What is a "gross booking" in the travel industry context?

Gross bookings represent the total value of travel products and services purchased by customers through a platform, before any commissions, cancellations, or refunds are accounted for. It serves as a key indicator of a travel company's sales volume and overall market demand for its offerings. Higher gross bookings generally suggest robust customer activity and market penetration, reflecting the success of the platform in facilitating transactions.

What do "loyalty programmes" mean for travel companies?

Loyalty programmes are initiatives designed by companies to reward and retain repeat customers. For travel companies, these programmes, such as Booking Holdings' Genius or Expedia's One Key, offer benefits like discounts, upgrades, or exclusive access. Their primary aim is to foster customer loyalty, encourage direct bookings, and increase customer lifetime value, thereby strengthening the company's market position and revenue streams.

What does "operating leverage" refer to in business?

Operating leverage describes how a company's operating income changes in response to a change in sales revenue. A high operating leverage means that a small increase in sales can lead to a proportionally larger increase in operating income, due to a high proportion of fixed costs. Conversely, negative operating leverage, as indicated by Booking Holdings' 15% operating expense growth, can mean profits grow slower than revenues, or even decline.

How do "stock returns" indicate performance?

Stock returns measure the profit or loss an investor makes over a period, expressed as a percentage of the initial investment. They combine capital appreciation and any dividends paid. Comparing a company's stock return, such as Booking Holdings' 10.3% or Expedia's 55.6% in 2025, against market benchmarks like the S&P 500 helps assess its relative investment performance during that specific timeframe and against its peers.

What does "stock volatility" suggest about a company?

Stock volatility measures the degree of variation in a stock's price over time. A higher volatility, like Expedia's 8.11% compared to Booking Holdings' 5.42%, indicates that the stock's price can fluctuate more significantly and rapidly. While higher volatility can present opportunities for greater gains, it also implies a higher risk of larger losses, reflecting market uncertainty or specific company-related factors.

Why is "EBITDA margin" a key financial metric?

EBITDA margin (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortisation) is a profitability metric that shows a company's operational efficiency as a percentage of its revenue. It helps evaluate core business performance by excluding non-operating expenses and non-cash items. An expanding EBITDA margin, like the over 200 basis points achieved by Expedia, suggests improved cost control and operational efficiency within the business.

How does "inventory size" impact a travel company's operations?

Inventory size, referring to the number of available listings or properties, directly influences a travel company's market reach and customer appeal. A larger inventory, such as Booking Holdings' over 28 million listings, offers customers more choice and can attract a broader user base. Conversely, a smaller inventory, like Expedia's over 3 million, might focus on specific segments or require strong partnerships to compete effectively.

What role does "B2B gross bookings" play in a travel company's strategy?

B2B (business-to-business) gross bookings refer to sales generated through partnerships with other businesses, such as airlines or banks, rather than directly to consumers. This segment can be crucial for diversifying revenue streams, expanding market reach without heavy marketing costs, and building strategic alliances. A surge in B2B bookings, like Expedia's 26% growth in Q3 2025, indicates successful enterprise-level collaborations.

How do "commission rates" affect the revenue model of online travel agencies?

Commission rates are the percentages travel agencies charge property owners or service providers for facilitating bookings. These rates are a primary revenue source for online travel platforms. Varying commission structures, such as Expedia's 10-30% range for hotels, can impact a company's profitability and its relationship with suppliers. The average rate directly influences the gross profit generated per booking.

What is the significance of "accommodation listings" for an online travel platform?

Accommodation listings are the bedrock of an online travel platform's offering, representing the total number of hotels, homes, and other properties available for booking. A vast network, like Booking Holdings' over 28 million listings across 220+ countries, provides comprehensive options for travellers and builds a strong competitive moat. It directly contributes to scale, market dominance, and customer choice.

What should I consider when interpreting financial growth percentages?

When interpreting financial growth percentages, such as room nights growth or gross bookings growth, it is important to consider the base from which the growth is calculated and the timeframe. Comparing rates like Booking Holdings' 8.2% room nights growth against Expedia's 10% requires understanding the differing scales and strategies of each company, as well as broader market conditions that might influence these figures.

How should these FAQs be used when comparing companies?

These frequently asked questions aim to provide foundational knowledge to help you understand the terminology and metrics used in financial comparisons. They are designed to clarify concepts and aid in interpreting the data presented about companies like Booking Holdings and Expedia. This content is for educational purposes only and should not be considered as financial advice or a recommendation to buy or sell any stock.

Live Report · Updated 26 August 2026

Booking Holdings vs Expedia

Online travel giant powering global bookings vs Major global online travel platform for flights and hotels. Which is the better buy for your portfolio in August 2026? Plain-English answer below.

Booking Holdings owns Booking.com, Priceline, Kayak, and OpenTable, processing hundreds of billions in gross travel bookings each year with operating margins that make most internet businesses jealous, while Expedia runs Hotels.com, Vrbo, and its namesake platform with a more marketing-intensive model that's consistently earned lower returns on invested capital. Both are online travel agencies battling Google, Airbnb, and each other for the same pool of travelers. The Booking Holdings vs Expedia comparison examines how European accommodation dominance and merchant-model discipline compare to Expedia's loyalty strategy and higher customer-acquisition costs across a sprawling multi-brand portfolio.

Booking Holdings owns Booking.com, Priceline, Kayak, and OpenTable, processing hundreds of billions in gross travel bookings each year with operating margins that make most internet businesses jealous...

Comparison Snapshot

Key Financial Metrics

BKNG

Metric

EXPE

$160.63B

Market Cap

$40.56B

1,041.26%

Potential Profit

-24.73%

Buy

Analyst Rating

Buy

Why It’s Moving

Booking Holdings gains traction as a solid Q2 beat reassures investors on travel demand

Q2 results beat expectations, with revenue up 8% and adjusted EPS up 15%, showing travel demand stayed resilient despite geopolitical headwinds.
Management pointed to a record $4.1 billion in quarterly capital returns, reinforcing the company’s strong cash generation and shareholder-friendly posture.
Analysts turned more constructive after the print, citing better-than-feared demand trends and improved visibility into full-year growth despite ongoing macro uncertainty.

Sentiment:

🐃Bullish

Expedia’s strong Q2 beat and raised outlook keep the 2026 upside story alive

Q2 results came in ahead of expectations, with revenue and earnings beating forecasts and reinforcing that travel demand has stayed resilient into the summer season.
Management raised full-year guidance after the quarter, signaling confidence that stronger bookings and improving profitability can carry into the rest of 2026.
Analysts turned more constructive after the print, pointing to better execution, margin expansion, and ongoing share repurchases as reasons the stock has re-rated higher.

Sentiment:

🐃Bullish

Booking Holdings gains traction as a solid Q2 beat reassures investors on travel demand

Q2 results beat expectations, with revenue up 8% and adjusted EPS up 15%, showing travel demand stayed resilient despite geopolitical headwinds.
Management pointed to a record $4.1 billion in quarterly capital returns, reinforcing the company’s strong cash generation and shareholder-friendly posture.
Analysts turned more constructive after the print, citing better-than-feared demand trends and improved visibility into full-year growth despite ongoing macro uncertainty.

Sentiment:

🐃Bullish

Expedia’s strong Q2 beat and raised outlook keep the 2026 upside story alive

Q2 results came in ahead of expectations, with revenue and earnings beating forecasts and reinforcing that travel demand has stayed resilient into the summer season.
Management raised full-year guidance after the quarter, signaling confidence that stronger bookings and improving profitability can carry into the rest of 2026.
Analysts turned more constructive after the print, pointing to better execution, margin expansion, and ongoing share repurchases as reasons the stock has re-rated higher.

Sentiment:

🐃Bullish

Discover More Comparisons

Booking Holdings vs Nike

Booking Holdings dominates global online travel with its asset-light platform connecting hundreds of millions of travelers to accommodations and flights, while Nike owns one of the most valuable consumer brands in sports apparel and footwear worldwide. Booking Holdings vs Nike matches an internet marketplace harvesting transaction fees at enormous scale against a brand powerhouse that controls product design, supply chain, and distribution. Readers learn how take-rate dynamics and brand equity monetization produce very different free cash flow profiles and growth runways.

Booking Holdings vs Tripadvisor

Booking Holdings runs the global online travel market through scale advantages that have made it nearly impossible to displace, while Tripadvisor struggles to convert massive traffic into sustainable monetization after years of strategic pivots. Both platforms live at the intersection of travel intent and commerce, yet their unit economics tell very different stories. The Booking Holdings vs Tripadvisor comparison exposes the gap between a dominant marketplace compounder and a brand-rich but profit-challenged platform still searching for its best business model.

Booking Holdings vs TJX

Booking Holdings runs the world's largest online travel marketplace and generates extraordinary free cash flow from a nearly fixed-cost platform, while TJX operates off-price retail with an opportunistic merchandise-buying model that thrives in any economic environment. Both companies have proven they can compound returns across full business cycles. Booking Holdings vs TJX puts a digital travel giant against the queen of off-price retail so you can compare platform economics with physical-store execution at massive scale.

Investment Analysis

Booking Holdings

BKNG

Pros

Booking Holdings maintains larger scale with over 28 million accommodation listings across 220+ countries.
Genius loyalty programme drives direct engagement and repeat bookings effectively.
Achieved 14% gross bookings growth in Q3 2025, outpacing Expedia on revenue expansion.

Considerations

Growth decelerating relative to competitors, with room nights up only 8.2% versus Expedia's 10% in 2025.
Stock returned just 10.3% in 2025, lagging S&P 500 and Expedia's 55.6% surge.
Higher cost of revenue and 15% operating expense growth signal negative operating leverage.

Expedia

EXPE

Pros

B2B gross bookings surged 26% in Q3 2025 through partnerships with airlines and banks.
One Key loyalty programme boosted room nights growth to 10%, exceeding Booking Holdings.
Adjusted EBITDA margin expanded over 200 basis points, achieving faster efficiency gains.

Considerations

Higher stock volatility at 8.11% compared to Booking Holdings' 5.42%.
Smaller inventory with over 3 million listings versus Booking's 28 million properties.
Commissions vary widely from 10-30%, averaging 20% for hotels.

Related Market Insights

Airbnb Stock AI Earnings: When the Numbers Finally Back the Hype

Explore how Airbnb's Q2 earnings reveal AI-driven operating leverage. Compare ABNB, Booking Holdings, and Expedia performance on the ADGM-regulated Nemo platform.