SPUUSSO

SPUU vs SSO

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare SPUU and SSO for fees, holdings, dividends and how each tracks the market. SPUU charges 0.60% with $285m in assets, while SSO charges 0.87% with $8.8bn. Review yields, inception dates and top ...

Investment Analysis

SPUU

SPUU

SPUU

Pros

  • SPUU offers a lower expense ratio of 0.60 per cent compared to the 0.87 per cent charged by SSO.
  • It provides a higher dividend yield of 1.26 per cent relative to the 0.63 per cent yield of SSO.
  • Launched on 28 May 2014, SPUU is a more recent fund that may reflect updated operational structures.

Considerations

  • The net assets of SPUU are significantly smaller at $285 million versus $8.8 billion for SSO.
  • It is a leveraged equity fund carrying a 2x daily return objective which introduces volatility risk.
  • The fund's top holdings include NVDA at 3.74 per cent and AAPL at 3.49 per cent concentration.
SSO

SSO

SSO

Pros

  • With net assets of $8.8 billion, SSO benefits from substantial liquidity and trading volume potential.
  • It has been in operation since 19 June 2006, providing a long-term track record for investors.
  • The fund features a more diversified portfolio with lower individual stock weights, such as NVDA at 5.70 per cent.

Considerations

  • SSO charges a higher expense ratio of 0.87 per cent compared to the 0.60 per cent of SPUU.
  • It yields only 0.63 per cent in dividends which is less attractive for income-focused investors.
  • The fund tracks leveraged daily returns with a 2x objective which can lead to compounding volatility.

Buy SPUU or SSO in Nemo

Nemo Logo Fade
🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

Frequently asked questions