Phillips 66SLB

Phillips 66 vs SLB

Phillips 66 and SLB are examined side by side to illuminate how each operates in today’s energy landscape. This page compares business models, financial performance, and market context, presenting neu...

Why It's Moving

Phillips 66

Phillips 66 surges past market gains as analysts lift targets amid strategic asset sales.

  • Piper Sandler raised its price target from $170 to $171 on December 5, maintaining a neutral stance, while Barclays hiked to $141, reflecting optimism on operational shifts[5][2].
  • Company finalized €2.5 billion sale of 65% stake in German JET network to Stonepeak on December 1, streamlining focus on core refining amid high utilization rates[3][7].
  • Declared $1.20 quarterly dividend payable December 1, underscoring commitment to shareholders despite LA refinery wind-down by year-end[3].
Sentiment:
🐃Bullish
SLB

SLB stock reacts to mixed signals: robust contract wins offset by softer North American activity and cautious margins guidance

  • International contract wins and backlog growth — SLB disclosed several sizable international awards in the past week that expand its integrated services footprint, reinforcing revenue visibility and validating its push into higher-value, technology-driven projects.
  • North America land softness — Management cautioned that U.S. land activity remains softer-than-expected, implying lower short-term service volumes in the core oilfield services book and pressure on utilization and pricing for traditional completions work.
  • Strategy and margin focus — SLB emphasized its tech-led repositioning and New Energy initiatives while noting margin headwinds from mix and pricing; the implication is that long-term structural upgrades could lift profitability, but near-term results depend on margin recovery and execution on international contracts.
Sentiment:
⚖️Neutral

Which Baskets Do They Appear In?

Oil & Gas

Oil & Gas

Fuel up with investment opportunities in the energy markets. This collection features carefully selected stocks from industry giants and innovators, chosen by professional analysts for their potential in the growing $6.93 trillion global oil and gas market.

Published: May 15, 2025

Explore Basket

Investment Analysis

Pros

  • Phillips 66 has diverse operations spanning midstream, chemicals, refining, marketing, and renewable fuels, supporting business resilience across energy segments.
  • The company consistently delivers solid profitability, with net income around $1.7 billion and a healthy dividend yield near 3.5%, providing income stability to investors.
  • Analysts generally maintain a 'Buy' or 'Hold' consensus with moderate upside expectations, reflecting steady long-term growth potential supported by strategic asset management.

Considerations

  • Phillips 66 faces cyclical risks linked to commodity price volatility, particularly crack spreads that affect refining margins, introducing earnings uncertainty.
  • The stock's mid-term price forecasts indicate potential downside risks with projected price dips around 10-12% by late 2025, highlighting short-term downward pressure.
  • Operational execution challenges exist in scaling its renewable fuels division, posing risks to its strategic pivot and future growth in lower-carbon energy solutions.
SLB

SLB

SLB

Pros

  • Schlumberger is a global leader in oilfield services, offering advanced technologies including digital and AI-driven solutions that enhance upstream oil and gas operations.
  • Its international presence across diverse geographic markets reduces dependence on any single region, providing risk diversification amid fluctuating energy demands.
  • The company generates steady income with a consistent dividend yield near 2%, supported by long-term contracts and service offerings critical to exploration and production.

Considerations

  • As an oilfield services provider, Schlumberger’s performance is highly correlated with upstream capital expenditures, making it vulnerable to cyclical downturns in oil exploration activity.
  • Exposure to geopolitical and regulatory risks in multiple operating regions can impact project timelines and profitability, creating uncertainty in global operations.
  • Competitive pressure from peers and evolving technology demands require continual investment, which may affect margins and introduce execution risks.

Why invest with Nemo?

Nemo Logo Fade
🆓

Zero Commission

Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.

🔒

Trusted & Regulated

Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.

💰

6% Interest on Cash

Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.

Discover More Comparisons

Phillips 66TC Energy

Phillips 66 vs TC Energy

Phillips 66 vs TC Energy: A stock comparison

Phillips 66MPLX

Phillips 66 vs MPLX

Phillips 66 vs MPLX: A business comparison

EOG ResourcesSLB

EOG Resources vs SLB

EOG Resources vs SLB

Frequently asked questions