

GLD vs SGOL
Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.
GLD and SGOL both hold physical gold bullion and track the LBMA Gold Price, but GLD charges a 0.40% expense ratio while SGOL charges 0.17%, a gap of about $23 a year per $10,000. GLD suits investors who value the largest and most traded gold trust at $147.75 billion, and SGOL suits long-term holders who want the same metal exposure at a lower ongoing cost. Educational content, not financial advice.
GLD and SGOL both hold physical gold bullion and track the LBMA Gold Price, but GLD charges a 0.40% expense ratio while SGOL charges 0.17%, a gap of about $23 a year per $10,000. GLD suits investors w...
Why It’s Moving

Gold ETF GLD Faces Pressure as Hawkish Fed Signals and Strong Dollar Test Critical Support
- Hawkish monetary policy expectations and a rally in the U.S. dollar drove spot gold below $4,300 an ounce, directly impacting GLD's performance as investors repriced rate hike bets.
- Stronger-than-expected September flash S&P Composite PMI data at 58.4 signaled robust services sector activity, reducing immediate safe-haven demand and pressuring precious metals.
- Despite near-term volatility, institutional forecasts highlight limited downside risk with TD Securities projecting a move above $5,000 and Goldman Sachs citing undisclosed sovereign buying, particularly from China, as a key long-term driver.

Gold ETF GLD Faces Pressure as Hawkish Fed Signals and Strong Dollar Test Critical Support
- Hawkish monetary policy expectations and a rally in the U.S. dollar drove spot gold below $4,300 an ounce, directly impacting GLD's performance as investors repriced rate hike bets.
- Stronger-than-expected September flash S&P Composite PMI data at 58.4 signaled robust services sector activity, reducing immediate safe-haven demand and pressuring precious metals.
- Despite near-term volatility, institutional forecasts highlight limited downside risk with TD Securities projecting a move above $5,000 and Goldman Sachs citing undisclosed sovereign buying, particularly from China, as a key long-term driver.
Investment Analysis

GLD
GLD
Pros
- Largest gold trust of the pair at about $147.75 billion in net assets
- Trading since November 2004, the longest record among US gold ETFs
- Very high trading volume, which helps large or frequent traders
Considerations
- Higher 0.40% expense ratio, more than double SGOL's 0.17%
- Costs about $40 a year per $10,000 versus $17 for SGOL
- Fee drag compounds over long holding periods for buy-and-hold investors

SGOL
SGOL
Pros
- Lower 0.17% expense ratio, about $23 cheaper per $10,000 each year
- Tracks the same LBMA Gold Price with allocated physical bullion
- Established fund with about $7.43 billion in assets since 2009
Considerations
- Much smaller than GLD, at roughly one twentieth of its asset base
- Lower trading volume can mean slightly wider spreads on large orders
- Pays no dividend, like every physical gold trust
Buy GLD or SGOL in Nemo
Zero Commission
Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.
Trusted & Regulated
Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.
6% Interest on Cash
Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

