Nemo Money has over 1 million (1M+) downloads with a high rating of 4.6 stars from thousands of reviews. Join Nemo and trade with 0% commission.Nemo Money has over 1 million (1M+) downloads with a high rating of 4.6 stars from thousands of reviews. Join Nemo and trade with 0% commission.Nemo Money has over 1 million (1M+) downloads with a high rating of 4.6 stars from thousands of reviews. Join Nemo and trade with 0% commission.Nemo Money has over 1 million (1M+) downloads with a high rating of 4.6 stars from thousands of reviews. Join Nemo and trade with 0% commission.
Church & DwightClorox

Church & Dwight vs Clorox

Church & Dwight vs Clorox compares two major consumer goods companies. This page reviews business models, financial performance, and market context to help readers understand how each company operates...

Investment Analysis

Pros

  • Church & Dwight has lower stock price volatility than Clorox, indicating less price fluctuation risk with a beta of 0.43 versus Cloroxโ€™s 0.52.
  • The company has a strong analyst consensus with a potential upside of about 16.5%, higher than Cloroxโ€™s 12.2% implied upside.
  • Church & Dwight maintains a substantial market cap and diverse portfolio spanning household, personal care, and specialty products supporting stable revenue sources.

Considerations

  • Church & Dwightโ€™s net profit margin at around 8.66% is lower than Cloroxโ€™s 11.4%, indicating less profitability relative to sales.
  • The companyโ€™s maximum historical drawdown of about -51.5% suggests moderate downside risk during market stress periods.
  • Growth and earnings estimates appear more muted compared to Cloroxโ€™s recent pricing strength and projected EPS growth rate.

Pros

  • Clorox enjoys a higher net margin of approximately 11.4%, reflecting stronger profitability compared to peer Church & Dwight.
  • The companyโ€™s disinfecting and cleaning products benefited from heightened demand post-COVID, supporting sustained revenue growth opportunities.
  • Clorox projects a near 15% earnings growth in fiscal 2025, underpinned by effective pricing power despite sector challenges.

Considerations

  • Cloroxโ€™s stock has shown higher volatility at 6.31%, indicating greater short-term price risk than Church & Dwight.
  • The stock has underperformed recently with a notable year-to-date decline exceeding Church & Dwightโ€™s fall, reflecting investor caution.
  • Shares trade at a premium valuation with a forward P/E near 19.5 times, limiting upside if growth slows as projected in 2026.

Related Market Insights

Beauty Giants: Why These Consumer Staples Could Weather Any Storm

Discover why beauty stocks are recession-resistant consumer staples. Explore top companies like P&G, J&J, Unilever, poised for growth in the $716B global market. Invest with Nemo.

Author avatar

Aimee Silverwood | Financial Analyst

July 25, 2025

Read Insight

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Beauty

Beauty

These beauty stocks represent leading companies in skincare, haircare, and makeup. Carefully selected by our analysts, these investments offer exposure to a growing global industry expected to reach $716.6 billion by 2025.

Published: May 21, 2025

Explore Basket

Buy CHD or CLX in Nemo

Nemo Logo Fade
๐Ÿ†“

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

๐Ÿ”’

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

๐Ÿ’ฐ

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

Discover More Comparisons

Church & DwightUS Foods

Church & Dwight vs US Foods

Church & Dwight vs US Foods

Church & DwightCelsius

Church & Dwight vs Celsius

Church & Dwight vs Celsius

Church & DwightPerformance Food Group

Church & Dwight vs Performance Food Group

Church & Dwight vs Performance Food Group

Frequently asked questions