What is the key difference between BND and FBND in terms of fund strategy?

BND is an Intermediate Core Bond fund, generally focusing on high-quality, investment-grade bonds like Treasuries and agency mortgages to track the broader market. FBND is an Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund, which means it may add slight credit risk or extend duration to potentially boost returns. While both target the general bond market, the Core-Plus strategy allows FBND more flexibility to deviate from a strict benchmark index to seek higher yield compared to BND.

How do ETF dividends work when comparing these two funds?

Both BND and FBND distribute interest earned from their underlying bonds to shareholders, typically paying out monthly. These distributions are not guaranteed and can vary based on the bonds' coupons and the fund's management. BND has a current dividend yield of 4.10%, while FBND offers 4.77%. Higher yields do not always mean better returns; they often reflect the income generated by the portfolio, which may include different types of bonds with varying risk profiles.

What does net assets mean for these ETFs and why does it matter?

Net assets represent the total market value of the securities held by the fund. BND has net assets exceeding $162.5 billion, indicating very deep liquidity, which generally leads to tighter bid-ask spreads and easier trading. FBND has $28.2 billion in net assets, which is still substantial and ensures reliable trading volume. While BND is larger, both funds have sufficient scale for most investors, though BND's size may offer marginal advantages in execution costs for high-frequency traders.

Which fund has a lower expense ratio and how does this impact long-term holding?

BND has a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.03% compared to FBND's 0.36%. This difference of 0.33 percentage points represents the annual cost deducted from your investment. Over long holding periods, lower fees can compound, allowing more of your returns to remain in the fund. While FBND's higher yield may offset this cost in the short term, BND's ultra-low cost structure is a key advantage for investors prioritising minimum drag on capital over extended time horizons.

How do the inception dates of BND and FBND affect their track records?

BND was launched on April 3, 2007, giving it a lengthy track record spanning nearly two decades. This allows investors to assess its performance through various market cycles, including rising and falling interest rate environments. FBND has a shorter history, with an inception date of October 6, 2014. While it has operated for several years, it has less historical data available for long-term performance analysis compared to BND, which may be a consideration for investors who prefer established histories.

Are the top holdings of BND and FBND similar?

Detailed information on the specific top holdings and sector weights is not available for either fund in the provided data. Consequently, it is not possible to confirm if there is a high degree of overlap in their top 10 holdings. Both funds broadly track the bond market, but given their different strategies—Core versus Core-Plus—the composition of their portfolios may differ significantly in terms of credit quality and duration, even if some major issuers like the US Treasury appear in both.

Why does FBND have a higher dividend yield than BND?

FBND's dividend yield of 4.77% is higher than BND's 4.10%. This difference is often linked to their fund categories. BND is a Core Bond fund, focusing on lower-risk, investment-grade issues. FBND is a Core-Plus fund, which may incorporate additional credit risk or slightly longer duration to generate extra income. The higher yield in FBND reflects the potential additional income from these strategies, though it may come with different risk characteristics compared to the strictly high-quality focus of BND.

How are these funds affected by rising interest rates?

Both BND and FBND are exposed to interest rate risk because they invest in intermediate-term bonds. When interest rates rise, bond prices typically fall, which can result in capital losses for ETF holders. As an Intermediate Core Bond fund, BND's sensitivity to these changes is a key factor. FBND, as a Core-Plus fund, might extend duration or add credit risk, which can also impact its price movement during rate cycles. Investors should understand that bond ETFs can lose value, not just generate income.

What role does the total bond market play in a portfolio?

Total bond market ETFs like BND and FBND are designed to provide broad exposure to the investment-grade bond universe. Typically, investors associate these funds with goals such as capital preservation, income generation, or reducing overall portfolio volatility. BND's Core strategy is often seen as a stabilising force, while FBND's Core-Plus approach might be viewed as slightly more aggressive in seeking yield. Neither is a cash substitute, and both fluctuate in value based on market conditions.

Can investors compare the specific sector weights of BND and FBND?

No, the provided data explicitly states that sector weights are not available for both BND and FBND. This limits the ability to perform a detailed bottom-up comparison of their exposure to specific industries or bond types, such as mortgage-backed securities or corporate credits. While the broad category (Intermediate Core vs Core-Plus) gives an idea of their composition, investors looking for granular transparency into the exact percentage allocated to each sector will not find that information in the current dataset.

Which fund is more accessible for beginner investors based on fees?

Accessibility often relates to cost. BND's expense ratio of 0.03% is extremely low, making it highly accessible for beginners who want to minimise ongoing fees. FBND's expense ratio of 0.36% is higher, though still within the range of actively managed bond funds. For a beginner focused on strict cost control, BND's structure is advantageous. However, accessibility also depends on share price and liquidity, where BND's larger asset base ($162.5 billion vs $28.2 billion) provides robust trading infrastructure.

BND vs FBND

Two funds, one decision: we compare cost, performance and what each ETF actually holds in September 2026.

Compare BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) and FBND (Fidelity Total Bond ETF) to review fees, holdings and dividends. BND has a 0.03% expense ratio and a 4.10% dividend yield, while FBND has a 0.36% expense ratio and a 4.77% dividend yield. Both track broader bond markets, though top holdings and sector weights are not available. Educational content, not financial advice.

Fund Snapshot

Key Fund Metrics

BND

Metric

FBND

0.03%

Expense Ratio

0.36%

4.10%

Dividend Yield

4.77%

$162.51B

Net Assets

$28.23B

15,000

Holdings

4,777

Apr 3, 2007

Inception Date

Oct 6, 2014

–

Index Tracked

–

Intermediate Core Bond

Fund Category

Intermediate Core-Plus Bond

BND costs about $33.00 less per year for every $10,000 invested.

Shared Top Holdings

These funds do not share any of their top holdings.

Discover More Comparisons

BND vs SCHO

Compare BND and SCHO ETFs. Review fees, holdings, dividends, and tracking. Both have 0.03% expense ratios. Educational content, not financial advice.

BND vs TLT

Compare BND vs TLT on fees, holdings, dividends, and tracking. BND has a 0.03% expense ratio and 4.10% yield; TLT has a 0.15% expense ratio and 4.76% yield.

BND vs BNDW

Compare BND and BNDW ETFs. Review expense ratios, dividend yields, tracking methods and holdings availability for factual investment analysis.

Investment Analysis

BND

Pros

BND offers an extremely low expense ratio of 0.03%, significantly reducing cost drag over long holding periods.
With net assets exceeding $162.5 billion, the fund provides deep liquidity and tight bid-ask spreads for traders.
It has a lengthy track record dating back to April 2007, allowing investors to assess its historical stability.

Considerations

The dividend yield of 4.10% is lower than many higher-risk core-plus alternatives in the same asset class.
Specific top holdings and sector weights are not available in the provided data, limiting immediate portfolio transparency.
As an intermediate core bond fund, its sensitivity to interest rate changes may result in capital losses if rates rise sharply.

FBND

Pros

FBND provides a higher dividend yield of 4.77% compared to its core bond counterpart, potentially increasing income.
As an Intermediate Core-Plus fund, it may offer additional return opportunities by extending duration or adding credit risk.
With $28.2 billion in assets, the fund maintains sufficient scale for reliable trading volume and accessibility.

Considerations

The expense ratio of 0.36% is notably higher than BND, creating greater cost barriers to achieving net returns.
It has a shorter history since its inception in October 2014, providing less long-term data for performance analysis.
Detailed information on top holdings and sector weights is not available, obscuring specific exposure to individual issuers.

About BND and FBND

BND (BND)

The Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) is designed to track the performance of a broad, investment-grade U.S. bond market index. With an intermediate core bond focus, it holds over 15,000 securities, including U.S. Treasuries, government-backed mortgages, and corporate bonds. This extensive diversification aims to mitigate the impact of any single credit default. Investors often view BND as a foundational income component for balanced portfolios, seeking lower volatility compared to equities. The fund carries a minimal expense ratio of 0.03%, helping to preserve returns. While it currently offers a yield of approximately 4.10%, potential investors should remember that bond prices typically move inversely to interest rates. If rates rise, the fund's value may decline. Conversely, falling rates often support bond prices. BND provides a convenient way to access the fixed-income market, though returns are not guaranteed, and capital is at risk.

FBND (FBND)

The Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) is an intermediate core-plus bond fund that seeks to provide a diversified source of income. It holds thousands of investment-grade bonds, covering government, corporate and other debt types, with the aim of balancing income potential and risk. Because it focuses on bonds, its value can rise and fall with interest rates and credit conditions; if rates move, bond prices often react. As a general educational point, bond ETFs can help spread risk across many holdings, but they are not guaranteed to perform like cash or savings. Investors should consider their time horizon and tolerance for price swings, as returns are not assured. Suitability depends on individual circumstances and overall portfolio goals.

Buy BND or FBND in Nemo

🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

BND vs FBND

Fund Snapshot