What are expense ratios and how do they differ between GOEX and RING?

An expense ratio is the annual fee charged by a fund to cover management and operating costs, deducted directly from its assets. It affects net returns because lower fees leave more capital invested. GOEX charges 0.65%, while RING charges 0.39%. This 0.26 percentage point difference means RING's fees are lower. Over long holding periods, even small fee differences can accumulate into noticeable variances in final investment outcomes due to compounding.

Why is net assets important when comparing ETFs like GOEX and RING?

Net assets indicate a fund's total market value, providing a proxy for its size and potential liquidity. Larger funds often benefit from economies of scale, which can help contain costs. GOEX has net assets of $131 million, whereas RING has $2.5 billion. This makes RING significantly larger in size. Fund size can sometimes influence how easily shares are traded, as larger funds often have more active market participation.

How does dividend yield differ between the two gold-focused ETFs?

Dividend yield measures the annual income a fund pays out relative to its share price. It reflects income distribution, not capital appreciation. GOEX has a dividend yield of 1.99%, while RING's yield is 1.08%. This indicates that GOEX currently pays out a larger proportion of its value as income compared to RING. These yields can fluctuate based on the dividends paid by the companies held within each fund.

Do these ETFs track the same index or benchmark?

Fund tracking details are not available for GOEX or RING. Index tracking determines the specific companies and weightings a fund replicates. Without this data, we cannot compare their underlying indices directly. Both fall under the Equity Precious Metals category, but their specific methodologies and benchmark composition are not disclosed. This means the exact stocks they hold might differ beyond the top holdings listed.

Which fund has a longer operational history and why does it matter?

A longer operational history provides more data on how a fund has managed costs and tracked its goals over different market conditions. GOEX's inception date is November 3, 2010, while RING started on January 31, 2012. GOEX therefore has a longer track record. This additional operational time allows investors to see how it handled various economic periods, although past performance never guarantees future results.

How do the top holdings and diversification compare for GOEX and RING?

The top holdings reveal key exposure. GOEX's largest holding is HL at 4.96%, followed by CDE at 4.13%. RING has a much larger position in NEM at 16.37%, alongside CDE at 3.38%. This suggests RING's portfolio construction is more concentrated in its single largest holding compared to GOEX's more balanced distribution across its top two stocks.

What goal is each fund often associated with for an investor?

Investors looking for higher income might compare their respective yields. GOEX offers a 1.99% dividend yield, while RING provides 1.08%. However, the primary focus of these funds is typically capital appreciation from gold mining exposure, not income. Income generation from these yields is often secondary to the fund's overall price movement, which is tied to the precious metals sector.

How is ETF income typically distributed to investors?

ETFs generally pay out dividends they receive from their underlying holdings to investors, often on a regular schedule. The exact frequency and amount depend on the companies within the fund. Both GOEX and RING distribute income; the reported figures show yields of 1.99% and 1.08% respectively. Distributions vary over time based on corporate dividend policies and fund expenses.

What are the primary ways these two funds differ?

These funds differ in structure and cost. GOEX is smaller ($131M net assets) with a higher fee (0.65%) and a slightly higher yield (1.99%). RING is significantly larger ($2.5B net assets) with a lower expense ratio (0.39%). Their portfolios also diverge: while both hold CDE, RING is heavily concentrated in NEM (16.37%) whereas GOEX holds HL (4.96%) and CDE (4.13%) at similar weightings.

GOEX vs RING

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in October 2026.

Compare Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). This page reviews fees, holdings, dividends, and how each fund tracks the gold market. GOEX charges 0.65% with a 1.99% yield; RING costs 0.39% with a 1.08% yield. Both share CDE among top holdings. Educational content, not financial advice.

Compare Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). This page reviews fees, holdings, dividends, and how each fund tracks the gold market. GOEX charges 0.65% wit...

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

GOEX

Metric

RING

0.65%

Expense Ratio

0.39%

1.99%

Dividend Yield

1.08%

$131.06M

Net Assets

$2.50B

55

Holdings

52

Nov 3, 2010

Inception Date

Jan 31, 2012

–

Index Tracked

–

Equity Precious Metals

Fund Category

Equity Precious Metals

RING costs about $26.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	GOEX	RING
CDECoeur Mining, Inc.	4.13%	3.38%

Discover More Comparisons

GDX vs RING

Compare GDX and RING ETFs. Review expenses, assets, dividends, holdings, and tracking details to understand key differences between these gold miners.

Investment Analysis

GOEX

Pros

GOEX's higher 1.99% dividend yield offers greater income potential for gold explorer investors.
Inception in 2010 provides a longer performance track record than RING.
The fund has an inception date of 3 November 2010.

Considerations

GOEX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than the 0.39% charged by RING.
With $131 million in net assets, GOEX is significantly smaller than RING's $2.5 billion.
GOEX's top holding HL at 4.96% represents a less diversified concentration than RING's 16.37% in NEM.

RING

Pros

RING has a lower expense ratio of 0.39% compared to GOEX's 0.65%.
RING's $2.5 billion net assets suggest greater liquidity and trading volume.
RING's inception date of 31 January 2012 provides a substantial track record.

Considerations

RING's 1.08% dividend yield is lower than GOEX's 1.99%.
A high 16.37% weight in top holding NEM creates significant concentration risk.
RING's top 10 holdings share only CDE with GOEX, indicating different portfolio construction.

Related Market Insights

The New Gold Rush: Fed Probe Sparks Flight to Safety

A criminal probe into the Fed Chair has sent gold prices soaring to record highs. Discover how Nemo's Gold Rush Neme helps investors gain exposure to this ultimate safe haven asset.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

13 January 2026

Read Insight

Related Market Insights

The New Gold Rush: Fed Probe Sparks Flight to Safety

A criminal probe into the Fed Chair has sent gold prices soaring to record highs. Discover how Nemo's Gold Rush Neme helps investors gain exposure to this ultimate safe haven asset.

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

13 January 2026

Read Insight

About GOEX and RING

GOEX (GOEX)

RING (RING)

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Gold Rush: Could Fed Probe Drive Safe Haven Demand?

An unprecedented criminal probe into the Federal Reserve Chair has sparked a flight to safety, driving gold prices to record highs. This theme focuses on gold miners and related companies that stand to benefit from sustained demand for this safe-haven asset.

Published: 13 January 2026

Explore Basket

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Gold Rush: Could Fed Probe Drive Safe Haven Demand?

An unprecedented criminal probe into the Federal Reserve Chair has sparked a flight to safety, driving gold prices to record highs. This theme focuses on gold miners and related companies that stand to benefit from sustained demand for this safe-haven asset.

Published: 13 January 2026

Explore Basket

GOEX vs RING

Fund Snapshot

Discover More Comparisons

GDX vs RING

Investment Analysis

GOEX

Pros

Considerations

RING

Pros

Considerations

Related Market Insights

The New Gold Rush: Fed Probe Sparks Flight to Safety

Related Market Insights

The New Gold Rush: Fed Probe Sparks Flight to Safety

About GOEX and RING

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Gold Rush: Could Fed Probe Drive Safe Haven Demand?

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Gold Rush: Could Fed Probe Drive Safe Haven Demand?

Buy GOEX or RING in Nemo

Zero Commission

Trusted & Regulated

6% Interest on Cash

Frequently asked questions

Fund Snapshot

Discover More Comparisons

GDX vs RING

About GOEX and RING

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Gold Rush: Could Fed Probe Drive Safe Haven Demand?

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Gold Rush: Could Fed Probe Drive Safe Haven Demand?

Related Market Insights

The New Gold Rush: Fed Probe Sparks Flight to Safety

Related Market Insights

The New Gold Rush: Fed Probe Sparks Flight to Safety