managed or follow a proprietary methodology rather than strictly adhering to a public index like the S&P 500. Investors should verify the fund's prospectus for details on its investment strategy. Without a standard index, tracking error—the divergence between the fund and its benchmark—cannot be measured in the traditional sense for these specific products.

How do the dividend yields of AIQ and CHAT compare?

Dividend yield is the annual payout relative to the share price. AIQ offers a yield of 0.07%, which is exceptionally low and suggests a strong focus on capital appreciation rather than income. CHAT offers a yield of 1.80%, which is notably higher and may provide some regular cash flow to investors. While CHAT generates more income from distributions, AIQ prioritises growth, potentially reinvesting profits into the underlying companies. Investors seeking income might prefer CHAT's yield, while growth-focused investors might look at AIQ's strategy, depending on their individual financial objectives.

What is the difference in inception dates and track record?

AIQ was launched in May 2018, giving it an inception date that allows for evaluating performance over a longer period, including multiple market cycles. CHAT was launched in May 2023, meaning it is a much newer fund with a limited track record. While CHAT offers recent exposure to the generative AI theme, the lack of long-term history means investors have less data on how it performs during various market conditions. AIQ's longer history may provide more context for assessing its risk and return characteristics over time compared to the shorter tenure of CHAT.

How do the top holdings of AIQ and CHAT overlap?

Both ETFs share four holdings in their top 10 lists: Microsoft (MSFT), Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), Alphabet (GOOGL), and Amazon (AMZN). However, their overall exposure differs. AIQ's top holding is Palantir (PLTR) at 3.94%, while CHAT's is NVIDIA (NVDA) at 6.92%. AIQ also includes SpaceX (SPCX), while CHAT holds ASML and MU. This indicates that while they both target technology and AI, CHAT appears more concentrated in semiconductor leadership, whereas AIQ has a broader mix including software and space technology, reflecting distinct strategic focuses.

How does sector weighting differ between AIQ and CHAT?

Detailed sector weighting data is currently not available for either AIQ or CHAT. Investors rely on top holdings to infer sector exposure. Both funds are categorised under Technology. AIQ's top holdings include significant weights in hardware (INTC, AMD) and software (ORCL, META). CHAT also focuses on semiconductors (NVDA, AMD, ASML) and internet platforms (GOOGL, AMZN). Without specific sector weight percentages, investors should review the funds' latest fact sheets to understand the precise breakdown of industrial, communication services, and consumer discretionary sectors within each portfolio, as these details can vary significantly between thematic ETFs.

What is the impact of active thematic management on fees?

AIQ and CHAT are thematic ETFs, which often carry higher expense ratios than broad market index funds. AIQ's 0.68% fee and CHAT's 0.75% fee are moderately competitive within the active thematic technology category but higher than passive equivalents. These fees cover the cost of selecting specific AI and technology companies. The higher fee structure reflects the potential for active management to capture growth in rapidly evolving sectors. However, investors must weigh this cost against the possibility of outperforming standard indices or being exposed to specific sub-sectors like generative AI, which broader funds might underweight.

Can I rely on AIQ or CHAT for immediate cash income?

If your primary goal is cash flow, CHAT with a 1.80% yield is more suitable for income generation than AIQ, which has a 0.07% yield. However, ETFs do not offer a fixed income promise; distributions vary based on holdings and market conditions. AIQ's minimal yield indicates it is primarily a growth vehicle, reinvesting dividends. Investors seeking consistent monthly income might need to look beyond these funds. Remember that tax treatment of dividends varies by jurisdiction, so consider consulting a tax professional when evaluating income strategies from these ETFs.

How should I interpret the lack of index tracking data?

When index tracked is not available, it suggests the fund is either actively managed or follows a custom strategy not linked to a public benchmark. For both AIQ and CHAT, this means their performance is not directly tied to a standard index's movements. Investors cannot use a single index to predict the fund's performance. Instead, one must analyse the specific holdings and the fund's stated objective. This requires more diligence than investing in index-tracking ETFs, as the manager's decisions heavily influence returns, risks, and sector allocation within the portfolio.

AIQ vs CHAT

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in October 2026.

This page compares the Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) and the Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) on fees, holdings, dividends, and how each tracks its market. AIQ charges 0.68% with $10.5bn assets and 0.07% yield; CHAT charges 0.75% with $1.8bn assets and 1.80% yield. Index tracked is not available for either. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

AIQ

Metric

CHAT

0.68%

Expense Ratio

0.75%

0.07%

Dividend Yield

1.80%

$10.46B

Net Assets

$1.84B

Holdings

May 11, 2018

Inception Date

May 17, 2023

–

Index Tracked

–

Technology

Fund Category

Technology

AIQ costs about $7.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	AIQ	CHAT
MSFTMicrosoft Corporation	3.49%	3.72%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc.	3.03%	3.14%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc.	2.97%	5.69%
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.	2.94%	3.42%

Discover More Comparisons

AIQ vs ARTY

Compare AIQ and ARTY on fees, holdings, dividends, and tracking. View expense ratios, net assets, yields, and top positions for this technology ETF comparison.

AIQ vs AIS

Compare AIQ and AIS ETFs. Review 0.68% vs 0.75% fees, $10.5bn vs $1.0bn assets, dividend yields and top holdings. Track record and index details unavailable.

AIQ vs BOTZ

Compare AIQ and BOTZ, both from Global X with a 0.68% expense ratio. AIQ ($10.5bn) includes PLTR; BOTZ ($3.3bn) holds ISRG. Review yields and holdings.

Investment Analysis

AIQ

Pros

Expense ratio of 0.68% is moderately competitive within the active thematic technology category.
Net assets of $10.5 billion provide significant scale, reducing risks associated with smaller fund closures or liquidity constraints.
Dividend yield of 0.07% reflects the fund's strong focus on growth-oriented artificial intelligence companies.

Considerations

Dividend yield of 0.07% is exceptionally low, offering minimal income to investors seeking cash flow.
Expense ratio of 0.68% is considerably higher than broad market index funds, increasing the cost of ownership.
Track record from May 2018 may be considered short for evaluating performance through multiple market cycles.

CHAT

Pros

Dividend yield of 1.80% is notably higher than many comparable thematic technology funds.
Net assets of $1.8 billion represent sufficient size for the fund to maintain reliable trading liquidity.
Inception date of May 2023 indicates a recent launch focused purely on the emerging generative AI theme.

Considerations

Expense ratio of 0.75% is higher than its major competitor, potentially impacting long-term net returns.
Net assets of $1.8 billion are significantly smaller than established peers, possibly indicating lower trading volumes.
Inception date of May 2023 means the fund lacks a long-term track record for performance assessment.

About AIQ and CHAT

AIQ (AIQ)

The Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF offers investors exposure to companies developing and applying artificial intelligence technology. With a focus on firms that utilise AI for goods and services, the fund tracks the performance of the AI and Tech index, reflecting the broader digital economy. This exchange-traded fund has a technology sector weighting and a moderate expense ratio of 0.68%. While it provides a diversified approach to the growing AI market with approximately 96 holdings, it typically does not pay dividends, though it maintains a small yield of 0.07%. Investors should be mindful that technology sector values can be volatile, and returns are not guaranteed.

CHAT (CHAT)

The Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (Ticker: CHAT) offers investors a focused pathway to engage with the rapidly evolving landscape of artificial intelligence and advanced technology. As an Exchange-Traded Fund, it tracks a basket of 45 holdings primarily composed of companies involved in generative AI, cloud computing, semiconductors, and data infrastructure. Launched in May 2023, the fund holds approximately USD 1.84 billion in net assets, reflecting significant market interest in this thematic sector. With an expense ratio of 0.75%, it sits at the higher end compared to broad-market indices, a cost that aligns with its specialised, actively managed nature and niche exposure. While the fund currently reports a dividend yield of 1.80%, investors should note that this is an educational overview and not personalised financial advice. The technology sector is historically known for high growth potential but also for substantial volatility. Values can rise and fall, and past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. It is crucial to consider your own risk tolerance and investment objectives before adding thematic ETFs like CHAT to your portfolio.

Buy AIQ or CHAT in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

AIQ vs CHAT

Fund Snapshot