
SMH vs SMHX
Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.
Compare VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX). Review fees, holdings, dividends, and how each fund tracks its market. Educational content, not financial advice.
Compare VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX). Review fees, holdings, dividends, and how each fund tracks its market. Educational content, not financial advice.
Investment Analysis

SMH
SMH
Pros
- $74.1 billion net assets imply strong liquidity and potential tight trading spreads.
- Inception in December 2011 provides a long, established track record for investors.
- Inclusion of TSM, ASML, and Intel diversifies exposure across global supply chains.
Considerations
- A 0.35% expense ratio is relatively high for a broad semiconductor index fund.
- The 22.52% weight in NVDA creates significant single-stock concentration risk.
- The 0.18% dividend yield is low compared to broader equity market averages.
SMHX
SMHX
Pros
- Focus on fabless models may favour design and IP firms over capital-intensive fabs.
- 14.74% weight in Broadcom offers distinct exposure within the fabless sector.
- 272 million net assets indicate a viable, albeit smaller, ETF structure.
Considerations
- Inception in August 2024 means limited historical performance data is available.
- NVDA's 23.08% weight concentrates risk in one leading semiconductor designer.
- The 0.02% dividend yield offers negligible income to shareholders.
Buy SMH or SMHX in Nemo
Zero Commission
Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.
Trusted & Regulated
Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.
6% Interest on Cash
Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

