What do the dividend yields mean?

HACK has a dividend yield of 0.05%, while IHAK has a yield of 0.07%. These figures represent annualized dividends relative to current share price. ETF dividends often reflect income generated by holdings after fund expenses, not necessarily distributions to investors. Yield is only a snapshot; dividends are not guaranteed and may vary based on underlying company payouts. Investors should note that yields for growth-focused tech funds tend to remain low and should never be used to infer overall performance or safety.

What does the index tracked mean for these funds?

Neither HACK nor IHAK has an available index tracked data. Knowing the index clarifies how the fund replicates its market exposure, including stock selection and weighting rules. Without this information, it is difficult to assess tracking accuracy or the fund's intended benchmark. When evaluating ETFs, look at index composition for insight into holdings overlap or potential biases. Absence of index data means investors rely on disclosed holdings and issuer documentation to understand portfolio construction.

How do top holdings compare between HACK and IHAK?

HACK and IHAK share five top-10 holdings: PANW, CRWD, OKTA, ZS and QLYS. However, HACK has higher allocations to PANW and CRWD, whereas IHAK gives greater weight to QLYS and OKTA. The remaining top-ten names differ, with HACK holding broader technology and cybersecurity names, while IHAK features more pure-play cyber firms. This overlap indicates thematic alignment, but the concentration and ordering of holdings can influence fund behavior and risk.

What is the expense ratio and why is it important?

The expense ratio is the annual fee expressed as a percentage of assets that a fund charges to cover operational costs. HACK has a 0.60% expense ratio, while IHAK's is 0.47%, making IHAK 0.13 percentage points cheaper per year. Lower fees can increase net returns over time. Always compare expense ratios alongside other factors like tracking accuracy, portfolio strategy and risk. A small difference can become significant over longer holding periods due to compounding.

Can I compare fees over multiple years?

Yes. If you hold HACK with a 0.60% expense ratio and IHAK at 0.47% for ten years, the cumulative fee impact differs: 6% for HACK and 4.7% for IHAK, assuming no changes in fund costs or investment amounts. This means that, all else being equal, a cheaper fund retains more of its assets for investment. Always review actual expense ratio disclosures for updates over time.

How should I interpret differences in net assets?

HACK manages $1.7 billion, while IHAK oversees $1.1 billion. Net assets measure a fund's size and can indicate investor adoption. Larger funds may offer greater liquidity and trading efficiency, but fund size does not guarantee performance or risk management. Investors should consider assets alongside expense ratios and holdings. It is important to remember that net assets can change over time due to market movements and investor flows.

What should I look for in ETF disclosures before comparing fees?

Before making a fee comparison, review the latest prospectus and factsheet for both HACK and IHAK. These documents confirm the current expense ratio, any fee waivers or changes, and how assets are managed. The most recent expense ratio and fee structure may differ from past figures. Always cross-check official sources and issuer disclosures to ensure that your comparison is based on accurate and up-to-date information.

How do ETFs track their market exposure?

ETFs use various methods to replicate index performance, such as physical holdings or derivatives. For HACK and IHAK, index tracking details are not available, so investors should rely on disclosed top holdings to infer market exposure. Tracking methods influence how closely an ETF follows its benchmark. It is important to understand the fund's strategy to assess how it might respond to market changes.

How do dividend yields impact ETF investors?

HACK's yield of 0.05% and IHAK's 0.07% are relatively low. These yields represent the estimated annual dividends relative to price, not total return. Distributions can vary based on holdings' payout policies and fund expenses. Investors should be aware that many tech ETFs focus on growth over income. Dividend yield is only one aspect to consider when evaluating potential cash distributions.

How do inception dates affect comparisons?

HACK was launched in November 2014, while IHAK began in June 2019. HACK's longer history provides more available data on fund behavior and market cycles, whereas IHAK is more recent. Inception date may influence investor confidence, but it is just one factor. Review both funds' strategies, holdings and management to form a complete picture.

What role do sector exposures play?

Sector weights for HACK and IHAK are not available, so investors should examine top holdings and issuer documentation for insights. Sector exposures determine concentration risk and potential impact from market cycles. Overlap in top holdings suggests similar thematic focus, but differences in sector and individual stock weights affect each fund's response to market events.

Why do top-10 holdings matter?

The top-10 holdings represent the largest allocations and often indicate the fund's market strategy and concentration. HACK's top ten include well-known cybersecurity and tech companies, such as PANW and CRWD, but IHAK features more pure-play cyber firms. Holding weights, like PANW at 6.30% in HACK versus 4.69% in IHAK, can affect performance and risk. Investors should review the entire portfolio for a full understanding of exposure.

HACK vs IHAK

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in October 2026.

Compare HACK (ISE Cyber Security ETF PureFunds) and IHAK (iShares Cybersecurity and Tech ETF). Review expense ratios of 0.60% versus 0.47%, net assets, dividend yields, top holdings and how each fund tracks its market. Educational content, not financial advice.

Compare HACK (ISE Cyber Security ETF PureFunds) and IHAK (iShares Cybersecurity and Tech ETF). Review expense ratios of 0.60% versus 0.47%, net assets, dividend yields, top holdings and how each fund ...

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

Metric

0.60%

Expense Ratio

0.47%

0.05%

Dividend Yield

0.07%

$1.73B

Net Assets

$1.15B

26

Holdings

50

Nov 11, 2014

Inception Date

Jun 11, 2019

–

Index Tracked

–

Technology

Fund Category

Technology

IHAK costs about $13.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Discover More Comparisons

HACK vs WCBR

Compare HACK and WCBR on expense ratios of 0.60% versus 0.45%, dividend yields, top holdings, and tracking methods to understand key differences.

CIBR vs IHAK

Compare CIBR and IHAK fees, holdings, dividends, and tracking. CIBR expenses are 0.58%, IHAK is 0.47%, with distinct yield and asset base differences.

BUG vs IHAK

Compare Global X Cybersecurity ETF (BUG) and iShares Cybersecurity and Tech ETF (IHAK) by examining fees, holdings, dividend yields and fund structures.

Investment Analysis

HACK

Pros

HACK has significantly larger net assets of $1.7 billion compared to its peer's $1.1 billion
The fund's 0.60% expense ratio reflects the cost of its established PureFunds management structure
HACK's portfolio includes diversified large-cap exposure through Broadcom and Cisco alongside security names

Considerations

Its 0.05% dividend yield offers minimal income generation for investors seeking regular cash distributions
The 0.60% expense ratio is notably higher than IHAK's 0.47% cost for a similar cyber theme
HACK's top-ten holdings represent only 53% of assets, indicating less concentrated exposure

IHAK

Pros

IHAK offers a lower 0.47% expense ratio, providing better cost efficiency for the cybersecurity theme
The fund maintains stronger sector purity with all top-ten holdings being pure-play cybersecurity names
Backed by iShares, IHAK benefits from a robust global issuer with extensive ETF infrastructure

Considerations

With $1.1 billion in net assets, IHAK is smaller than HACK's $1.7 billion fund size
The fund's 2019 inception is less established than HACK, which launched in November 2014
IHAK's 0.07% dividend yield remains very low for income-focused investors despite being slightly higher

Related Market Insights

Cybersecurity's Regulatory Reset: Why the SEC's SolarWinds Retreat Changes Everything

The SEC's SolarWinds retreat removes liability fears, unlocking corporate cybersecurity spending. Discover investment opportunities in leading firms like Palo Alto, CrowdStrike & Fortinet.