What does the term 'covered call' mean in the context of these ETFs?

A covered call strategy involves holding the underlying assets, such as stocks in the Nasdaq-100, while selling call options on those same assets. The option seller receives a premium, which can generate income. However, this strategy often caps the potential upside of the stock portfolio because if the stock price rises significantly, the investor may have to sell the shares at the strike price, missing out on further gains. Both GPIQ and QYLD utilise elements of this derivative income approach.

Why do these funds have a 'Derivative Income' category classification?

These funds are classified under 'Derivative Income' because their primary objective is to generate current income for investors rather than solely focusing on long-term capital appreciation. They achieve this by using financial derivatives, specifically options, to create additional cash flow. This differs from traditional growth equity ETFs that might reinvest dividends or focus purely on stock price increases. The income is typically distributed to shareholders, although the method and regularity can vary.

What does 'inception date' tell an investor about an ETF?

The inception date marks when an ETF was first launched and began trading on the market. For QYLD, this date is 12 Dec 2013, while for GPIQ it is 24 Oct 2023. An older inception date like QYLD's allows for a longer performance history, which some investors use to assess how the fund has behaved during different market cycles. A newer fund like GPIQ has less historical data available for such analysis.

How do the expense ratios of GPIQ and QYLD compare?

GPIQ has an expense ratio of 0.29%, whereas QYLD has an expense ratio of 0.60%. This means GPIQ is 0.31 percentage points cheaper to own annually. Lower expenses generally mean more of the fund's returns are retained by the investor, all else being equal. While 0.31% might seem small, over long investment horizons, fee differences can compound and influence the net value received by shareholders.

What are the dividend yields for GPIQ and QYLD, and what do they signify?

Based on the provided data, GPIQ offers a dividend yield of 9.82%, while QYLD offers 11.50%. These yields represent the annual income generated by the fund relative to its share price. A higher yield like QYLD's suggests more immediate income distribution, but it doesn't necessarily mean better performance. Investors should consider that high yields may come with risks, such as potential reduction in capital growth or higher portfolio volatility.

How do the net assets of these ETFs differ?

GPIQ has net assets of $5.8 billion, while QYLD is larger at $8.5 billion. Larger asset bases often contribute to better liquidity, which can facilitate easier buying and selling without significantly affecting the share price. However, a very large fund might also face challenges in deploying capital efficiently. Both funds hold substantial assets, indicating significant investor interest and market presence, but QYLD currently manages a larger portion of capital.

Which investing goal is typically associated with high-yield ETFs like GPIQ and QYLD?

High-yield ETFs are often associated with investors seeking regular income streams, such as those in retirement or planning for ongoing cash flow needs. They might also appeal to those willing to trade potential capital appreciation for higher current distributions. These funds generally focus on generating cash via premiums from options writing. Investors prioritising long-term growth might find these structures less suitable compared to plain vanilla equity ETFs.

How similar are the top holdings between GPIQ and QYLD?

The top holdings are highly similar. Both funds list NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, MU, AMZN, AMD, GOOGL, META, and TSLA among their top positions. For instance, GPIQ holds NVDA at 8.52% and AAPL at 7.91%, while QYLD holds NVDA at 8.54% and AAPL at 7.82%. This strong overlap suggests that both funds provide very similar exposure to the large-cap technology sector components of the Nasdaq-100, despite differences in their covered call strategies or expense structures.

What index do these ETFs track, and is information available?

According to the provided fund data, the specific index tracked by either GPIQ or QYLD is listed as 'not available'. While both are generally associated with the Nasdaq-100 given their holdings, exact index details aren't provided in the source. Investors often look at index composition to understand diversification and methodology, but without this detail, one must rely on the disclosed top holdings and sector weights, which are also marked as 'not available' here.

How does the technology sector concentration affect these funds?

Both funds exhibit high concentration in large-cap tech stocks, as evidenced by top holdings like NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT. This means their performance is heavily tied to the tech sector. If tech stocks underperform, both funds could suffer despite their income strategies. While concentration can boost returns during tech rallies, it increases risk if the sector faces headwinds. Investors should assess their comfort with sector-specific volatility before comparing these income-focused products.

How do ETF dividends actually work for investors?

When an ETF receives dividends from its underlying holdings or generates income from options premiums, it accumulates this cash. Periodically, the ETF distributes this income to shareholders, typically monthly or quarterly. The distribution amount varies based on the fund's performance and strategy. For GPIQ and QYLD, the stated dividend yields represent the recent distribution rate. Investors receive cash payments, though some brokers allow automatic reinvestment of these distributions to purchase additional shares.

Does a longer track record guarantee better future results for QYLD vs GPIQ?

No. QYLD has a longer track record starting 12 Dec 2013 compared to GPIQ's 24 Oct 2023 inception. A longer history allows for observing performance across different market conditions, but it does not predict future results. Market dynamics, interest rates, and option volatility change. GPIQ's newer status means less historical data, which some might view as a risk, but its strategy could adapt to current conditions differently. Past performance is never a guarantee of future outcomes.

GPIQ vs QYLD

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

GPIQ vs QYLD. Compare Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF fees, holdings, dividends, and market tracking. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

GPIQ

Metric

QYLD

0.29%

Expense Ratio

0.60%

9.82%

Dividend Yield

11.50%

$5.84B

Net Assets

$8.48B

107

Holdings

104

Oct 24, 2023

Inception Date

Dec 12, 2013

–

Index Tracked

–

Derivative Income

Fund Category

Derivative Income

GPIQ costs about $31.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	GPIQ	QYLD
NVDANVIDIA Corporation	8.52%	8.54%
AAPLApple Inc.	7.91%	7.82%
MSFTMicrosoft Corporation	5.80%	5.84%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.	4.84%	5.05%
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.	4.35%	4.36%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc.	4.01%	4.02%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc.	3.90%	3.27%
METAMeta Platforms, Inc.	3.28%	3.15%
TSLATesla, Inc.	2.66%	3.05%

Discover More Comparisons

GPIQ vs QQQI

Compare GPIQ vs QQQI on fees, dividends, and holdings. Review expense ratios, net assets, and Nasdaq-100 exposure to understand key differences between the two.

GPIQ vs QDVO

Compare GPIQ and QDVO on fees, holdings, dividends and index tracking. View expense ratios, yields and key differences in these derivative income ETFs.

GPIQ vs GPIX

Compare Goldman Sachs GPIQ and GPIX income ETFs. Review 0.29% fees, 9.82% vs 8.07% yields, and top holdings. Assess tracking and performance neutrally.

Investment Analysis

GPIQ

Pros

Lower expense ratio of 0.29% compared to QYLD
Substantial assets of $5.8 billion indicate strong liquidity
High dividend yield of 9.82% provides significant income

Considerations

Short track record since Oct 24, 2023 inception
Tracked index information is not available
High concentration in large-cap tech stocks

QYLD

Pros

Longer track record since Dec 12, 2013 inception
Higher dividend yield of 11.50% offers greater income
Robust assets of $8.5 billion ensure market liquidity

Considerations

Higher expense ratio of 0.60% increases costs
Tracked index information is not available
Significant concentration in the same top holdings as GPIQ

About GPIQ and QYLD

GPIQ (GPIQ)

The Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF is designed for investors interested in exposure to technology and growth sectors while seeking potential income. This fund tracks the Nasdaq-100, a broad index of non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market. The ETF primarily uses a covered call strategy, selling options on a basket of Nasdaq-100 stocks to generate income. While this approach can provide steady distributions, it may limit capital appreciation in periods of strong market growth. Investors should be aware that derivative strategies introduce unique risks, including option volatility. This fund is part of Goldman Sachs Asset Management's broader range of ETFs focused on income generation. It is suitable for those who understand option mechanics and are seeking yield alongside technology sector exposure.

QYLD (QYLD)

The Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) is a derivative income fund designed to generate regular distributions for investors. Rather than simply tracking the price of the Nasdaq 100, it employs a covered call strategy, holding the underlying index components while selling monthly call options against them. This approach aims to capture premium income, which is reflected in its current dividend yield of 11.50%. The fund holds 104 holdings and carries an expense ratio of 0.60%. While the strategy can provide attractive income, it may limit capital appreciation potential during strong market rallies, as gains are often capped by the sold options. Investors should note that values can fall as well as rise, and income distributions are not guaranteed.

Buy GPIQ or QYLD in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

GPIQ vs QYLD

Fund Snapshot