How do the expense ratios of ILIT and LITP differ, and what does this mean for investors?

ILIT carries an expense ratio of 0.47%, while LITP's is 0.65%. This 0.18 percentage point difference implies that, all else equal, ILIT is less costly to hold over time. Lower expense ratios reduce the drag on returns, which can be significant in long-term investing. However, investors should also consider other factors such as liquidity, dividend yield, and portfolio composition when comparing these ETFs.

What do the dividend yields of ILIT and LITP tell us about their income potential?

ILIT has a dividend yield of 2.30%, whereas LITP offers 8.54%. These figures suggest that LITP may provide higher income payouts relative to its share price, assuming the yields remain stable. Dividend yields fluctuate with fund performance and distribution policies. Investors focusing on income generation might prefer LITP for its higher yield, but they should also weigh other factors like sector concentration and expense ratios.

How do the top holdings of ILIT and LITP compare?

Both ILIT and LITP share top-10 holdings including SQM, ALB, and LAR, indicating some similarity in their exposure to key lithium producers. However, LITP is more concentrated with only four top holdings (SQM, ALB, LAC, and LAR) compared to ILIT's broader selection. This difference suggests that LITP carries higher idiosyncratic risk due to its lack of diversification among its primary holdings.

How does the net asset size of ILIT and LITP affect investors?

ILIT's $14 million net assets could lead to challenges with liquidity and bid-ask spreads, potentially affecting trade execution. In contrast, LITP, with $37 million, has a slightly larger asset base that improves liquidity. Larger funds generally face lower risks of wide bid-ask spreads, making trading more efficient and less costly for investors.

What does the early inception date of LITP mean for investors?

LITP's inception in February 2023 provides a marginally longer performance track record compared to ILIT, which launched in June 2023. This additional time allows for slightly more data to assess its ability to track its underlying sector. However, with both funds being recent entrants, historical data remains limited, and future performance should not be assumed based on these short periods.

Why is transparency important in ETF portfolio construction?

Transparency in ETF portfolio construction, such as disclosed index methodologies and sector weights, allows investors to assess how a fund aims to replicate its benchmark. Neither ILIT nor LITP publishes index methodology details, which may reduce investor confidence regarding their construction and management practices. Lack of transparency can make it difficult to predict how the funds will respond to market changes.

What are the potential implications of concentration risk in LITP?

With its top holdings comprising just four companies, LITP is more susceptible to concentration risk. This means the performance of the fund is heavily influenced by the fortunes of these specific companies. If any of these holdings experience adverse conditions, the fund could suffer disproportionate losses compared to more diversified ETFs like ILIT, which includes a broader range of stocks.

What should investors understand about tracking in thematic ETFs?

Thematic ETFs aim to capture specific sector trends, such as lithium mining, through targeted holdings. Unlike broad index ETFs, their tracking depends on portfolio composition rather than replicating a well-known benchmark. For example, both ILIT and LITP include major lithium producers like SQM and Albemarle, but their lack of disclosed index methodologies means investors should evaluate how similar or distinct their exposure strategies might be.

What are the benefits of moderate dividend yields in volatile sectors?

A moderate dividend yield, such as ILIT's 2.30%, offers some income generation while remaining within the context of a volatile sector like lithium mining. This yield can provide stability to investor returns during periods of heightened price fluctuations. Unlike higher yields, moderate dividends may also reflect a balanced approach to reinvestment and distribution, supporting long-term sustainability.

How might liquidity concerns affect trading in ILIT compared to LITP?

Liquidity concerns in ILIT, given its smaller net assets of $14 million, could lead to wider bid-ask spreads and higher transaction costs. Conversely, LITP's larger asset base of $37 million suggests better liquidity, allowing for more efficient trading. Investors should consider these differences as they can impact the ease and cost of entering or exiting positions.

Why is the absence of sector weights data a concern for investors?

The absence of sector weights data in both ILIT and LITP limits transparency and complicates portfolio analysis. Without this information, investors cannot fully assess the distribution of holdings across sub-sectors or industries. This lack of detail can make it difficult to determine the level of diversification or concentration risk, which are critical factors in managing a thematic ETF investment.

How do ETF distributions work, and why does the yield matter?

ETF distributions typically involve dividends from underlying stocks or interest payments, passed to investors. The dividend yield represents the annual distribution relative to the ETF's share price. A higher yield, such as LITP's 8.54%, indicates a greater return via distributions but doesn't guarantee stability or growth of the underlying fund. Conversely, ILIT's 2.30% yield reflects lower immediate income but may align with its moderate sector exposure. Investors should focus on the sustainability and total return profile rather than yield alone.

ILIT vs LITP

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF (ILIT) with Sprott Fds Lithium Miners Etf (LITP). This page examines their expense ratios (0.47% vs 0.65%), net assets, dividend yields (2.30% vs 8.54%), and key holdings like SQM, ALB, and LAR. See how each fund tracks its market focus. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

ILIT

Metric

LITP

0.47%

Expense Ratio

0.65%

2.30%

Dividend Yield

8.54%

$13.60M

Net Assets

$36.54M

Holdings

Jun 21, 2023

Inception Date

Feb 1, 2023

–

Index Tracked

–

Natural Resources

Fund Category

Natural Resources

ILIT costs about $18.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	ILIT	LITP
SQMSociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.	7.91%	9.85%
ALBAlbemarle Corporation	7.69%	9.45%
LARLithium Argentina AG	3.68%	4.37%

Investment Analysis

ILIT

Pros

Lower expense ratio of 0.47 percent reduces cost drag versus the peer fund.
Larger top holdings like SQM and Albemarle provide liquid core exposure to lithium.
Moderate dividend yield of 2.30 percent offers some income within a volatile sector.

Considerations

Small net assets of 14 million may affect liquidity and bid ask spreads.
Recent inception date of June 2023 limits available historical tracking data.
No published index methodology or sector weights reduces transparency on portfolio construction.

LITP

Pros

Higher dividend yield of 8.54 percent may attract income focused investors.
Slightly larger assets at 37 million improve liquidity compared to the smaller rival.
Early inception in February 2023 provides a marginally longer performance track record.

Considerations

Expense ratio of 0.65 percent is relatively high for a thematic natural resources ETF.
No issuer information or index details disclosed raises questions about fund governance.
Concentration in four top holdings including SQM Albemarle LAC and LAR increases idiosyncratic risk.

Related Market Insights

Paper vs Physical: The Smart Way to Play Commodities

Balance commodity price speculation with equity stakes in producers. Diversify exposure to raw materials, hedge inflation, and invest smart with Nemo.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

25 July 2025

Read Insight

Related Market Insights

Paper vs Physical: The Smart Way to Play Commodities

Balance commodity price speculation with equity stakes in producers. Diversify exposure to raw materials, hedge inflation, and invest smart with Nemo.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

25 July 2025

Read Insight

About ILIT and LITP

ILIT (ILIT)

The iShares Lithium Miners and Producers ETF (ticker: ILIT) provides targeted exposure to companies involved in the extraction, processing and production of lithium — a critical metal for rechargeable batteries used in electric vehicles and grid storage. As a thematic, sector-focused ETF, ILIT bundles miners and producers into a single tradable instrument, offering broader diversification than owning one company but concentrating risk in one commodity sector. Performance is closely tied to lithium demand and prices, mining project execution, permitting and geopolitical factors; returns can be volatile and are not guaranteed. Investors should check the fund’s prospectus, expense ratio, index methodology and liquidity before investing. ILIT may suit those seeking a focused way to participate in the battery-materials supply chain, but it carries commodity, operational and regulatory risks. This is educational information, not personalised advice — values can fall as well as rise and past performance is not a reliable guide.

LITP (LITP)

The ticker LITP is provided without an associated company name, so treat it as unverified until you confirm the issuer and exchange. When faced with an unfamiliar ticker, investors should first identify the official company name, country of incorporation and the exchange where it trades. Key checks include market capitalisation, recent financial statements, revenue and cash trends, debt levels, analyst coverage, and any regulatory or sector-specific developments. Also review trading liquidity — low volume can mean wide spreads and higher volatility. Compare valuation metrics with sector peers and read the latest company filings and news releases. This summary is educational only and not personalised advice. Markets are unpredictable: values can rise and fall, and past performance does not guarantee future returns. If you consider investing, verify primary sources and, if needed, seek independent financial advice to assess suitability for your goals and risk tolerance.

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Paper Vs. Physical

Discover a carefully curated collection of investments that balance commodity price speculation with the companies that bring those resources to market. Our analysts have selected these assets to give you exposure to both sides of the materials economy in one strategic package.

Published: 17 June 2025

Explore Basket

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Paper Vs. Physical

Published: 17 June 2025

Explore Basket

Buy ILIT or LITP in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

ILIT vs LITP

Fund Snapshot

Investment Analysis

ILIT

Pros

Considerations

LITP

Pros

Considerations

Related Market Insights

Paper vs Physical: The Smart Way to Play Commodities

Related Market Insights

Paper vs Physical: The Smart Way to Play Commodities

About ILIT and LITP

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Paper Vs. Physical

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Paper Vs. Physical

Buy ILIT or LITP in Nemo

Zero Commission

Trusted & Regulated

6% Interest on Cash

Frequently asked questions

How do the expense ratios of ILIT and LITP differ, and what does this mean for investors?

What do the dividend yields of ILIT and LITP tell us about their income potential?

How do the top holdings of ILIT and LITP compare?

How does the net asset size of ILIT and LITP affect investors?

What does the early inception date of LITP mean for investors?

Why is transparency important in ETF portfolio construction?

What are the potential implications of concentration risk in LITP?

What should investors understand about tracking in thematic ETFs?

What are the benefits of moderate dividend yields in volatile sectors?

How might liquidity concerns affect trading in ILIT compared to LITP?

Why is the absence of sector weights data a concern for investors?

How do ETF distributions work, and why does the yield matter?

Fund Snapshot

About ILIT and LITP

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Paper Vs. Physical

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Paper Vs. Physical

Related Market Insights

Paper vs Physical: The Smart Way to Play Commodities

Related Market Insights

Paper vs Physical: The Smart Way to Play Commodities