What exactly do CNXT and KSTR aim to achieve?

CNXT and KSTR are exchange-traded funds (ETFs) focused on the Greater China Region. CNXT specifically tracks companies listed on the ChiNext board in Shenzhen, which is often associated with innovative, high-growth firms. KSTR, on the other hand, targets China's technology and semiconductor sectors, aiming to capture growth in these key industrial areas. While both are categorized as Greater China Region funds, their investment themes differ: CNXT leans towards broader ChiNext innovation, whereas KSTR is sector-specific, focusing on tech and semiconductors.

How should I interpret the 'Index tracked' data for these ETFs?

For both CNXT and KSTR, the specific 'Index tracked' is listed as 'not available'. This lack of transparency can be a critical limitation when assessing ETFs because the index determines the fund's composition and performance benchmarks. For beginners, it's vital to recognise that without this data, you cannot verify how closely the fund adheres to its stated investment objective or understand its underlying methodology. This opacity requires extra caution and potentially reliance on third-party research or alternative sources for detailed due diligence before investing.

What is an expense ratio and why does it matter for these funds?

An expense ratio represents the annual cost of managing a fund, deducted from its assets. For CNXT and KSTR, these are 0.65% and 0.89% respectively. Even seemingly minor differences can significantly impact long-term returns through compounding. The 0.24 percentage point difference means that over time, KSTR costs more to own, which can eat into investment growth. Beginners should understand that lower expense ratios generally provide a better net return over extended periods, all else being equal.

How do the fees compare between CNXT and KSTR over time?

CNXT has an expense ratio of 0.65%, while KSTR's is 0.89%, making KSTR 0.24 percentage points more expensive. Over a 10-year horizon, this difference accumulates. Assuming identical gross returns of 8% per annum, the net return for CNXT would be approximately 7.35% (before other costs), and for KSTR, 7.11%. A small difference in the starting percentage can compound significantly, reducing the final portfolio value for the more expensive fund.

What is the overlap in top holdings between the two funds?

According to the provided FUND DATA, there is no shared top-10 holdings between CNXT and KSTR. This suggests that despite both targeting Chinese growth themes, their specific investment portfolios differ significantly. This lack of overlap reduces diversification if both are held simultaneously, as the funds provide distinct rather than duplicate exposure to the market. Beginners should be aware that this indicates the funds are addressing different segments of the Chinese equity market.

How do the dividend yields of CNXT and KSTR compare?

CNXT offers a dividend yield of 0.16%, while KSTR lists a yield of 0.00%. This indicates CNXT provides minimal income from its holdings, reflecting the reinvestment strategies common in growth-oriented equities. KSTR, targeting tech and semiconductor companies which typically reinvest profits for growth, does not currently distribute dividends. For income-focused investors, CNXT offers a slight edge, though both yields are minimal. Growth investors may view these low yields as indicative of the fund's focus on capital appreciation over income.

Which investing goal is each fund typically associated with?

Both CNXT and KSTR are associated with growth investing goals, specifically targeting innovation and technological advancement within Greater China. CNXT, through the ChiNext board, aligns with investors seeking exposure to emerging, high-potential companies. KSTR aligns with those targeting established tech and semiconductor sectors central to national industrial policy. Neither fund is typically considered suitable for conservative income strategies, due to their low dividend yields, but both can serve the growth objectives of investors seeking exposure to the Chinese economy's key growth engines.

What does the difference in AUM and liquidity between CNXT and KSTR imply?

CNXT has net assets of $105 million, while KSTR holds $408 million. The higher AUM of KSTR generally implies better liquidity, meaning it may be easier to buy or sell large amounts of the ETF without significantly affecting its price. A smaller fund like CNXT might experience larger bid-ask spreads or greater price volatility during trading hours. This difference is a factor when considering transaction costs and market execution, especially for larger trades.

How might the different inception dates of these ETFs influence their profiles?

CNXT was launched on 23 July 2014, while KSTR began trading on 27 January 2021. CNXT has a longer operating history, providing seven additional years of performance data for investors to assess its management effectiveness and track record across various market conditions. KSTR, being newer, has launched during a period of high demand for thematic Chinese tech investments, potentially offering a more contemporary portfolio composition but with less historical data available for analysis. Investors often consider fund age as a proxy for stability.

What transparency issues should beginners be aware of with these funds?

For both CNXT and KSTR, key information such as 'Index tracked', 'Top holdings', and 'Sector weights' are listed as 'not available'. This lack of transparency is a significant hurdle for thorough due diligence. Beginners should be cautious, as they cannot fully verify the funds' investment strategies, concentration risks, or sector exposures directly from the provided data. This necessitates seeking additional information from other reliable sources before making informed investment decisions.

Can these ETFs be considered suitable for beginners?

This is an educational overview and not personalised financial advice. Beginners should consider factors like fees, transparency and risk tolerance. Both funds have limitations such as incomplete data, making a direct comparison difficult. Understanding expense ratios and the nature of dividend yields is critical. Investors should weigh the potential growth against market risks and consider diversification strategies before deciding. This comparison provides insights to help inform personal research.

What disclaimer applies to this information?

The information provided here is for educational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Data regarding CNXT and KSTR is sourced from Yahoo Finance as of 22 September 2026 and may be subject to change. Always conduct independent research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Investing in the stock market involves risks, including the potential loss of principal.

CNXT vs KSTR

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in October 2026.

This page compares VanEck ChiNext Innovators ETF (CNXT) and Kraneshares China Tech & Semi Star 50 ETF (KSTR) regarding fees, holdings, dividends, and market tracking. CNXT has a 0.65% expense ratio and 0.16% yield, while KSTR has a 0.89% expense ratio and no listed yield. Both target Greater China tech, but track different indexes; holdings and sectors not available. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

CNXT

Metric

KSTR

0.65%

Expense Ratio

0.89%

0.16%

Dividend Yield

0.00%

$104.79M

Net Assets

$407.62M

100

Holdings

Jul 23, 2014

Inception Date

Jan 27, 2021

–

Index Tracked

–

Greater China Region

Fund Category

Greater China Region

CNXT costs about $24.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

These funds do not share any of their top holdings.

Discover More Comparisons

CQQQ vs KSTR

Compare CQQQ vs KSTR China tech ETFs. Assess 0.65% vs 0.89% expense ratios, 2.35% vs 0.00% yields, and concentration in PDD for informed research.

Investment Analysis

CNXT

Pros

VanEck’s established reputation as a specialist issuer may enhance investor confidence in this fund’s governance.
A lower expense ratio of 0.65 per cent reduces annual cost drag compared to many thematic alternatives.
Inception in 2014 provides a longer operating history and track record than newer thematic Chinese technology funds.

Considerations

Net assets of 105 million dollars indicate a relatively small fund that may face liquidity constraints.
Index tracking details and top holdings are not available, limiting transparency for rigorous due diligence.
A dividend yield of only 0.16 per cent offers minimal income generation for equity-focused investors.

KSTR

Pros

Net assets of 408 million dollars suggest better liquidity and trading depth than smaller thematic ETFs.
Focus on China technology and semiconductors targets high-growth sectors central to current industrial policy priorities.
Launch in January 2021 places inception within a period of strong thematic demand for Chinese tech exposure.

Considerations

An expense ratio of 0.89 per cent increases annual costs relative to broader or cheaper index funds.
Index methodology and sector weights are not available, obscuring precise concentration and replication risks.
A dividend yield of 0.00 per cent confirms no current income stream for growth-oriented holdings.

About CNXT and KSTR

CNXT (CNXT)

The VanEck ChiNext Innovators ETF offers investors exposure to a focused selection of growth-oriented companies listed on China's ChiNext market. Designed to highlight innovation, this fund typically targets smaller, dynamic firms involved in sectors like technology, healthcare, and consumer services. With approximately 100 holdings, it provides a concentrated view of China's emerging innovation landscape. The fund has an expense ratio of 0.65% and currently holds net assets of around USD 105 million. Investors should note that while the potential for growth in the ChiNext sector is significant, these investments are subject to high volatility and specific regional risks, including regulatory changes. As with any international investment, values can rise and fall, and capital is at risk.

KSTR (KSTR)

The Kraneshares China Technology & Semiconductor Star 50 Index ETF provides targeted exposure to leading Chinese technology and semiconductor companies. Designed to track the STAR 50 index, this fund captures the innovation-driven sectors within China’s rapidly evolving tech landscape. Investors gain access to key players in artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and semiconductor manufacturing. Launched in 2021, it offers a modern approach to China equity investing, with an expense ratio of 0.89% and net assets of USD 408 million across 53 holdings. While the ETF provides growth potential in high-technology industries, it also carries risks due to regulatory changes and geopolitical factors in China. It does not pay dividends, making it suitable for capital appreciation strategies. Always consider the sector volatility when allocating to this ETF.

Buy CNXT or KSTR in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

CNXT vs KSTR

Fund Snapshot

Discover More Comparisons

CQQQ vs KSTR

Investment Analysis

CNXT

Pros

Considerations

KSTR

Pros

Considerations

About CNXT and KSTR

Buy CNXT or KSTR in Nemo

Zero Commission

Trusted & Regulated

6% Interest on Cash

Frequently asked questions

What exactly do CNXT and KSTR aim to achieve?

How should I interpret the 'Index tracked' data for these ETFs?

What is an expense ratio and why does it matter for these funds?

How do the fees compare between CNXT and KSTR over time?

What is the overlap in top holdings between the two funds?

How do the dividend yields of CNXT and KSTR compare?

Which investing goal is each fund typically associated with?

What does the difference in AUM and liquidity between CNXT and KSTR imply?

How might the different inception dates of these ETFs influence their profiles?

What transparency issues should beginners be aware of with these funds?

Can these ETFs be considered suitable for beginners?

What disclaimer applies to this information?

Fund Snapshot

About CNXT and KSTR

Discover More Comparisons

CQQQ vs KSTR