

Phillips 66 vs MPLX
Phillips 66 and MPLX are analysed side by side to explain how their business models, financial performance, and market context differ. This page provides a neutral, accessible comparison of strategies, earnings drivers, and industry positioning; suitable for educational purposes. Educational content, not financial advice.
Phillips 66 and MPLX are analysed side by side to explain how their business models, financial performance, and market context differ. This page provides a neutral, accessible comparison of strategies...
Why It's Moving

Phillips 66 surges past market gains as analysts lift targets amid strategic asset sales.
- Piper Sandler raised its price target from $170 to $171 on December 5, maintaining a neutral stance, while Barclays hiked to $141, reflecting optimism on operational shifts[5][2].
- Company finalized β¬2.5 billion sale of 65% stake in German JET network to Stonepeak on December 1, streamlining focus on core refining amid high utilization rates[3][7].
- Declared $1.20 quarterly dividend payable December 1, underscoring commitment to shareholders despite LA refinery wind-down by year-end[3].

MPLX LP Boosts Distribution 12.5% on Robust Q3 Results, Signaling Confidence in Midstream Growth
- Adjusted EBITDA hit $1.8 billion, up significantly and covering the 1.3x distribution payout, highlighting operational strength in Permian and Marcellus regions.
- Distributable cash flow reached $1.5 billion, fueling $1.1 billion in capital returns including a 12.5% distribution increase and $100 million in unit repurchases.
- Portfolio moves include acquiring a Delaware Basin sour gas treating business while divesting Rockies assets, sharpening focus on high-growth areas.

Phillips 66 surges past market gains as analysts lift targets amid strategic asset sales.
- Piper Sandler raised its price target from $170 to $171 on December 5, maintaining a neutral stance, while Barclays hiked to $141, reflecting optimism on operational shifts[5][2].
- Company finalized β¬2.5 billion sale of 65% stake in German JET network to Stonepeak on December 1, streamlining focus on core refining amid high utilization rates[3][7].
- Declared $1.20 quarterly dividend payable December 1, underscoring commitment to shareholders despite LA refinery wind-down by year-end[3].

MPLX LP Boosts Distribution 12.5% on Robust Q3 Results, Signaling Confidence in Midstream Growth
- Adjusted EBITDA hit $1.8 billion, up significantly and covering the 1.3x distribution payout, highlighting operational strength in Permian and Marcellus regions.
- Distributable cash flow reached $1.5 billion, fueling $1.1 billion in capital returns including a 12.5% distribution increase and $100 million in unit repurchases.
- Portfolio moves include acquiring a Delaware Basin sour gas treating business while divesting Rockies assets, sharpening focus on high-growth areas.
Which Baskets Do They Appear In?
Venezuelan Oil's Return to U.S. Refiners
Chevron has resumed shipping crude oil from Venezuela to the U.S., marking a significant policy shift and restoring a key supply chain. This creates a potential investment opportunity in U.S. refiners and energy logistics companies that are set to benefit from the influx of desirable heavy crude.
Published: August 17, 2025
Explore BasketWhich Baskets Do They Appear In?
Venezuelan Oil's Return to U.S. Refiners
Chevron has resumed shipping crude oil from Venezuela to the U.S., marking a significant policy shift and restoring a key supply chain. This creates a potential investment opportunity in U.S. refiners and energy logistics companies that are set to benefit from the influx of desirable heavy crude.
Published: August 17, 2025
Explore BasketInvestment Analysis

Phillips 66
PSX
Pros
- Phillips 66 maintains a diversified energy business with refining, midstream, chemicals, and a growing renewables segment offering balanced exposure to traditional and future fuels.
- The company is benefiting from strong refining margins and operational improvements, contributing to recent earnings growth and cash flow resilience.
- Phillips 66 offers a steady and attractive dividend yield, supported by a history of consistent payouts and capital allocation discipline.
Considerations
- The stock carries cyclical and commodity price risks, with earnings heavily influenced by volatile crack spreads and global energy markets.
- Phillips 66βs valuation looks elevated compared to peers, with a high trailing price-to-earnings ratio despite moderate consensus upside expectations.
- Strategic execution risks exist as the company pivots toward renewables, with uncertain payoffs and potential for missteps in integrating new business lines.

MPLX
MPLX
Pros
- MPLX owns and operates critical midstream energy infrastructure, providing stable, fee-based revenues from long-term contracts with integrated energy producers.
- The company boasts a high dividend yield with a conservative payout ratio, appealing to income-focused investors in the current market environment.
- MPLXβs asset base is diversified across logistics, storage, and natural gas processing, reducing reliance on any single commodity or customer segment.
Considerations
- MPLXβs growth outlook remains muted, with limited organic expansion opportunities and reliance on parent-company drop-downs for material capital projects.
- The stockβs low beta and dividend yield reflect market perception of limited upside, especially if energy infrastructure investment sentiment softens.
- MPLXβs elevated debt levels and complex capital structure could pose liquidity and refinancing risks if interest rates remain higher for longer.
Why invest with Nemo?
Zero Commission
Trade stocks, ETFs, and more with zero commission. Keep more of your returns.
Trusted & Regulated
Part of Exinity Group 2015, serving over a million customers globally.
6% Interest on Cash
Earn 6% AER on uninvested cash with daily interest payments.
Discover More Comparisons


Phillips 66 vs TC Energy
Phillips 66 vs TC Energy: A stock comparison


Phillips 66 vs SLB
Phillips 66 vs SLB: a stock comparison


SLB vs MPLX
SLB vs MPLX: A comparison of business models