What are the expense ratios for these ETFs?

Both the Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) and the Schwab Short-Term U.S Treasury ETF (SCHO) have an expense ratio of 0.03%. This low fee structure is identical for both funds, meaning the annual cost of managing the fund is very similar. For investors, this suggests that fees alone should not be the primary deciding factor, as both options are highly cost-efficient within the bond ETF market.

How does duration affect price volatility in bond ETFs?

Duration measures a bond fund's sensitivity to interest rate changes. Intermediate Core Bond funds like BND typically hold bonds with longer maturities, making them more sensitive to rate shifts than shorter-duration funds. As a result, BND may experience greater price volatility than SCHO, which focuses on shorter-term securities. Generally, shorter-duration funds tend to have more stable prices, whereas longer-duration funds may see more significant fluctuations in response to market movements.

What is the significance of net assets in ETFs?

Net assets, or total assets under management, indicate the size of a fund. BND has $162.5 billion in net assets, significantly higher than SCHO's $15.3 billion. While both funds are substantial in size, larger funds often benefit from greater liquidity and economies of scale. However, fund size alone does not guarantee performance; it primarily reflects investor adoption and the fund's role in the broader fixed-income market.

How do the dividend yields compare between the two funds?

The Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) offers a dividend yield of 4.10%, while the Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) has a yield of 3.83%. These yields represent the income generated by the underlying bonds in each portfolio. Typically, broader bond market funds like BND may offer slightly higher yields due to their inclusion of corporate and mortgage-backed securities, which often pay more than government-only portfolios, assuming comparable credit quality and duration factors.

What types of securities do these ETFs hold?

BND tracks an index that includes intermediate core bond securities, typically encompassing U.S. government, corporate, and mortgage-backed bonds. SCHO focuses specifically on short-term U.S. Treasury securities. This distinction is critical: BND offers broader diversification across various issuer types, potentially introducing credit risk, whereas SCHO concentrates on government-backed debt, which generally carries lower credit risk but may offer lower yields. Understanding these underlying assets is key to assessing portfolio fit.

Why are top holdings data not available for both funds?

For both BND and SCHO, the specific top holdings and detailed sector weights are currently listed as not available. This lack of transparency prevents a granular analysis of concentration risk or specific issuer exposure at the moment. Investors relying on holdings-based diversification strategies may find this limitation notable, as they cannot immediately verify the exact composition of the portfolios against benchmark indices or assess detailed overlap between the two funds using this specific dataset.

How do the inception dates differ for these funds?

BND was launched on 3 April 2007, providing a longer historical track record for investors to review performance over various market cycles. SCHO was established later, on 5 August 2010. While SCHO offers a solid multi-year history, BND's earlier inception means it has been tested through additional market events, including the 2008 financial crisis and subsequent recovery periods. Longer track records can help investors understand how a fund behaves during significant market stress.

How do interest rate environments impact these ETFs?

Bond ETFs generally react to changes in interest rates. Because SCHO holds short-term Treasury securities, its price volatility due to interest rate changes is typically lower than that of intermediate-term bond funds. BND, holding intermediate core bonds, may see more pronounced price adjustments when rates shift. Investors often monitor central bank policies and inflation data, as these factors drive yield curve changes, directly influencing the performance of both funds in different ways.

What is the credit risk profile of each fund?

SCHO focuses on U.S. Treasuries, which are generally considered to have minimal credit risk as they are backed by the U.S. government. BND includes a broader range of securities, potentially including corporate bonds and mortgage-backed securities, which may carry higher credit risk than government-only portfolios. While the specific sector weights for BND are not available, intermediate core bond categories typically imply a mix of credit qualities, contrasting with the predominantly high credit quality of short government funds.

What does the difference in fund category imply?

BND falls under the 'Intermediate Core Bond' category, suggesting a focus on diversified bond investments with moderate duration. SCHO is classified as 'Short Government', indicating an emphasis on shorter-duration, government-issued debt. These category distinctions highlight different roles in a fixed-income portfolio. Intermediate core funds often serve as a broad market benchmark, while short government funds are frequently used for capital preservation or reducing portfolio duration, catering to different investor risk tolerances and market outlooks.

How do ETF distributions work in practice?

ETFs like BND and SCHO typically distribute income earned from the underlying bonds to shareholders periodically, often monthly or quarterly. This income comes from coupon payments on the bonds held in the portfolio. When you hold these funds, you receive these distributions, which are reported as dividends or capital gains. The yield figures (4.10% for BND and 3.83% for SCHO) reflect the trailing annualized income relative to the fund's price, offering an indication of potential cash flow.

Can these funds be used for specific financial goals?

BND's broader exposure and intermediate duration may align with goals requiring balanced income and moderate growth potential over time. SCHO's short-duration, government-focused structure may suit objectives prioritizing lower volatility and capital preservation, such as holding cash reserves or near-term liability matching. Neither fund is inherently superior; their suitability depends entirely on the investor's specific time horizon, risk tolerance, and income requirements. Consulting the fund prospectuses is essential for detailed goal alignment.

BND vs SCHO

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) and Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO). Review fees, holdings, dividends, and tracking. Both have 0.03% expense ratios. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

BND

Metric

SCHO

0.03%

Expense Ratio

0.03%

4.10%

Dividend Yield

3.83%

$162.51B

Net Assets

$15.28B

15,000

Holdings

Apr 3, 2007

Inception Date

Aug 5, 2010

–

Index Tracked

–

Intermediate Core Bond

Fund Category

Short Government

Both funds charge the same annual fee.

Shared Top Holdings

These funds do not share any of their top holdings.

Discover More Comparisons

BND vs FBND

Compare BND and FBND on fees, dividends and holdings. BND has a 0.03% expense ratio and 4.10% yield, while FBND charges 0.36% with a 4.77% yield.

BND vs TLT

Compare BND vs TLT on fees, holdings, dividends, and tracking. BND has a 0.03% expense ratio and 4.10% yield; TLT has a 0.15% expense ratio and 4.76% yield.

BND vs BNDW

Compare BND and BNDW ETFs. Review expense ratios, dividend yields, tracking methods and holdings availability for factual investment analysis.

Investment Analysis

BND

Pros

Low 0.03% expense ratio and $162.5 billion in net assets support high liquidity and cost efficiency.
Inception date of Apr 3, 2007 provides a long track record for a diversified intermediate core bond portfolio.
A 4.10% dividend yield offers a meaningful income stream typical for broad US bond market exposure.

Considerations

The fund's index tracked is not available, which limits immediate clarity on its exact benchmark methodology.
Top holdings and sector weights are not available, making detailed risk analysis and concentration assessment difficult.
As an intermediate core bond ETF, it may experience greater price volatility than shorter-duration government bond funds.

SCHO

Pros

The 0.03% expense ratio and $15.3 billion in net assets provide a low-cost option for short-term Treasury exposure.
Inception date of Aug 5, 2010 offers a solid multi-year track record for this short government category fund.
Focus on US Treasuries generally reduces credit risk compared to corporate bond holdings, despite not providing full safety.

Considerations

The index tracked by the fund is not available, so precise benchmark alignment details cannot be verified from data.
A 3.83% dividend yield is lower than the 4.10% yield of the broader Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF.
Top holdings and sector weights are not available, which hinders transparency on the specific duration and maturity spread.

About BND and SCHO

BND (BND)

The Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) is designed to track the performance of a broad, investment-grade U.S. bond market index. With an intermediate core bond focus, it holds over 15,000 securities, including U.S. Treasuries, government-backed mortgages, and corporate bonds. This extensive diversification aims to mitigate the impact of any single credit default. Investors often view BND as a foundational income component for balanced portfolios, seeking lower volatility compared to equities. The fund carries a minimal expense ratio of 0.03%, helping to preserve returns. While it currently offers a yield of approximately 4.10%, potential investors should remember that bond prices typically move inversely to interest rates. If rates rise, the fund's value may decline. Conversely, falling rates often support bond prices. BND provides a convenient way to access the fixed-income market, though returns are not guaranteed, and capital is at risk.

SCHO (SCHO)

The Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) provides exposure to U.S. government debt with maturities of between one and three years. Designed as a lower-risk bond holding, it aims to generate income while managing sensitivity to interest rate changes more effectively than long-term treasuries. With a low expense ratio of 0.03%, this fund is a cost-efficient option for investors seeking stability within their portfolios. While it holds a dividend yield of approximately 3.83%, returns are subject to market conditions and do not come with guaranteed outcomes. As with any investment, the value of the fund can fall as well as rise, and investors should consider their own risk tolerance and financial goals before allocating funds.

Buy BND or SCHO in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

BND vs SCHO

Fund Snapshot