What is the primary difference between SCHC and VOO?

SCHC focuses on international small and mid-cap companies, offering exposure to foreign markets. In contrast, VOO tracks large-cap U.S. companies within the S&P 500 index. These funds serve distinct roles in a portfolio: one provides geographic and capitalisation diversification outside the U.S., while the other captures domestic large-cap performance. Investors often hold both to balance local market strength with global equity exposure, though each carries unique risks tied to its respective market segment and currency environment.

What does 'index tracked' mean when it is not available?

When 'index tracked' is not available, as with SCHC and VOO in this dataset, it means the specific benchmark index used by the fund is not disclosed in the provided data. This limits understanding of exact composition criteria. Investors should consult fund prospectuses for full details. Without this, comparing methodology, rebalancing rules, or index concentration becomes difficult. Educational pages should highlight this gap to prevent assumptions about how each fund selects and weights its holdings.

How do expense ratios impact long-term investment returns?

Expense ratios directly reduce net returns annually. VOO charges 0.03%, while SCHC charges 0.06%. The 0.03 percentage point difference may seem minor but compounds over decades. For example, on a $10,000 investment, VOO costs $3 yearly versus $6 for SCHC. Lower fees generally enhance long-term wealth accumulation, assuming similar performance. However, fees alone do not guarantee better outcomes; fund objectives, risks, and market conditions must also be considered alongside cost efficiency.

Which fund offers a higher dividend yield according to the data?

Based on the provided figures, SCHC offers a higher dividend yield at 3.31%, compared to VOO’s 1.03%. This makes SCHC more attractive for income-focused investors seeking regular distributions. However, higher yield does not always equate to better total returns; it may reflect lower growth expectations or higher risk. Investors should examine the sustainability of dividends and the underlying companies’ financial health rather than focusing solely on yield percentages when evaluating income potential.

How do the top holdings of SCHC and VOO differ?

SCHC’s top holdings, such as SSRM at 0.29% and FRO at 0.27%, represent tiny fractions of the fund, indicating broad diversification across many small-cap stocks. VOO’s top holdings, including NVDA at 8.08% and AAPL at 7.03%, constitute significant concentration in large U.S. tech and consumer firms. This structural difference means VOO’s performance is more tied to a few giants, while SCHC’s outcome depends on the collective movement of numerous smaller foreign companies.

Are there any shared top-10 holdings between SCHC and VOO?

The data confirms there are none among the listed top holdings shared between SCHC and VOO. This indicates minimal direct overlap in their most prominent positions. Such divergence supports the case for holding both funds if seeking diversified exposure across different geographies and market capitalisations. Lack of overlap means their performance is likely driven by distinct factors, reducing correlation and potentially smoothing portfolio volatility when combined, though sector and market trends can still create indirect links.

What market segment does SCHC target compared to VOO?

SCHC targets the foreign small and mid-cap equity segment, providing access to companies headquartered outside the United States with smaller market capitalisations. VOO focuses on large-cap U.S. stocks within the S&P 500. Small-caps often exhibit higher growth potential but come with increased volatility and less analyst coverage. U.S. large-caps are generally more stable and liquid. The choice depends on whether an investor seeks global diversification in less-mature markets or concentrated exposure to established U.S. giants.

Why is net asset value important for ETFs like SCHC and VOO?

Net assets reflect the fund’s size and liquidity. VOO exceeds $1 trillion in net assets, ensuring deep market liquidity and tight bid-ask spreads, beneficial for large trades. SCHC has $5.8 billion, still substantial for stability but less liquid than VOO. Higher assets can reduce tracking error and operational risks. However, size alone does not guarantee performance. Investors should consider how liquidity affects entry/exit costs and how asset scale influences management efficiency and expense ratio sustainability over time.

How do sector weight data gaps affect comparison?

The data states sector weights are not available for both SCHC and VOO. This omission prevents direct comparison of industry concentration, such as technology or healthcare exposure. Without this, investors cannot assess sector-specific risks or diversification benefits accurately. For instance, VOO’s large-cap focus may skew towards tech, while SCHC’s small-cap foreign focus might lean towards industrials or materials. Checking official fund documents is essential to fill this analytical gap before making portfolio decisions.

What inception dates are provided for SCHC and VOO?

SCHC’s inception date is listed as Jan 14, 2010, while VOO’s is Sep 7, 2010. These dates indicate both funds have been operating for over a decade, providing long enough histories for performance evaluation. However, the data does not include historical returns, so investors cannot directly compare past performance. Knowledge of these dates helps assess fund stability and track record longevity, though recent market conditions may differ significantly from the initial years post-inception.

Do ETF dividends work the same as stock dividends?

ETF dividends represent distributions of income earned by the underlying holdings, similar to stock dividends but pooled across many companies. SCHC’s 3.31% yield reflects aggregated payments from its foreign small-cap holdings, while VOO’s 1.03% yield comes from U.S. large-cap dividends. Payments are typically quarterly, but frequency and tax treatment vary. Unlike single stocks, ETF dividends depend on the collective performance of numerous companies, offering diversified income streams but with less predictability than individual firm payouts.

Which investing goal is typically associated with SCHC?

SCHC is often associated with goals seeking diversification into international markets and exposure to smaller companies. Its higher dividend yield of 3.31% also aligns with income generation objectives from foreign equities. The fund’s structure, holding numerous small positions, reduces single-stock risk. However, it may suit investors with higher risk tolerance due to small-cap volatility and currency fluctuations. It complements U.S.-focused portfolios by adding geographic breadth, potentially enhancing long-term growth through emerging market dynamics.

SCHC vs VOO

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in October 2026.

Compare SCHC (Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF) and VOO (S&P 500 Vanguard ETF) to assess fees, holdings, dividends, and how each fund tracks its market. SCHC focuses on foreign small/mid-caps, while VOO tracks large US companies. Educational content, not financial advice.

Compare SCHC (Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF) and VOO (S&P 500 Vanguard ETF) to assess fees, holdings, dividends, and how each fund tracks its market. SCHC focuses on foreign small/mid-caps...

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

SCHC

Metric

VOO

0.06%

Expense Ratio

0.03%

3.31%

Dividend Yield

1.03%

$5.83B

Net Assets

$1.08T

2,196

Holdings

516

Jan 14, 2010

Inception Date

Sep 7, 2010

–

Index Tracked

–

Foreign Small/Mid Blend

Fund Category

Large Blend

VOO costs about $3.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

These funds do not share any of their top holdings.

Discover More Comparisons

SCHC vs SCHD

Compare SCHC and SCHD ETFs. Review fees, holdings, dividends, and tracking. Both have 0.06% expense ratios but differ in strategy and asset size.

SCHC vs VXUS

Compare SCHC and VXUS international ETFs. Review 0.06% vs 0.05% expenses, dividend yields, holdings and tracking data to assess each fund's features.

SCHC vs SCZ

Compare SCHC vs SCZ on fees, holdings and dividends. SCZ offers $12.9bn assets with 0.40% fee, while SCHC has $5.8bn assets and a lower 0.06% fee.

Investment Analysis

SCHC

Pros

Extremely low expense ratio of 0.06 percent reduces long-term investment costs.
Substantial net assets of $5.8 billion enhance liquidity and fund stability.
High dividend yield of 3.31 percent offers attractive regular income generation.

Considerations

Specific index tracking methodology information is currently not available for this fund.
Sector weight distribution data remains unavailable, obscuring portfolio concentration risks.
Top individual holdings represent tiny fractions, with limited single-stock visibility.

VOO

Pros

Exceptionally low expense ratio of 0.03 percent minimizes ongoing management costs.
Massive net assets exceeding $1 trillion provide superior liquidity and market depth.
Tracks a broad, established large-cap index with transparent holdings disclosure.

Considerations

Relatively low dividend yield of 1.03 percent may not suit income-focused investors.
Top ten holdings constitute significant concentration, with individual weights exceeding one percent.
Specific sector weight breakdown data is currently not available for review.

Related Market Insights

Capital Returns: The Shareholder Yield Play

Explore Capital Returns, a Neme focused on companies rewarding shareholders via buybacks & dividends. Invest in robust firms like Schwab with Nemo's thematic baskets.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

25 July 2025

Read Insight

Related Market Insights

Capital Returns: The Shareholder Yield Play

Explore Capital Returns, a Neme focused on companies rewarding shareholders via buybacks & dividends. Invest in robust firms like Schwab with Nemo's thematic baskets.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

25 July 2025

Read Insight

About SCHC and VOO

SCHC (SCHC)

Schwab International Small‑Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) offers investors broad exposure to small‑capitalisation companies in developed markets outside the United States. The fund seeks to track an index of international small‑cap equities, providing diversified access across countries and sectors in a single, exchange‑listed vehicle. Small‑cap stocks can offer attractive long‑term growth potential due to their capacity for rapid expansion, but they also tend to be more volatile, less liquid and more sensitive to local economic and currency shifts than large‑cap or domestic holdings. SCHC can complement a global equity allocation, but investors should expect wider performance swings and be mindful of political, market and currency risks. This information is educational and not personal financial advice. Consider your investment objectives, time horizon and risk tolerance, and consult a financial adviser if unsure whether this ETF suits your needs.

VOO (VOO)

VOO is Vanguard’s exchange-traded fund designed to track the S&P 500 Index, offering broad exposure to about 500 of the largest publicly traded US companies. It aims to replicate the index’s performance minus fees by holding the same stocks in similar proportions, making it a straightforward, passive way to access large‑cap US equities. Investors commonly use VOO as a core holding for long‑term growth or as a simple building block in a diversified portfolio. It typically offers high liquidity and regular dividend distributions from underlying companies. As with any equity investment, VOO’s value can rise or fall with the market, and past performance is not a guide to future returns. Fees, trading costs and potential tracking error reduce returns slightly. This information is general and educational only and not personalised financial advice — consider your own circumstances or speak to a qualified adviser before investing.

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Capital Returns: The Shareholder Yield Play

Following Charles Schwab's massive $20 billion stock buyback and dividend increase, this theme focuses on other financially robust companies that are similarly rewarding their investors. The strategy is to invest in firms with strong cash flows and a commitment to returning capital to shareholders.

Published: 25 July 2025

Explore Basket

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Capital Returns: The Shareholder Yield Play

Following Charles Schwab's massive $20 billion stock buyback and dividend increase, this theme focuses on other financially robust companies that are similarly rewarding their investors. The strategy is to invest in firms with strong cash flows and a commitment to returning capital to shareholders.

Published: 25 July 2025

Explore Basket

SCHC vs VOO

Fund Snapshot