

QQQ vs SCHG
Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.
QQQ tracks the Nasdaq-100 with 104 holdings for a 0.18% expense ratio, while SCHG tracks the Dow Jones US Large-Cap Growth index with 196 holdings for 0.04%. The top names overlap heavily, but SCHG weights NVIDIA at 10.67% and Apple at 9.94% versus 8.46% and 7.89% in QQQ. QQQ suits Nasdaq-focused traders; SCHG suits low-cost growth investors. Educational content, not financial advice.
QQQ tracks the Nasdaq-100 with 104 holdings for a 0.18% expense ratio, while SCHG tracks the Dow Jones US Large-Cap Growth index with 196 holdings for 0.04%. The top names overlap heavily, but SCHG we...
Investment Analysis

QQQ
QQQ
Pros
- Direct exposure to the Nasdaq-100, the most widely followed US growth benchmark
- Around $484 billion in net assets and a track record back to 1999
- Holds Micron at 4.85% and Tesla at 2.92%, names absent from SCHG's top ten
Considerations
- Expense ratio of 0.18% is more than four times SCHG's 0.04%
- Only 104 holdings, all listed on Nasdaq, so exchange rather than style defines the fund
- Excludes non-Nasdaq growth companies such as Eli Lilly that SCHG includes

SCHG
SCHG
Pros
- Expense ratio of 0.04%, about $4 a year per $10,000 invested
- Selects growth stocks from the whole US large-cap market, not one exchange
- 196 holdings give somewhat broader coverage than QQQ's 104
Considerations
- More concentrated at the top, with NVIDIA and Apple above 20% combined
- Smaller than QQQ at about $66 billion in net assets
- Dividend yield of 0.37% is slightly below QQQ's already low 0.41%
Buy QQQ or SCHG in Nemo
Zero Commission
Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.
Trusted & Regulated
Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.
6% Interest on Cash
Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

