What does '0DTE' mean in the context of these ETFs, specifically QDTE?

'0DTE' stands for zero days to expiration. It refers to options contracts that expire on the same day they are traded. QDTE uses this strategy to generate frequent income through premiums. This differs from traditional covered calls which typically have longer expirations. The aim is to capture rapid premium decay. This approach requires precise execution and can influence the volatility of income streams compared to standard options strategies used in derivative income funds.

How do derivative income ETFs differ from standard index-tracking ETFs?

Standard index ETFs simply hold securities to match an index's performance. Derivative income ETFs, like GPIQ and QDTE, actively use options strategies, such as covered calls, to generate additional income from premiums. This can boost yield but may cap upside participation during strong rallies. They track an underlying index like the Nasdaq-100 but their primary objective includes distributing this premium income to shareholders, creating a distinct risk-return profile compared to passive replication.

What is the significance of the 'premium income' label for GPIQ?

The term 'premium income' indicates that the fund generates returns partly by selling options, such as covered calls. This collects premiums from buyers of those options. For GPIQ, this strategy aims to complement dividends and capital appreciation from the underlying Nasdaq-100 constituents. The goal is to provide enhanced current income. This label distinguishes it from funds that rely solely on dividends or buy-and-hold equity appreciation for returns.

How do the expense ratios of GPIQ and QDTE compare?

GPIQ has an expense ratio of 0.29%, whereas QDTE charges 0.96%. This is a difference of 0.67 percentage points. Lower fees generally mean more of the fund's gross return is retained by investors, assuming similar performance. Over extended periods, even small percentage point differences can compound, potentially creating a notable gap in net accumulated wealth. Investors should consider this cost differential when evaluating the long-term impact on net returns for comparable strategies.

What do the dividend yields of 9.82% and 43.71% indicate?

These yields represent the annualised distribution rate based on recent payouts and current price. GPIQ yields 9.82%, while QDTE yields 43.71%. High yields like QDTE's often reflect aggressive option-selling income but do not guarantee total return, as the underlying share price can fluctuate or decline. Yields can also vary monthly. Investors should note that distributions may include return of capital if income is insufficient, so a high yield alone does not indicate fund profitability.

How similar are the top holdings of GPIQ and QDTE?

Based on available data, there are no shared top-10 holdings between GPIQ and QDTE. GPIQ lists major tech stocks like NVDA (8.52%) and AAPL (7.91%) as top positions. QDTE lists 'WEEK' at 4.96%. This lack of overlap suggests different implementation strategies or portfolio compositions despite both targeting Nasdaq-100 income. It highlights that similar thematic exposures can be constructed via very different holding patterns or derivative structures, affecting how each fund participates in market movements.

What is the impact of GPIQ's concentration in NVDA and AAPL?

GPIQ's top holdings include NVDA at 8.52% and AAPL at 7.91%. High concentration in single stocks means the fund's performance and income capacity are significantly influenced by these companies' stock price movements and volatility. If these stocks underperform, the fund may lag. Conversely, their strength can boost returns. This contrasts with a more diversified approach, meaning investors carry more single-stock risk within this Nasdaq-100 derivative income product.

How do net assets affect liquidity for GPIQ and QDTE?

GPIQ has $5.8 billion in net assets, while QDTE has $967 million. Larger asset bases generally support higher trading volume and tighter bid-ask spreads, facilitating easier entry and exit for investors. GPIQ's significantly larger size may offer better liquidity for large transactions. QDTE, while substantial, might exhibit wider spreads during volatile periods. Net assets are not a guarantee of performance but are a practical consideration for transaction costs and liquidity management in ETF trading.

How does the recent inception date affect interpreting these funds?

GPIQ launched in October 2023, and QDTE in March 2024. Both have very short track records. This limits the ability to assess performance across different market cycles, such as prolonged bull or bear phases. Historical yields may not repeat, and strategy sustainability is unproven. Investors should be cautious comparing current metrics like yield to long-term expectations, as the sample size of trading days is small, potentially skewing performance data during volatile or favourable early conditions.

Why is 'not available' index tracking significant for comparison?

For both GPIQ and QDTE, the specific index tracked is listed as 'not available'. This creates uncertainty about their exact benchmarking methodology. Without knowing the precise index, it is difficult to evaluate tracking error or assess how closely they mirror the intended Nasdaq-100 exposure. It complicates direct comparison with standard index funds. Investors must rely on stated holdings and yield data rather than a clear benchmark reference, potentially making it harder to judge relative market capture.

What does QDTE's high expense ratio imply for net returns?

QDTE's expense ratio is 0.96%, which is considerably higher than GPIQ's 0.29% and many traditional ETFs. Higher fees directly reduce the net return paid to investors over time. While QDTE's 43.71% yield is high, the significant cost drag means a larger portion of gross income is consumed by fees. Investors should evaluate whether the active 0DTE strategy's potential income generation justifies the higher cost, especially compared to lower-fee alternative income strategies.

GPIQ vs QDTE

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare GPIQ and QDTE, two Nasdaq-100 derivative income ETFs. This page contrasts their 0.29% and 0.96% expense ratios, dividend yields of 9.82% and 43.71%, and distinct holdings. See how each fund generates income and tracks the market, with net assets of $5.8 billion and $967 million respectively. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

GPIQ

Metric

QDTE

0.29%

Expense Ratio

0.96%

9.82%

Dividend Yield

43.71%

$5.84B

Net Assets

$967.30M

107

Holdings

Oct 24, 2023

Inception Date

Mar 7, 2024

–

Index Tracked

–

Derivative Income

Fund Category

Derivative Income

GPIQ costs about $67.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

These funds do not share any of their top holdings.

Discover More Comparisons

GPIQ vs QYLD

Compare GPIQ and QYLD on fees, holdings, dividends and market tracking. Examine differences in expense ratios and yields between these Nasdaq 100 income ETFs.

GPIQ vs QQQI

Compare GPIQ vs QQQI on fees, dividends, and holdings. Review expense ratios, net assets, and Nasdaq-100 exposure to understand key differences between the two.

GPIQ vs QDVO

Compare GPIQ and QDVO on fees, holdings, dividends and index tracking. View expense ratios, yields and key differences in these derivative income ETFs.

Investment Analysis

GPIQ

Pros

GPIQ offers a high dividend yield of 9.82%, appealing to investors seeking significant income generation.
Its expense ratio is competitive at 0.29%, keeping investment costs relatively low.
The fund holds substantial net assets of $5.8 billion, indicating strong market confidence and liquidity.

Considerations

Inception in October 2023 means limited historical performance data for long-term analysis.
The specific index tracked is not available, creating uncertainty regarding its benchmarking methodology.
Heavy concentration in top holdings like NVDA and AAPL may increase single-stock risk.

QDTE

Pros

QDTE delivers an exceptionally high dividend yield of 43.71%, ideal for aggressive income strategies.
Its focus on 0DTE options potentially allows for more dynamic income generation compared to traditional methods.
Despite its recent inception, it has attracted significant assets of $967 million, showing rapid adoption.

Considerations

The expense ratio of 0.96% is considerably higher than many comparable ETFs, reducing net returns.
Limited track record since March 2024 raises concerns about the sustainability and consistency of its high yields.
Top holdings data is sparse, with only 'WEEK' listed, suggesting opacity in its investment portfolio.

About GPIQ and QDTE

GPIQ (GPIQ)

The Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF is designed for investors interested in exposure to technology and growth sectors while seeking potential income. This fund tracks the Nasdaq-100, a broad index of non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market. The ETF primarily uses a covered call strategy, selling options on a basket of Nasdaq-100 stocks to generate income. While this approach can provide steady distributions, it may limit capital appreciation in periods of strong market growth. Investors should be aware that derivative strategies introduce unique risks, including option volatility. This fund is part of Goldman Sachs Asset Management's broader range of ETFs focused on income generation. It is suitable for those who understand option mechanics and are seeking yield alongside technology sector exposure.

QDTE (QDTE)

The Roundhill Nasdaq-100 0DTE Covered Call ETF (QDTE) is an exchange-traded fund designed to generate income through options strategies linked to the Nasdaq-100 index. By focusing on zero-days-to-expiration (0DTE) covered calls, the fund aims to capture premium from short-term volatility while maintaining exposure to large-cap technology companies. With a net asset value of approximately USD 967 million and an inception date of March 7, 2024, QDTE is a relatively new addition to the derivative income category. It holds five primary positions, reflecting its concentrated strategy. Investors should note the expense ratio of 0.96% and be aware that while the dividend yield is high, it comes with specific risks associated with options trading and market volatility. As with all investments, capital is at risk, and past performance does not guarantee future results.

Buy GPIQ or QDTE in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

GPIQ vs QDTE

Fund Snapshot