What are these ETFs? What do BUG and IHAK aim to provide?

BUG (Global X Fds Cybersecurity Etf) and IHAK (iShares Cybersecurity and Tech ETF) are exchange-traded funds that aim to provide exposure to companies involved in cybersecurity and technology. Both funds fall under the technology category, designed to reflect performance in the cybersecurity sector, which is experiencing structural growth due to increasing global digital threats and regulatory mandates.

How do I interpret fund expense ratios?

An ETF's expense ratio is the annual fee expressed as a percentage of your investment. BUG has an expense ratio of 0.50%, while IHAK's is lower at 0.47%. This difference of 0.03 percentage points means that over time, the fees charged could impact your investment returns, with IHAK potentially yielding better net returns compared to higher-fee alternatives.

What is a dividend yield and how does it apply to BUG and IHAK?

A dividend yield shows how much income a fund generates relative to its share price. BUG and IHAK have very low yields of 0.03% and 0.07%, respectively, indicating that neither is suitable for income-focused investors. Instead, investors in these ETFs rely almost exclusively on capital appreciation.

Which fund offers a better track record?

BUG has been established since October 25, 2019, offering a longer track record compared to IHAK, which started on June 11, 2019. This can allow investors to assess longer-term performance and volatility relative to the broader technology sector. However, IHAK is managed by iShares, known for its strong reputation and effective tracking, enhancing investor confidence in the product's integrity.

What kind of holdings do BUG and IHAK have?

Both BUG and IHAK hold a diverse range of cybersecurity and tech companies. BUG focuses more on pure-play firms like OKTA (9.03%) and CRWD (7.77%). IHAK also holds these companies but provides broader exposure to established tech leaders involved in security, such as S (4.95%). They share several top-10 holdings, including OKTA, CRWD, PANW, QLYS, ZS, VRNS, and NTSK.

What are the top risks of investing in cybersecurity ETFs?

Cybersecurity ETFs like BUG and IHAK may exhibit higher volatility and drawdowns compared to broader market indices, especially during risk-off market conditions. The investment concentration in high-growth cybersecurity firms introduces significant risk, as they lack diversification into more stable technology sub-sectors. Minimal dividend yields also mean investors depend mostly on capital appreciation.

Which fund offers better liquidity?

With $1.9 billion in net assets, BUG offers better liquidity compared to IHAK, which has $1.1 billion in net assets. This can facilitate easier trading and reduce the risk of wide bid-ask spreads, particularly during periods of market stress.

How do market trends impact BUG and IHAK?

Both BUG and IHAK provide exposure to the cybersecurity sector, which is experiencing structural growth driven by increasing global digital threats and regulatory mandates. This trend can positively impact these ETFs' performance. However, market volatility can still affect their value, particularly if investors seek safer investments.

What does the sector weight tell us about BUG and IHAK?

The specific sector weights for both BUG and IHAK are not available in our data. However, both are categorised under the technology sector, focusing primarily on cybersecurity. The lack of diversification into other sectors means they may behave more similarly to pure tech investments than to a broader index.

Is BUG or IHAK better for beginners?

Both funds are relatively new and have low dividend yields, making them suitable for investors focused on capital appreciation rather than income generation. Beginners should consider the fee structure (BUG: 0.50%, IHAK: 0.47%) and liquidity (BUG: $1.9B, IHAK: $1.1B), keeping in mind their high-growth, high-volatility nature.

How do I compare BUG and IHAK using this page?

Use this page to compare the key metrics of BUG and IHAK, including expense ratios, net assets, dividend yields, inception dates, and top holdings. Remember, this is educational content, not financial advice. Ensure you understand how these figures affect investment returns and consider your own investment goals before choosing.

BUG vs IHAK

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare Global X Fds Cybersecurity Etf (BUG) and iShares Cybersecurity and Tech ETF (IHAK). This page examines fees, holdings, dividends and how each fund tracks its market, providing an educational overview of these technology-focused ETFs for investors. Educational content, not financial advice.

Compare Global X Fds Cybersecurity Etf (BUG) and iShares Cybersecurity and Tech ETF (IHAK). This page examines fees, holdings, dividends and how each fund tracks its market, providing an educational o...

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

BUG

Metric

IHAK

0.50%

Expense Ratio

0.47%

0.03%

Dividend Yield

0.07%

$1.87B

Net Assets

$1.15B

34

Holdings

50

Oct 25, 2019

Inception Date

Jun 11, 2019

–

Index Tracked

–

Technology

Fund Category

Technology

IHAK costs about $3.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	BUG	IHAK
OKTAOkta, Inc.	9.03%	5.39%
CRWDCrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.	7.77%	4.97%
PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc.	7.39%	4.69%
QLYSQualys, Inc.	5.50%	5.58%
ZSZscaler, Inc.	5.50%	5.29%
VRNSVaronis Systems, Inc.	4.94%	5.10%
NTSKNetskope, Inc.	4.80%	5.53%

Discover More Comparisons

BUG vs HACK

Compare BUG and HACK cybersecurity ETFs. Review expense ratios, assets, dividends and holdings to assess fee and portfolio differences between these funds.

BUG vs CIBR

Compare BUG and CIBR cybersecurity ETFs. Review expense ratios, net assets, dividend yields and top holdings to assess tracking differences and suitability.

BUG vs WCBR

Compare BUG and WCBR cybersecurity ETFs. Review expense ratios, net assets, dividend yields, top holdings and index tracking to assess suitability.

Investment Analysis

BUG

Pros

This ETF provides targeted exposure to the cybersecurity sector, which is experiencing structural growth driven by increasing global digital threats and regulatory mandates.
With $1.9 billion in net assets, it offers better liquidity compared to its smaller peers, facilitating easier trading and reduced risk of wide bid-ask spreads.
Its established track record since October 2019 allows investors to assess its long-term performance and volatility relative to the broader technology sector.

Considerations

The 0.50% expense ratio is relatively high for an exchange-traded fund, which may erode long-term returns for buy-and-hold investors seeking low-cost exposure.
Investment concentration in high-growth cybersecurity firms introduces significant volatility, as the fund lacks diversification into more stable or defensive technology sub-sectors.
A dividend yield of just 0.03% means investors rely almost exclusively on capital appreciation, offering minimal income generation within a total return strategy.

IHAK

Pros

The fund is managed by iShares, an issuer with a strong reputation for operational reliability and effective tracking, enhancing investor confidence in the product's integrity.
Its lower expense ratio of 0.47% represents a cost-effective way to access cybersecurity markets, potentially yielding better net returns compared to higher-fee alternatives.
IHAK provides exposure to a diverse range of cybersecurity and technology companies, capturing both pure-play firms and established tech leaders involved in security.

Considerations

With $1.1 billion in net assets, the fund is smaller than its main competitor, which might result in slightly less liquidity during periods of market stress.
The sector's growth-oriented nature means it may exhibit higher volatility and drawdowns compared to broader market indices, particularly during risk-off market conditions.
Similar to peers, the minimal dividend yield of 0.07% indicates the fund is not suitable for income-focused investors, prioritising capital growth over payouts.

Related Market Insights

Cybersecurity's Regulatory Reset: Why the SEC's SolarWinds Retreat Changes Everything

The SEC's SolarWinds retreat removes liability fears, unlocking corporate cybersecurity spending. Discover investment opportunities in leading firms like Palo Alto, CrowdStrike & Fortinet.