What defines an ultrashort duration bond ETF?

An ultrashort duration bond ETF invests in bonds with very short maturities, typically under one year. This strategy aims to reduce interest rate sensitivity compared to longer-term bond funds. Both ICSH and JPST fall into this category, seeking to provide income with lower volatility than traditional bond markets. Duration measures how sensitive a fund's price is to interest rate changes; shorter duration means less price fluctuation when rates move. These funds often hold high-quality corporate or government short-term debt, prioritising capital preservation and steady income over significant capital appreciation potential in rising or falling rate environments.

What does 'not available' mean for an ETF's index tracking?

When an ETF's index tracking is listed as 'not available', it means the public data does not disclose the specific benchmark index the fund uses. This limits transparency for investors wanting to know exactly how the fund is managed. For both ICSH and JPST, this information is not provided, preventing a direct comparison of their underlying methodologies. Investors cannot assess whether the funds track the same, similar, or entirely different indices. This opacity requires relying on the fund's overall category and performance history, rather than a specific benchmark comparison, to understand the investment strategy.

How does net asset value differ from expense ratio?

Net assets represent the total market value of all securities held by the fund, minus liabilities, often indicating size and liquidity. The expense ratio is an annual fee percentage deducted from the fund's assets to cover operating costs. For example, ICSH has $8.9 billion in net assets and a 0.08% expense ratio, while JPST has $41.7 billion in assets and a 0.18% expense ratio. Size influences trading ease, while fees affect long-term returns. Higher assets can offer better liquidity, whereas lower fees preserve more of the investment's gross yield over time.

How do the expense ratios of ICSH and JPST compare?

ICSH has an expense ratio of 0.08%, whereas JPST has an expense ratio of 0.18%. This represents a 0.10 percentage point difference annually. Expense ratios are deducted from fund returns, meaning a higher ratio reduces net investor yields. Over time, this 0.10% difference can compound, affecting total returns. ICSH's lower fee structure is more cost-efficient, while JPST's higher fee reflects different management costs or strategies. Both ratios are low compared to many active funds, but ICSH offers a cheaper entry point for similar ultrashort bond exposure, according to the provided fee data.

Do these funds distribute dividends, and how do yields compare?

Both funds distribute income, typically from interest earned on their bond holdings. ICSH reports a dividend yield of 4.17%, and JPST reports a dividend yield of 4.16%. These yields are nearly identical, indicating similar current income generation relative to share price. ETF dividends are usually paid monthly or quarterly, depending on the fund's policy. While yields appear comparable, actual distributions vary based on underlying portfolio performance and interest rates. Investors should note these yields are current snapshots and not guaranteed, as bond interest rates fluctuate with market conditions and monetary policy changes affecting short-term debt markets.

What do the top holdings data reveal about risk?

For both ICSH and JPST, detailed top holdings and sector weights are not available in the provided data. This absence limits the ability to assess specific issuer concentration risk, credit quality breakdown, or sector exposure directly. Without this information, investors cannot easily verify if either fund holds excessive debt from a single company or sector. It also prevents a direct comparison of the actual securities held. Consequently, risk assessment relies more heavily on the fund category, historical performance, and issuer reputation, rather than granular portfolio analysis, making it harder to distinguish between the two funds' underlying credit strategies.

How similar are the top-10 holdings of ICSH and JPST?

The provided data indicates that there are no shared top-10 holdings between ICSH and JPST. This suggests their underlying portfolios of short-term debt instruments are constructed differently, even though they fall into the same ultrashort bond category. This lack of overlap implies distinct approaches to selecting bonds, possibly reflecting different management styles or credit assessment criteria. While both aim for similar income and low duration, their actual asset composition varies significantly, as no common top holdings are listed among their available data. Investors should consider this as evidence of differentiated portfolio strategies.

How do inception dates affect fund track records?

ICSH was established in December 2013, providing a longer operational history, while JPST started in May 2017, offering a shorter track record. A longer history can show how a fund behaved through different economic cycles, including interest rate rises and falls. ICSH has data over three years longer than JPST. However, past performance does not guarantee future results. The shorter history of JPST means less data on its reaction to prolonged high-rate periods. Both funds have existed long enough to assess stability, but ICSH provides a more extended historical context for its management approach.

Why do both funds show different net asset levels?

JPST holds $41.7 billion in net assets, significantly more than ICSH's $8.9 billion. This difference reflects higher investor demand and adoption of JPST in the ultrashort bond market. Larger asset bases can improve liquidity, making it easier for large institutional investors to trade without moving the price. However, size does not necessarily correlate with better returns or lower risk. The disparity suggests different market penetration levels, with JPST being a more established presence in terms of capital gathered. Investors might perceive higher assets as a marker of trust or accessibility, influencing their choice based on liquidity needs.

What is the impact of the expense ratio difference over time?

The 0.10 percentage point difference between ICSH (0.08%) and JPST (0.18%) reduces net returns for JPST holders annually. On a $10,000 investment, ICSH would theoretically cost $8 per year, while JPST costs $18, assuming no other changes. Over ten years, ignoring compounding returns on the saved fee, this amounts to $100 more in costs for JPST. While the absolute amount may seem small per year, fees compound negatively over long periods. Lower expense ratios generally allow more of the fund's gross performance to remain with the investor, all else being equal.

How should beginners interpret the lack of sector weights?

The absence of sector weights for both ICSH and JPST means beginners cannot analyse their diversification across industries like financials, utilities, or government debt. This requires looking beyond the data, perhaps consulting issuer fact sheets for detailed portfolio composition. Without this, one must trust the fund's stated objective of low-duration credit. It highlights the importance of transparency in investment decisions. Beginners should recognise that this information gap prevents a direct comparison of how each fund allocates risk across different borrower types, making it harder to assess which fund might be more resilient to sector-specific economic downturns.

Which fund suits an investor prioritising low fees over high assets?

An investor prioritising minimal costs might find ICSH more appealing due to its 0.08% expense ratio versus JPST's 0.18%. While JPST offers larger liquidity with $41.7 billion in assets, ICSH provides similar dividend yields at a lower annual fee. This trade-off suggests that if direct trading is not required and cost efficiency is paramount, ICSH aligns better with that goal. Both are ultrashort bond funds with nearly identical yields, so the fee becomes a significant differentiator for long-term hold investors focused on reducing expense drag on returns.

ICSH vs JPST

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond ETF (ICSH) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST). Both are ultrashort bond funds with similar dividend yields, but JPST carries a higher expense ratio and significantly more net assets. While both share a market focus, their top holdings differ entirely, as neither fund's index tracking information is currently available. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

ICSH

Metric

JPST

0.08%

Expense Ratio

0.18%

4.17%

Dividend Yield

4.16%

$8.89B

Net Assets

$41.71B

409

Holdings

801

Dec 11, 2013

Inception Date

May 17, 2017

–

Index Tracked

–

Ultrashort Bond

Fund Category

Ultrashort Bond

ICSH costs about $10.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

These funds do not share any of their top holdings.

Discover More Comparisons

ICSH vs PULS

Compare ICSH and PULS on fees, dividends, holdings and tracking. Review net assets, expense ratios and yield data to assess these ultrashort bond ETFs.

ICSH vs VCSH

Compare ICSH and VCSH ETFs. Review 0.08% vs 0.03% expense ratios, 4.17% vs 4.53% yields, and holding data. Note: index tracking details are currently not avail.

ICSH vs VUSB

Compare iShares (ICSH) and Vanguard (VUSB) ultra-short bond ETFs. Review expense ratios of 0.08% and 0.10%, yields, net assets, holdings and tracking data.

Investment Analysis

ICSH

Pros

The fund offers a competitive expense ratio of 0.08% for its ultra-short duration bond strategy.
With a net asset value of $8.9 billion, the fund maintains sufficient liquidity for standard trading.
It provides a dividend yield of 4.17%, which is comparable to other short-term income options.

Considerations

No specific index tracking methodology is currently disclosed for this fund, limiting transparency.
Top holdings and sector weights are not available, making it difficult to assess concentration risks.
The inception date of December 2013 means it has a long operational history but less recent data.

JPST

Pros

The fund boasts substantial net assets of $41.7 billion, indicating high liquidity and market presence.
It offers a dividend yield of 4.16%, providing steady income for ultra-short duration investors.
Inception in May 2017 allows for a reasonable period of performance history to be assessed.

Considerations

The expense ratio of 0.18% is higher than some competing ultra-short duration bond ETFs.
Like the alternative, the specific index tracked is not listed, reducing clarity on strategy.
Detailed top holdings and sector weights are not available, hindering thorough risk analysis.

About ICSH and JPST

ICSH (ICSH)

The iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond ETF (ICSH) is designed for investors seeking current income with a focus on capital preservation. This fund actively manages a portfolio of ultra-short-term, investment-grade fixed-income securities. By targeting bonds with shorter maturities, the fund aims to reduce sensitivity to interest rate fluctuations, which can help minimise price volatility compared to longer-duration bond funds. As of the latest verified facts, the fund has net assets of USD 8.89 billion, reflecting its substantial size and liquidity. It holds 409 distinct securities and maintains a competitive expense ratio of 0.08%. With a dividend yield of 4.17%, it offers an attractive income stream for those looking to balance safety with yield. Since its inception in December 2013, the fund has established a track record of navigating various interest rate environments, making it a relevant option for conservative portfolios or cash-like alternatives.

JPST (JPST)

The JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST) is designed to provide investors with access to short-term fixed-income securities, aiming for consistent income with reduced volatility. As an exchange-traded fund (ETF), it pools money to buy a diversified portfolio of high-quality corporate and government bonds, typically with very short maturities. This structure helps mitigate interest rate risk compared to longer-duration bond funds, making it a popular choice for cash management or as a defensive allocation during uncertain economic periods. With a moderate expense ratio of 0.18%, JPST seeks to offer competitive yields, currently around 4.16%. However, investors should remember that bond prices can fall, and past performance is not a guarantee of future results. It is suitable for those looking for stability and income rather than high growth.

Buy ICSH or JPST in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

ICSH vs JPST

Fund Snapshot