What does the expense ratio represent in an ETF?

The expense ratio is the annual fee charged by a fund to manage its operations, expressed as a percentage of assets. It covers management costs, administration, and other expenses. A lower expense ratio generally means less drag on investment returns over time. Investors should compare these fees when evaluating similar funds, as even small differences can accumulate significantly in terms of cost over long holding periods.

What is dividend yield for a bond ETF?

Dividend yield for a bond ETF reflects the annual income distributions relative to its current market price, typically expressed as a percentage. It provides an estimate of income but does not guarantee future distributions, which can fluctuate based on interest rates and portfolio performance. Higher yield may indicate greater current income but does not necessarily imply better total return, as bond prices and yields often move inversely to interest rates.

What is the total return for a bond ETF?

Total return encompasses both income distributions and changes in market value over time. For bond ETFs, income comes from coupons paid by underlying bonds, while market value fluctuates due to interest rate movements and credit conditions. Investors may reinvest distributions for compounding. Understanding total return provides a comprehensive measure of fund performance, rather than looking solely at yield, which is essential for evaluating long-term financial outcomes and risk-adjusted gains.

How do the expense ratios of the two funds differ?

The expense ratios differ significantly between the two funds. One fund charges 0.06%, while the other charges 0.36%, representing a 0.30 percentage point difference. This fee gap means the lower-cost fund is more efficient in retaining returns for investors. Over decades, such a difference compounds, potentially resulting in material wealth accumulation discrepancies, making cost analysis a key component for long-term planning when selecting ETFs.

What type of investments do these ETFs hold?

Both ETFs operate within the Intermediate Core-Plus Bond category, indicating they invest in a mix of intermediate-term debt instruments. The 'core-plus' strategy suggests a blend of standard investment-grade bonds alongside some additional yield-enhancing assets, such as high-yield corporate debt or emerging market bonds, to seek superior returns compared to broad benchmarks, accepting slightly higher risks and volatility in exchange for enhanced potential income generation.

Do these two bond ETFs have similar top holdings?

Yes, these two bond ETFs do not share any top holdings among their listed top ten positions. While both follow intermediate core-plus strategies, the specific issuers, sectors, and individual bonds selected differ significantly, reflecting divergent security selection processes by the fund managers. The absence of overlap confirms that they are not simply tracking the identical benchmark or holding the same assets, but pursue distinct portfolios with potentially different risk-return profiles.

What do these two funds track?

Neither fund has a specific tracked index available in the data. They are both managed within the Intermediate Core-Plus Bond category, indicating active or blended management rather than pure passive index tracking. Without a disclosed benchmark, it is difficult to determine precise exposure or performance attribution against a standard market reference, highlighting the importance of examining actual portfolio composition and strategy objectives rather than relying on index comparisons.

How do dividend yields compare between the funds?

One fund offers a dividend yield of 4.77%, while the other provides 4.35%. The fund with the higher yield may potentially deliver greater current income. These yields differ by 0.42 percentage points. Investors should interpret yields as income indicators, not measures of total return or safety, as distributions can vary over time depending on underlying bond coupons, credit quality shifts, and market interest rates affecting valuations and income streams in both funds.

What does the difference in net assets indicate?

The difference in net assets indicates the funds have varying scales of operations and liquidity profiles. One fund holds $28.2 billion in net assets, while the other has $43.9 billion. Larger asset bases generally provide deeper trading liquidity and reduced bid-ask spreads, potentially enhancing investor flexibility for executing larger trades efficiently without significant price impact. Asset size alone does not determine fund quality or yield performance, but it does influence operational robustness, market stability, and liquidity dynamics.

Can distributions from these funds be reinvested?

Distributions from these funds can be reinvested if using a tax-advantaged account or setting up automatic reinvestment options. Reinvesting distributions increases exposure by purchasing additional shares with income earned, which facilitates compounding over time. Investors choosing to take distributions as cash will receive periodic income payments without share accumulation, creating a liquidity option for income needs but sacrificing the potential benefits of reinvestment in volatile or long-term markets, depending on individual goals.

Which investment goals are typically associated with these funds?

These funds are typically associated with income generation and moderate interest rate exposure, suitable for capital preservation and yield-seeking investors. Investors may select them based on cost efficiency: one fund has a 0.06% expense ratio, the other 0.36%. The higher-yielding fund at 4.77% might fit specific income targets compared to the other at 4.35%. Asset size differences, $28.2 billion versus $43.9 billion, influence liquidity. Since neither tracks a specific disclosed index, performance attribution varies by active management.

FBND vs IUSB

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) and iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (IUSB). This page outlines their fees, holdings, dividend yields and how each fund tracks the market, including asset values and expense ratios. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

FBND

Metric

IUSB

0.36%

Expense Ratio

0.06%

4.77%

Dividend Yield

4.35%

$28.23B

Net Assets

$43.85B

4,777

Holdings

18,208

Oct 6, 2014

Inception Date

Jun 10, 2014

–

Index Tracked

–

Intermediate Core-Plus Bond

Fund Category

Intermediate Core-Plus Bond

IUSB costs about $30.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

These funds do not share any of their top holdings.

Discover More Comparisons

FBND vs FIGB

Compare FBND and FIGB on fees, dividends, and structure. Both show 0.36% expense ratios. FBND holds $28.2b; FIGB has $650m. Track distinct bond strategies.

FBND vs SCHZ

Compare FBND vs SCHZ on expense ratios, dividend yields, and holdings. FBND has 0.36% fees and 4.77% yield, while SCHZ charges 0.03% with 4.26% yield.

BND vs IUSB

Compare BND and IUSB ETFs. Examine expenses, dividends, holdings, tracking, and net assets. Neutral data for intermediate bond fund research.

Investment Analysis

FBND

Pros

The fund's high dividend yield of 4.77% potentially offers greater income compared to the rival.
With $28.2 billion in assets, it benefits from substantial liquidity and scale.
The 0.36% expense ratio reflects a typical cost for a core-plus strategy.

Considerations

The 0.36% expense ratio is significantly higher than the 0.06% charged by the alternative.
Detailed top holdings and sector weights are not available, limiting transparency.
The lack of a specific tracked index makes performance attribution less clear.

IUSB

Pros

The ultra-low 0.06% expense ratio minimises the drag on returns.
With $43.9 billion in assets, it boasts very high liquidity and trading depth.
The fund's inception date of June 2014 allows for a long track record.

Considerations

The 4.35% dividend yield is lower than that of the other fund.
The absence of a disclosed benchmark index obscures tracking methodology.
No visibility into top holdings or sector weights hinders analysis.

About FBND and IUSB

FBND (FBND)

The Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) is an intermediate core-plus bond fund that seeks to provide a diversified source of income. It holds thousands of investment-grade bonds, covering government, corporate and other debt types, with the aim of balancing income potential and risk. Because it focuses on bonds, its value can rise and fall with interest rates and credit conditions; if rates move, bond prices often react. As a general educational point, bond ETFs can help spread risk across many holdings, but they are not guaranteed to perform like cash or savings. Investors should consider their time horizon and tolerance for price swings, as returns are not assured. Suitability depends on individual circumstances and overall portfolio goals.

IUSB (IUSB)

The iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (IUSB) offers investors a broad and diversified way to access the US fixed income market. As an intermediate core-plus bond fund, it seeks to provide exposure to a wide range of US dollar-denominated debt securities, including investment-grade corporate bonds, government-issued debt, and other fixed income instruments. Launched in June 2014, this ETF has grown to hold over 18,000 positions with net assets of approximately USD 43.85 billion, reflecting significant investor demand for accessible bond market exposure. With a low expense ratio of 0.06%, IUSB aims to provide cost-effective diversification. The fund currently offers a dividend yield of 4.35%, though this can fluctuate. Like all investments, capital values can rise as well as fall, and returns are not guaranteed. Investors should consider their overall portfolio strategy, risk tolerance, and investment objectives before including bond ETFs in their holdings.

Buy FBND or IUSB in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

FBND vs IUSB

Fund Snapshot