What are the primary differences in the expense ratios between IJH and SPMD, and how might this impact long-term returns?

SPMD has a lower expense ratio of 0.03% compared to IJH's 0.05%. While the 0.02 percentage point difference seems small, over long investment horizons, even minor fee disparities can compound, potentially affecting net returns. Investors should note that these are recurring annual costs. Selecting funds with lower fees can enhance overall profitability without necessarily increasing risk, assuming the holdings and strategies remain similar. However, other factors like tracking error and liquidity should also be evaluated alongside fees.

How do the inception dates and asset sizes of IJH and SPMD reflect their maturity and liquidity?

IJH was launched on May 22, 2000, and manages $123.7 billion in assets, whereas SPMD started on November 8, 2005, with $18.6 billion. The earlier inception and larger asset base of IJH suggest it has a longer operational history and potentially greater liquidity and stability. However, SPMD's size is still substantial, indicating it is a well-established fund. Larger asset bases often attract institutional investors, which can influence trading volumes and bid-ask spreads.

What does it mean that specific top holdings and sector weights are not available for both funds?

The data provided does not include detailed top holdings for IJH or specific sector weights for either fund. This absence means investors cannot directly compare portfolio composition or concentration risks based solely on this information. While both funds track mid-cap indices, the lack of granular data limits the ability to assess overlaps or deviations in their underlying strategies. Investors should consult official fund documentation or updated financial reports for complete holding details.

How does the dividend yield difference between IJH and SPMD affect income-focused investors?

SPMD offers a slightly higher dividend yield of 1.31%, compared to IJH's 1.23%. For investors prioritizing income, even small yield differences can influence distribution amounts over time. However, dividends are not guaranteed and depend on the underlying companies' performance. Yield should not be the sole factor in decision-making; total return, which combines capital appreciation and dividends, provides a more comprehensive view of investment performance. Investors should also consider tax implications of dividend distributions.

How should investors interpret the shared top-10 holdings data, and what does it imply about the two funds?

There are no shared top-10 holdings between IJH and SPMD, suggesting different portfolio compositions despite both being mid-cap blend ETFs. This implies they may select distinct companies to mirror the broader market or apply different weighting strategies. Lack of overlap means performance drivers could diverge significantly, offering potential diversification benefits but also varying risk exposures. Investors should investigate further to understand the criteria used for stock selection and how each fund tracks its index.

What role do market conditions play in the performance of mid-cap ETFs like IJH and SPMD?

Mid-cap ETFs generally perform well during economic expansion periods when smaller companies grow faster than larger firms. During market downturns, mid-caps may be more volatile than large caps. The performance of IJH and SPMD depends on the broader economy, interest rates, and investor sentiment. Since both funds are affected by similar market factors, their relative performance may vary based on individual stock selections and fees. Understanding these dynamics helps set realistic expectations.

How can investors evaluate fund transparency when certain details like sector weights are missing?

When key metrics such as sector weights are unavailable, investors should seek official fund prospectuses or websites for comprehensive data. Transparency is critical for assessing risk and alignment with investment goals. Missing information may also indicate the need for further due diligence before making investment decisions. Comparing funds based on available data while acknowledging limitations ensures a balanced evaluation. Staying informed through reliable sources helps mitigate uncertainty arising from incomplete datasets.

What does the term 'tracking method' refer to, and how might it apply to IJH and SPMD?

The tracking method refers to how closely an ETF replicates its target index, either through full replication or sampling. While specific details are not available for IJH and SPMD, both aim to mirror mid-cap indices. Full replication involves buying all securities in the index, whereas sampling selects a subset. The method impacts tracking error and costs. Investors should review fund documentation to understand their respective strategies and how these might affect performance relative to the benchmark.

How do the net asset values (NAV) of IJH and SPMD impact investor perception and marketability?

Although net asset value (NAV) itself does not indicate a fund's performance, larger assets under management (AUM) like IJH's $123.7 billion often enhance credibility and marketability. SPMD's $18.6 billion still positions it as a significant player. Higher AUM can lead to economies of scale, potentially lowering operational costs. However, NAV and AUM should not overshadow other critical metrics like expense ratios and dividend yields. Investors must consider a holistic view when evaluating funds.

What are the practical steps to compare two ETFs when some data fields are incomplete?

Start by analysing the available data, such as expense ratios, dividend yields, and inception dates. Recognise the limitations, like missing sector weights or top holdings. Next, consult official sources, such as fund fact sheets or regulatory filings, for comprehensive details. Consider how each fund aligns with your investment goals and risk tolerance. Finally, monitor performance over time to evaluate tracking accuracy and total returns. This structured approach ensures informed decision-making despite data gaps.

IJH vs SPMD

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF (SPMD). This page examines fees, holdings, dividends and tracking methods. IJH has a 0.05% expense ratio versus 0.03% for SPMD. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

IJH

Metric

SPMD

0.05%

Expense Ratio

0.03%

1.23%

Dividend Yield

1.31%

$123.67B

Net Assets

$18.64B

413

Holdings

403

May 22, 2000

Inception Date

Nov 8, 2005

–

Index Tracked

–

Mid-Cap Blend

Fund Category

Mid-Cap Blend

SPMD costs about $2.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

These funds do not share any of their top holdings.

Discover More Comparisons

IJH vs MDY

Compare IJH and MDY fees of 0.05% vs 0.23%, dividends, holdings and tracking. Assess mid-cap ETF differences using factual data for informed research.

IJH vs VO

Compare IJH and VO on fees, dividends and holdings. IJH costs 0.05 percent while VO costs 0.03 percent. Explore yield data and transparency.

IJH vs SCHM

Compare IJH and SCHM mid-cap ETFs. IJH costs 0.05% while SCHM is 0.03%. Review dividend yields, asset sizes and top holdings to decide which fits your goals.

Investment Analysis

IJH

Pros

The fund offers a low 0.05% expense ratio for core mid-cap exposure.
It has accumulated substantial net assets of $123.7 billion.
It provides an inception date of May 22, 2000, indicating a long history.

Considerations

The dividend yield of 1.23% is slightly lower than the comparison fund.
Specific top holdings data are currently not available for review.
Current sector weights breakdowns are not available in the provided dataset.

SPMD

Pros

The 0.03% expense ratio is lower than the comparison fund's 0.05%.
It features a slightly higher dividend yield of 1.31%.
Top holdings data are provided, allowing for specific concentration checks.

Considerations

With $18.6 billion in net assets, it is smaller than the comparison fund.
The inception date of November 8, 2005, is more recent than the comparison fund.
Sector weight details remain unavailable in the supplied data.

About IJH and SPMD

IJH (IJH)

The iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH) offers investors exposure to a broad range of mid-capitalisation companies within the United States. Categorized as a Mid-Cap Blend fund, it aims to track the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index, which represents approximately the middle two-thirds of the investable U.S. equity market. With net assets exceeding USD 123 billion, it is one of the largest ETFs in its category, providing substantial liquidity. The fund holds 413 distinct companies, allowing for diversified exposure across various sectors. It features a low expense ratio of 0.05%, making it a cost-effective tool for building core portfolios. Established in May 2000, this fund has a long history of operational stability. While it currently lists a dividend yield of 1.23%, it is important to note that dividend distributions are not guaranteed and can fluctuate based on the underlying holdings' performance. As with any equity investment, the value of this ETF can go down as well as up, and past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.

SPMD (SPMD)

The SPDR Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF offers investors exposure to mid-capitalisation companies listed in the United States. This fund aims to track the performance of a broad index of mid-cap stocks, providing a blend of growth potential and relative stability. With a very low expense ratio of 0.03%, it is designed to be cost-effective for long-term holdings. The fund holds over 400 companies, spreading risk across various sectors within the mid-cap market segment. Mid-cap companies are often seen as a sweet spot between the high growth potential of small caps and the stability of large caps, though they can still exhibit higher volatility than large-cap stocks. Investors should remember that share values can go down as well as up, and returns are not guaranteed.

Buy IJH or SPMD in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

IJH vs SPMD

Fund Snapshot