What are ultrashort bond ETFs?

Ultrashort bond ETFs, such as ICSH and PULS, invest in high-quality, short-term debt securities with low maturity profiles. The goal is to preserve capital while generating some income, with less volatility than longer-duration bond funds. Investors use them to reduce interest rate sensitivity while still earning yield. Because the bonds are short-term, the value of these ETFs tends to be more stable. These funds differ in fee structure, yield and operational history, which can influence their performance and cost efficiency over time.

What does expense ratio mean in ETFs?

The expense ratio is the annual fee charged by an ETF to manage the fund. It is deducted from the fund's assets and reduces investors' returns. For example, ICSH has an expense ratio of 0.08%, which is lower than PULS's 0.15%. This 0.07% difference means ICSH costs investors 7 basis points less each year, providing a slight advantage in net returns over time. Lower expense ratios are generally preferred, as they mean less cost drag on investment returns.

What is dividend yield in ETFs?

Dividend yield shows how much income an ETF pays out relative to its current price, expressed as a percentage. It is calculated by dividing the fund's most recent distributions by its price. ICSH currently offers a dividend yield of 4.17%, which is lower than PULS's 4.42%. A higher yield can provide more income but doesn't necessarily indicate a better fund. Yield should be considered alongside other factors, such as expense ratios and fund stability.

What is the difference in fund size?

Net assets reflect a fund's size, which influences trading liquidity and operational efficiency. PULS, with $19.3 billion in net assets, is significantly larger than ICSH's $8.9 billion. Larger funds typically benefit from better liquidity and tighter bid-ask spreads. However, fund size alone does not determine overall performance. Investors should also consider factors such as expense ratio, track record, and portfolio composition. Both funds are large enough to support substantial trading activity.

Why does fund age matter?

The operational history of a fund provides more data points to assess its consistency and performance. ICSH has been active since December 2013, giving it over a decade of performance history, while PULS was launched in April 2018. A longer history allows investors to evaluate how a fund has performed across multiple market cycles. However, the relevance of this data is often limited by changing interest rate and bond market conditions. Both funds are well-established in the ultrashort bond category.

What are holdings, and why do they matter?

Fund holdings refer to the actual securities the ETF owns. Knowing top holdings helps investors understand the fund's investment strategy. For PULS, one detailed top holding is shown, while ICSH does not currently disclose this information. This difference in transparency may influence investment decisions. However, both funds are categorized as ultrashort bond ETFs, suggesting they generally invest in similar types of short-duration debt.

Do ICSH and PULS have any overlapping holdings?

Based on available data, there are no overlapping top-10 holdings between ICSH and PULS. This means the ETFs do not share their most significant individual positions in common. While both are classified as ultrashort bond funds, the absence of overlap indicates that the funds may hold different specific bonds or have different portfolio management approaches. The difference in their portfolios may also reflect the lack of detailed disclosure for ICSH's holdings.

Which fund has a higher dividend yield?

Based on the data, PULS offers a dividend yield of 4.42%, which is higher than ICSH's 4.17%. A higher yield means that, at the current share price, the fund distributes a greater proportion of income relative to its value. This can be appealing for income-focused investors, but a higher yield should not be the sole focus. It must be considered alongside other factors like fund size, expense ratio, and the stability of the distributions.

How to compare these ETFs for income investing?

For income investors, both ICSH and PULS are relevant options within the ultrashort bond ETF category. Income investors often prioritise yield and fund stability. PULS offers a higher dividend yield of 4.42%, but also comes with a higher expense ratio of 0.15%. ICSH has a lower expense ratio of 0.08% but a lower yield of 4.17%. The choice depends on whether an investor prefers maximising current income or minimising costs over the long term.

What are the key considerations?

The key factors to consider when comparing ultrashort bond ETFs like ICSH and PULS include expense ratios, net asset value, dividend yields, and holdings transparency. ICSH offers a lower expense ratio but has a lower dividend yield and less publicly available information about its top holdings compared to PULS. PULS provides a higher dividend yield but with a slightly higher expense ratio and a shorter operational history. The best choice depends on the investor's specific goals and risk tolerance.

Which fund is better for low-cost investing?

For low-cost investing, ICSH is the clear choice, as it has a lower expense ratio of 0.08% compared to PULS's 0.15%. Over time, the 0.07% difference can lead to slightly better net returns for ICSH, especially if market conditions remain unchanged. However, the fee difference is small, and other factors such as dividend yield and portfolio composition should also be considered. The best fund for low costs must be aligned with the investor's overall strategy.

What is a good next step for a new investor?

A good next step is to review the official prospectuses for both ICSH and PULS. This provides the most current information on fees, holdings, investment strategy, and risks. It is also beneficial to understand how ultrashort bond ETFs fit into a diversified portfolio. Remember, past performance is not indicative of future results. This educational content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

ICSH vs PULS

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare ICSH and PULS, both ultrashort bond ETFs, to understand how they track their market. This page reviews their fees, holdings, dividends and expense ratios, noting that some data like index focus may not be available. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

ICSH

Metric

PULS

0.08%

Expense Ratio

0.15%

4.17%

Dividend Yield

4.42%

$8.89B

Net Assets

$19.27B

409

Holdings

1,028

Dec 11, 2013

Inception Date

Apr 5, 2018

–

Index Tracked

–

Ultrashort Bond

Fund Category

Ultrashort Bond

ICSH costs about $7.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

These funds do not share any of their top holdings.

Discover More Comparisons

ICSH vs VCSH

Compare ICSH and VCSH ETFs. Review 0.08% vs 0.03% expense ratios, 4.17% vs 4.53% yields, and holding data. Note: index tracking details are currently not avail.

ICSH vs JPST

Compare ICSH and JPST. Review expense ratios, net assets, yields and holdings. Learn how these ultra-short bond ETFs differ in cost and scale.

ICSH vs VUSB

Compare iShares (ICSH) and Vanguard (VUSB) ultra-short bond ETFs. Review expense ratios of 0.08% and 0.10%, yields, net assets, holdings and tracking data.

Investment Analysis

ICSH

Pros

Investors benefit from a low expense ratio of 0.08%, reducing the drag on overall returns.
With $8.9 billion in net assets, the fund demonstrates sufficient scale to support trading activity.
The inception date of December 2013 allows for a longer operational history compared to newer funds.

Considerations

A dividend yield of 4.17% is lower than the 4.42% offered by the comparable fund.
Detailed information on top holdings and sector weights is currently not available for assessment.
The specific index tracked by the fund is not available, limiting transparency regarding strategy.

PULS

Pros

The fund offers a higher dividend yield of 4.42%, providing potentially greater income distribution.
With $19.3 billion in net assets, the fund benefits from significant size and liquidity.
Detailed holdings data shows the top position, allowing for some assessment of portfolio composition.

Considerations

The expense ratio of 0.15% is higher than the 0.08% fee charged by the competitor.
Inception in April 2018 means the fund has a shorter operational history than older funds.
Sector weight breakdowns are not available, limiting the ability to assess concentration risks.

About ICSH and PULS

ICSH (ICSH)

The iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond ETF (ICSH) is designed for investors seeking current income with a focus on capital preservation. This fund actively manages a portfolio of ultra-short-term, investment-grade fixed-income securities. By targeting bonds with shorter maturities, the fund aims to reduce sensitivity to interest rate fluctuations, which can help minimise price volatility compared to longer-duration bond funds. As of the latest verified facts, the fund has net assets of USD 8.89 billion, reflecting its substantial size and liquidity. It holds 409 distinct securities and maintains a competitive expense ratio of 0.08%. With a dividend yield of 4.17%, it offers an attractive income stream for those looking to balance safety with yield. Since its inception in December 2013, the fund has established a track record of navigating various interest rate environments, making it a relevant option for conservative portfolios or cash-like alternatives.

PULS (PULS)

The PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF offers investors exposure to US dollar-denominated debt securities with short durations. This fund is designed to provide a potential source of income with lower interest rate sensitivity compared to longer-term bond portfolios. With a net asset value of USD 19.27 billion and a low expense ratio of 0.15%, it combines scale with cost efficiency. The fund holds approximately 1,028 distinct securities, diversifying risk across a broad range of issuers. While it currently displays a dividend yield of 4.42%, investors should remember that yields fluctuate and capital values can fall as well as rise. This ETF may appeal to those seeking a defensive position within fixed income, though it carries credit and interest rate risks inherent to the bond market.

Buy ICSH or PULS in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

ICSH vs PULS

Fund Snapshot