What is the main difference between a semiconductor-specific fund and a broad information technology fund?

A semiconductor-specific fund, like the VanEck Semiconductor ETF, focuses exclusively on companies that design or manufacture chips, offering concentrated exposure to this single subsector. Conversely, a broad information technology fund, such as the Vanguard Information Technology ETF, holds a wider array of tech companies, including software, hardware, and internet firms alongside semiconductor makers. The key distinction is scope: the former is a niche, high-conviction bet on chip cycles, while the latter provides diversified exposure across the entire technology sector, mitigating the risk of any single subsector's downturn.

How do expense ratios impact long-term investment returns?

Expense ratios are annual fees deducted from a fund's assets, reducing the investor's net return. The Vanguard Information Technology ETF has a 0.09% expense ratio, while the VanEck Semiconductor ETF has 0.35%. This 0.26 percentage point difference may seem small, but over decades, it compounds significantly. Lower fees allow more of an investor's capital to remain invested and grow. Consequently, a fund with a lower expense ratio provides a higher net return than a higher-fee fund, assuming the gross performance of the underlying assets is identical.

What does 'net assets' indicate about an exchange-traded fund?

Net assets, or assets under management (AUM), represent the total market value of all securities held by the fund. High net assets, such as the $150.2 billion in the Vanguard Information Technology ETF compared to $74.1 billion in the VanEck Semiconductor ETF, often indicate greater liquidity. Larger funds typically have higher trading volumes, leading to tighter bid-ask spreads and lower transaction costs for investors. While size does not guarantee performance, it can influence the ease of buying and selling shares and the fund's ability to absorb institutional flows without impacting market prices.

Which investment goal is typically associated with a broad technology fund versus a semiconductor-specific fund?

A broad technology fund, like the Vanguard Information Technology ETF, is generally associated with goals requiring diversified sector exposure, capturing growth across software, hardware, and semiconductor companies while reducing single-stock risk. In contrast, a semiconductor-specific fund, such as the VanEck Semiconductor ETF, is typically associated with concentrated exposure to the chip industry, often driven by specific themes like AI demand or supply chain trends. The broad fund suits core sector allocation, whereas the specific fund suits satellite allocations or investors with a strong view on semiconductor cycles.

How does stock concentration affect risk in these two ETFs?

Stock concentration refers to the percentage of a fund’s assets held in its largest positions. The VanEck Semiconductor ETF has an extremely high single-stock concentration, with its top holding weighing 22.52%. This makes the fund's performance heavily reliant on that single company's results. The Vanguard Information Technology ETF also has a significant top holding at 17.74%, but its broader inclusion of mega-cap stocks like Apple and Microsoft dilutes this concentration. Higher concentration increases potential volatility if the top stock underperforms, while lower concentration offers more balanced sector exposure.

What are the differences in dividend yields between these funds?

The VanEck Semiconductor ETF has a dividend yield of 0.18%, while the Vanguard Information Technology ETF has a yield of 0.34%. Both yields are low compared to traditional income assets, reflecting the growth-oriented nature of the technology sector, where companies often reinvest profits rather than distributing them. The higher yield in the broader tech fund is due to the inclusion of mature companies with steady cash flows that pay dividends, whereas the semiconductor-specific fund focuses on companies that may prioritise reinvestment for R&D and capacity expansion, resulting in minimal income generation.

How similar are the top holdings of the VanEck Semiconductor ETF and the Vanguard Information Technology ETF?

There is notable overlap in the top holdings of both funds. Five companies appear in the top ten positions of both ETFs: NVDA, AMD, AVGO, MU, and INTC. However, the weights differ significantly. For example, NVDA accounts for 22.52% of the VanEck fund versus 17.74% of the Vanguard fund. This overlap means both funds will perform similarly during periods of strong semiconductor demand. The primary difference lies in the remaining holdings, where the Vanguard fund includes diverse non-semiconductor tech giants that the VanEck fund omits.

How might sector-specific market corrections affect these different types of tech ETFs?

During sector-specific corrections, a broad technology ETF like the Vanguard Information Technology ETF may experience diversification benefits if software or hardware stocks remain resilient while semiconductors decline. Its lower concentration in any single subsector can mitigate deep drawdowns. Conversely, a semiconductor-specific ETF like the VanEck Semiconductor ETF is highly exposed to chip cycle downturns. If the semiconductor subsector corrects due to oversupply or reduced demand, this fund would likely underperform the broader tech index, as its entire portfolio is sensitive to the same macroeconomic factors affecting chip manufacturers.

Why is the inception date relevant when comparing these two ETFs?

The inception date indicates how long a fund has been in existence, providing context for its track record. The Vanguard Information Technology ETF launched on January 26, 2004, whereas the VanEck Semiconductor ETF started on December 20, 2011. The older fund has experienced more full market cycles, offering a longer history of performance during different economic conditions. While past performance does not guarantee future results, a longer track record can provide more data for assessing how a fund handles volatility. The newer fund's performance history reflects a more recent era of rapid semiconductor demand growth and technological shifts.

What role do major chip manufacturers like TSM and ASML play in the semiconductor ETF?

The VanEck Semiconductor ETF includes major manufacturers and equipment suppliers, such as TSM and ASML, to provide diversified access across the chip supply chain. TSM represents pure-play manufacturing, while ASML provides critical lithography equipment. In contrast, the Vanguard Information Technology ETF has lower or no weights in some of these specific industrial tech firms compared to consumer and software giants. This composition allows the semiconductor ETF to capture trends in both production capacity and technological advancement within chip manufacturing, rather than just the final product sales of consumer electronics.

How do expense ratio differences influence the choice for buy-and-hold investors?

For buy-and-hold investors, the expense ratio is a critical component of long-term returns. The 0.09% expense ratio of the Vanguard Information Technology ETF is significantly lower than the 0.35% of the VanEck Semiconductor ETF. Over a 20-year period, this 0.26 percentage point difference compounds, meaning the lower-cost fund retains a larger share of capital. While the semiconductor fund might offer higher potential growth due to its focus, the cost drag is greater. Investors prioritising cost efficiency for core holdings often prefer the lower-fee option.

What educational considerations should be made when interpreting ETF comparison data?

When interpreting ETF comparison data, it is essential to understand that metrics like expense ratios, dividend yields, and holdings weights are snapshots in time and subject to change. For instance, the top holdings weights provided are as of the data fetch date. Students of finance should recognise that past performance and current structure do not predict future outcomes. Always consider the underlying index methodology and the specific risks associated with single-sector concentration versus diversified exposure. Use this data to understand fund structure, not to make trading decisions.

SMH vs VGT

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

This page compares SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) by examining expense ratios, holdings, dividend yields and how each fund tracks technology sector performance. Use these data points to evaluate differences in concentration and costs for these two technology-focused funds. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

SMH

Metric

VGT

0.35%

Expense Ratio

0.09%

0.18%

Dividend Yield

0.34%

$74.06B

Net Assets

$150.23B

Holdings

323

Dec 20, 2011

Inception Date

Jan 26, 2004

–

Index Tracked

–

Technology

Fund Category

Technology

VGT costs about $26.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	SMH	VGT
NVDANVIDIA Corporation	22.52%	17.74%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc.	6.20%	2.95%
AVGOBroadcom Inc.	5.68%	4.52%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.	5.64%	4.18%
INTCIntel Corporation	4.71%	1.54%

Discover More Comparisons

SMH vs XSD

Compare SMH and XSD semiconductor ETFs. Review fees, holdings, and dividends. Understand how each fund tracks the market. Neutral and educational analysis.

SMH vs SOXX

Compare SMH and SOXX on fees, holdings, dividends and index tracking to understand semiconductor ETF differences. Educational information only.

SMH vs SMHX

Compare SMH and SMHX. Both share a 0.35% expense ratio but differ in assets, yields, and holdings. SMH offers a long track record, while SMHX is newer.

Investment Analysis

SMH

Pros

SMH provides concentrated semiconductor exposure with a manageable 0.35% expense ratio.
Assets of $74.1 billion support liquidity and institutional trading efficiency for investors.
The fund includes major chip manufacturers like TSM and ASML for diversified supply chain access.

Considerations

The 0.35% expense ratio exceeds lower-cost broad tech alternatives available in the market.
Extremely high single-stock concentration risks portfolio volatility due to NVDA's 22.52% weighting.
A minimal 0.18% dividend yield limits income generation for yield-focused equity investors.

VGT

Pros

VGT maintains a notably low 0.09% expense ratio, enhancing long-term investor net returns.
Enormous assets of $150.2 billion ensure deep liquidity and tight trading spreads globally.
Broad exposure to software and hardware giants like AAPL and MSFT reduces single-sector risk.

Considerations

Overweight positions in mega-cap technology stocks dominate returns during sector-specific market corrections.
The 0.34% dividend yield remains very low despite the fund's substantial total asset base.
Inclusion of numerous large-cap firms may dilute exposure compared to pure-play semiconductor strategies.

About SMH and VGT

SMH (SMH)

The VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) offers investors a way to access the technology sector, specifically focusing on semiconductor companies. Launched in December 2011, this fund has grown significantly, managing over USD 74 billion in net assets as of its most recent report. It holds a concentrated portfolio of 26 companies, providing targeted exposure to key players in the chip manufacturing industry. With an expense ratio of 0.35%, it is positioned as a cost-effective option for those seeking sector-specific diversification. While the dividend yield is modest at 0.18%, the primary appeal of SMH lies in its potential to capitalise on technological advancements and digital demand. However, it is essential for investors to recognise that technology sector performance can fluctuate, and values may rise and fall. This ETF serves as an educational tool for understanding semiconductor market dynamics rather than a guaranteed return vehicle.

VGT (VGT)

The Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) aims to provide investors with exposure to companies operating in the technology sector, encompassing both US and international firms. As a broad market fund, it seeks to track the performance of the technology industry by holding a diversified basket of over 300 stocks. With a low expense ratio of 0.09%, it offers a cost-efficient way to gain access to major tech players. Investors should note that while the fund offers potential growth tied to technological innovation, it is heavily concentrated in the technology sector. This concentration means its value can fluctuate significantly based on sector-specific trends, regulatory changes, and market sentiment. Returns are not guaranteed, and values can rise and fall, making it suitable for those who understand the risks associated with sector-focused investing.

Buy SMH or VGT in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

SMH vs VGT

Fund Snapshot