How do I interpret the expense ratio difference between Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF?

The expense ratio represents the annual management fee. Capital Group Dividend Value ETF charges 0.33% while iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF charges 0.08%. This 0.25 percentage point difference means investors pay significantly less in fees for the iShares fund. Lower costs allow more compounding growth over time, though active management strategies may justify higher fees through potential alpha generation.

What does dividend yield indicate when comparing Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF?

The dividend yield shows how much income investors receive relative to their investment. iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF provides a 1.94% yield versus Capital Group Dividend Value ETF's 1.17%. Higher yields suggest better income generation but require careful analysis of underlying holdings and payment sustainability. Investors should consider whether focusing on income or growth aligns with their objectives.

How do I understand holdings overlap when comparing Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF?

These funds share two major holdings in their top ten: Microsoft and Broadcom. Microsoft appears in both funds with weights of 7.59% and 3.03% respectively, while Broadcom has 4.60% and 2.77%. The remaining positions differ significantly, indicating distinct portfolio construction approaches despite some common large-cap technology and industrial stocks.

How do the inception dates affect the track records of Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF?

Capital Group Dividend Value ETF launched on 22 February 2022, offering limited historical performance data. In contrast, iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF began on 10 June 2014, providing approximately eight additional years of track record data. Older funds like iShares Core Dividend Growth offer more comprehensive historical performance analysis.

What does net asset size indicate about liquidity for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF?

Both funds maintain substantial assets under management: $38.3 billion for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and $42.9 billion for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF. Larger fund sizes generally provide better liquidity, lower bid-ask spreads, and higher trading volumes, facilitating easier buying and selling for retail and institutional investors alike.

Which fund has a lower expense ratio between Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF?

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF has the lower expense ratio at 0.08% compared to Capital Group Dividend Value ETF's 0.33%. This means iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF keeps more of each dollar invested working to compound over time, reducing long-term costs while maintaining similar large value dividend stock exposure.

Which ETF typically aligns with dividend income investors when comparing Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF?

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF is generally better suited for income-focused investors due to its higher dividend yield of 1.94% versus Capital Group Dividend Value ETF's 1.17%. The iShares fund specifically tracks companies with consistent dividend growth histories, offering more predictable income streams for retirees and income-dependent investors.

What types of companies do Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF hold?

Capital Group Dividend Value ETF maintains technology-heavy positions including Microsoft (7.59%), Nvidia (6.56%), and Meta (5.06%), with some industrials like RTX and GE. iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF has a more diversified portfolio featuring Apple (3.12%), Exxon Mobil (3.06%), Microsoft (3.03%), and financials like JPMorgan Chase and industrial companies, focusing on companies with established dividend growth histories.

How do market conditions affect Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF?

Both large value dividend funds experience volatility during economic downturns. Technology-heavy Capital Group Dividend Value ETF may be more sensitive to sector rotations, while iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF's diversified portfolio of financials and industrials typically provides more stable distributions across market cycles.

How do top holdings influence Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF?

Capital Group Dividend Value ETF's tech concentration in Microsoft and Nvidia may increase portfolio volatility and yield exposure to sector performance swings. iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF's diversified holdings like Apple, financials, and industrials provide broader market exposure. Shared holdings like Microsoft and Broadcom create partial overlap in performance correlation.

Can investors combine Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF?

While possible, combining these funds introduces redundancy through shared top holdings like Microsoft and Broadcom. Investors should weigh whether the active management style of Capital Group Dividend Value ETF complements or duplicates the index-tracking approach of iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF within a broader dividend strategy.

What key factors should beginners consider when evaluating ETF comparisons?

Beginners should examine expense ratios, dividend yields, holdings overlap, inception dates, and net assets when comparing ETFs like Capital Group Dividend Value ETF and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF. These metrics reveal cost efficiency, income potential, diversification level, track record length, and liquidity characteristics essential for informed investment decisions.

CGDV vs DGRO

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

This page compares the Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) and the iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO), examining their fees, holdings, dividends, and how each tracks its market. With expense ratios of 0.33% and 0.08% respectively, and dividend yields of 1.17% and 1.94%, both funds target large value stocks but differ in their approach. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

CGDV

Metric

DGRO

0.33%

Expense Ratio

0.08%

1.17%

Dividend Yield

1.94%

$38.26B

Net Assets

$42.93B

Holdings

396

Feb 22, 2022

Inception Date

Jun 10, 2014

–

Index Tracked

–

Large Value

Fund Category

Large Value

DGRO costs about $25.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

Holding	CGDV	DGRO
MSFTMicrosoft Corporation	7.59%	3.03%
AVGOBroadcom Inc.	4.60%	2.77%

Discover More Comparisons

CGDV vs FDVV

Compare CGDV and FDVV on fees, holdings and dividends. Both track large value equities. Review expense ratios and yields to assess differences.

CGDV vs VIG

Compare CGDV and VIG on expenses, yields, holdings and performance metrics. Discover key differences to inform your research into dividend ETFs today.

CGDV vs QQQ

Compare CGDV and QQQ ETFs. Review 0.33% versus 0.18% fees, 1.17% versus 0.41% yields, shared tech holdings, and large value versus growth factors.

Investment Analysis

CGDV

Pros

Institutional issuer Capital Group manages assets effectively through a structured large-value strategy.
Substantial net assets of $38.3 billion enhance liquidity and attract broad institutional and retail investor confidence.
Top holdings like Microsoft and Nvidia offer technological dominance and growth potential within the value strategy framework.

Considerations

The 0.33 percent expense ratio is high compared to lower-cost competitors such as iShares Core Dividend Growth.
Trailing dividend yield of 1.17 percent is modest for a dividend-focused large-cap equity fund offering.
A recent 2022 inception date provides limited historical performance data compared to funds with older track records.

DGRO

Pros

An expense ratio of 0.08 percent significantly reduces annual costs for long-term investors over decades.
Assets under management of $42.9 billion improve liquidity and support efficient index-tracking mechanisms.
A dividend yield of 1.94 percent offers attractive income generation for income-focused investors.

Considerations

The relatively low expense ratio may indicate potential tracking errors due to high costs from rebalancing activities.
Dividend yields of 1.94 percent remain modest compared to high-income funds offering stronger distributions.
Since inception, the fund has had a 12-year history, which may limit its long-term track record.

About CGDV and DGRO

CGDV (CGDV)

The Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) is a large-cap value fund designed to provide investors with exposure to dividend-paying companies. Launched in February 2022, it holds a concentrated portfolio of 59 positions, focusing on established firms with potential for income and value appreciation. The fund carries an expense ratio of 0.33%, which is moderate for an actively managed ETF strategy. With net assets of USD 38.26 billion, it offers substantial liquidity. Investors should note its current dividend yield of 1.17%, which provides modest income compared to high-yield sectors. As with all value strategies, performance can vary significantly depending on market cycles and economic conditions. It is important to remember that capital values can rise as well as fall, and dividends are not guaranteed. This fund suits those looking for a balanced approach to large-cap value investing within an ETF wrapper, but thorough personal research is always recommended before making any investment decisions.

DGRO (DGRO)

The iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) is designed to provide investors with exposure to US companies that have a history of increasing their dividend payouts. This fund targets large-cap equities with sustainable dividend growth strategies rather than just high current yields. With an attractive low expense ratio of 0.08% and substantial net assets of USD 42.93 billion, it offers broad diversification across 396 holdings. The fund’s focus on large value stocks aims to balance income potential with capital appreciation opportunities. Investors should note that while the current dividend yield is approximately 1.94%, payouts are not guaranteed and can fluctuate based on company performance and market conditions. As with any equity investment, the value of shares can rise and fall, meaning returns are not assured. It serves as a general educational example for those interested in dividend-growth strategies within the broader market.

Buy CGDV or DGRO in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

CGDV vs DGRO

Fund Snapshot