• 5 min read
• Published on 1 August 2025
Listen to article
6:32Hey! We are Nemo.
Nemo, short for Never Miss Out, is a mobile investment platform that delivers curated, data-driven investment ideas to your fingertips. It offers commission-free trading across stocks, ETFs, crypto, and CFDs, along with AI-powered tools, real-time market alerts, and themed stock collections called Nemes.
Download the App
Scan the QR code to download the Nemo app and start investing on Nemo today
Published on 14 September 2026
Read article
Published on 14 September 2026
Read article
Published on 13 September 2026
Read article
Published on 12 September 2026
Read article
Published on 12 September 2026
Read article
Let's be honest, when you think of government contracts, you probably picture endless paperwork, glacial progress, and technology that was cutting edge sometime during the Cold War. For the most part, you’d be right. But it seems the Pentagon has finally had its 'aha' moment, and for investors, it’s a moment worth paying very close attention to.
The catalyst for this newfound clarity is a rather chunky $10 billion software contract the US Army has handed to Palantir. Now, while that’s a lovely number for Palantir’s shareholders, the real story isn’t the sum. It’s the strategy. This single deal sweeps away 75, count them, 75 separate, messy contracts. Imagine trying to run a business with 75 different phone providers. It’s madness. The Army is finally tidying its digital house, and it’s doing so by embracing commercial, off-the-shelf technology that can be deployed quickly. This isn't just a new contract, it’s a complete change in philosophy. They’re swapping bureaucracy for speed, and that spells opportunity.
While Palantir is grabbing the headlines, don’t for a second think the established titans are sitting this one out. I’m talking about the likes of Northrop Grumman and General Dynamics. These aren’t just metal-bashers building planes and tanks anymore. They are, for all intents and purposes, technology firms that happen to have governments as their primary clients. Northrop has been pouring money into autonomous systems and AI, the sort of clever computing that can tell a threat from a tractor in a satellite image. General Dynamics, meanwhile, is building the secure digital plumbing, the cloud infrastructure and communications networks, that all this data needs to flow through. To me, this signals a fundamental shift. These companies are developing tech with military-grade resilience that could, down the line, find its way into all sorts of commercial uses.
So, why the sudden rush? Modern conflict, whether it’s on a battlefield or in cyberspace, is won and lost on information. The side that can gather, understand, and act on data the fastest has an almost unbeatable edge. The old model of siloed systems just doesn’t cut it when you’re drowning in data from drones, satellites, and sensors. You need sophisticated AI to connect the dots in real time. This is the core of the Defense Tech's Digital Overhaul, a move from analogue warfare to a digital chess match. For investors, this is a compelling narrative. It’s a long-term trend driven by a non-negotiable need, national security. Budgets in this area tend to be remarkably resilient, even when the wider economy is looking a bit peaky.
Of course, nothing is without risk. Political winds can change, and a new administration might have different priorities. But the technological arms race, particularly with rivals like China, isn’t going away. If anything, the imperative to stay ahead is only growing stronger. These companies also benefit from what I like to call a regulatory moat. The security clearances and complex rules required to work with the military create enormous barriers to entry, which is rather convenient for the established players. It keeps the competition at bay and, for investors, provides a degree of predictability in a very unpredictable world.
View the full Basket:Defense Tech's Digital Overhaul
View the full Basket:Defense Tech's Digital Overhaul
This article is marketing material and should not be construed as investment advice. No information set out in this article be considered, as advice, recommendation, offer, or a solicitation, to buy or sell any financial product, nor is it financial, investment, or trading advice. Any references to specific financial product or investment strategy are for illustrative / educational purposes only and subject to change without notice. It is the investor’s responsibility to evaluate any prospective investment, assess their own financial situation, and seek independent professional advice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Please refer to our Risk Disclosure.
Published on 14 September 2026
Read article
Published on 14 September 2026
Read article
Published on 13 September 2026
Read article
Published on 12 September 2026
Read article
Published on 12 September 2026
Read article